Cargando…

Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification

We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu, Araki, Fujio, Tominaga, Hirofumi, Sakata, Junichi, Kawasaki, Keiichi, Kanetake, Nagisa, Iwashita, Yuki, Yoshimura, Saori, Kawakami, Tamami, Ishihara, Terunobu, Okuda, Tomoko, Kogo, Kasei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856
_version_ 1783284298905812992
author Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Araki, Fujio
Tominaga, Hirofumi
Sakata, Junichi
Kawasaki, Keiichi
Kanetake, Nagisa
Iwashita, Yuki
Yoshimura, Saori
Kawakami, Tamami
Ishihara, Terunobu
Okuda, Tomoko
Kogo, Kasei
author_facet Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Araki, Fujio
Tominaga, Hirofumi
Sakata, Junichi
Kawasaki, Keiichi
Kanetake, Nagisa
Iwashita, Yuki
Yoshimura, Saori
Kawakami, Tamami
Ishihara, Terunobu
Okuda, Tomoko
Kogo, Kasei
author_sort Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
collection PubMed
description We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–180°, and a 1° step for lateral angles of 90°–110° in a phantom, with a [Formula: see text] field for 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The MatriXX doses were also calculated under the same conditions by the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The CFs for the angular dependence of MatriXX were obtained as a function of θ from the ratios of MatriXX‐measured doses to MC‐calculated doses, and normalized at [Formula: see text]. The corrected MatriXX were validated with different fields, various simple plans, and clinical treatment plans. The dose distributions were compared with those of MC calculations and film. The absolute doses were also compared with ionization chamber and MC‐calculated doses. The angular dependence of MatriXX showed over‐responses of up to 6% and 4% at [Formula: see text] and under‐responses of up to 15% and 11% at 92°, and 8% and 5% at 180° for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively. At 92°, the CFs for the off‐axis detectors were larger by up to 7% and 6% than those for the central detectors for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively, and were within 2.5% at other gantry angles. For simple plans, MatriXX doses with angular correction were within 2% of those measured with the ionization chamber at the central axis and off‐axis. For clinical treatment plans, MatriXX with angular correction agreed well with dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) for gamma evaluation at 3% and 3 mm. The angular dependence corrections of MatriXX were useful in improving the measurement accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57182442018-04-02 Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Araki, Fujio Tominaga, Hirofumi Sakata, Junichi Kawasaki, Keiichi Kanetake, Nagisa Iwashita, Yuki Yoshimura, Saori Kawakami, Tamami Ishihara, Terunobu Okuda, Tomoko Kogo, Kasei J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–180°, and a 1° step for lateral angles of 90°–110° in a phantom, with a [Formula: see text] field for 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The MatriXX doses were also calculated under the same conditions by the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The CFs for the angular dependence of MatriXX were obtained as a function of θ from the ratios of MatriXX‐measured doses to MC‐calculated doses, and normalized at [Formula: see text]. The corrected MatriXX were validated with different fields, various simple plans, and clinical treatment plans. The dose distributions were compared with those of MC calculations and film. The absolute doses were also compared with ionization chamber and MC‐calculated doses. The angular dependence of MatriXX showed over‐responses of up to 6% and 4% at [Formula: see text] and under‐responses of up to 15% and 11% at 92°, and 8% and 5% at 180° for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively. At 92°, the CFs for the off‐axis detectors were larger by up to 7% and 6% than those for the central detectors for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively, and were within 2.5% at other gantry angles. For simple plans, MatriXX doses with angular correction were within 2% of those measured with the ionization chamber at the central axis and off‐axis. For clinical treatment plans, MatriXX with angular correction agreed well with dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) for gamma evaluation at 3% and 3 mm. The angular dependence corrections of MatriXX were useful in improving the measurement accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718244/ /pubmed/22955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Araki, Fujio
Tominaga, Hirofumi
Sakata, Junichi
Kawasaki, Keiichi
Kanetake, Nagisa
Iwashita, Yuki
Yoshimura, Saori
Kawakami, Tamami
Ishihara, Terunobu
Okuda, Tomoko
Kogo, Kasei
Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title_full Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title_fullStr Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title_full_unstemmed Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title_short Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
title_sort angular dependence correction of matrixx and its application to composite dose verification
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856
work_keys_str_mv AT shimohigashiyoshinobu angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT arakifujio angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT tominagahirofumi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT sakatajunichi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT kawasakikeiichi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT kanetakenagisa angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT iwashitayuki angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT yoshimurasaori angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT kawakamitamami angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT ishiharaterunobu angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT okudatomoko angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification
AT kogokasei angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification