Cargando…
Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification
We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–18...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856 |
_version_ | 1783284298905812992 |
---|---|
author | Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Araki, Fujio Tominaga, Hirofumi Sakata, Junichi Kawasaki, Keiichi Kanetake, Nagisa Iwashita, Yuki Yoshimura, Saori Kawakami, Tamami Ishihara, Terunobu Okuda, Tomoko Kogo, Kasei |
author_facet | Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Araki, Fujio Tominaga, Hirofumi Sakata, Junichi Kawasaki, Keiichi Kanetake, Nagisa Iwashita, Yuki Yoshimura, Saori Kawakami, Tamami Ishihara, Terunobu Okuda, Tomoko Kogo, Kasei |
author_sort | Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–180°, and a 1° step for lateral angles of 90°–110° in a phantom, with a [Formula: see text] field for 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The MatriXX doses were also calculated under the same conditions by the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The CFs for the angular dependence of MatriXX were obtained as a function of θ from the ratios of MatriXX‐measured doses to MC‐calculated doses, and normalized at [Formula: see text]. The corrected MatriXX were validated with different fields, various simple plans, and clinical treatment plans. The dose distributions were compared with those of MC calculations and film. The absolute doses were also compared with ionization chamber and MC‐calculated doses. The angular dependence of MatriXX showed over‐responses of up to 6% and 4% at [Formula: see text] and under‐responses of up to 15% and 11% at 92°, and 8% and 5% at 180° for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively. At 92°, the CFs for the off‐axis detectors were larger by up to 7% and 6% than those for the central detectors for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively, and were within 2.5% at other gantry angles. For simple plans, MatriXX doses with angular correction were within 2% of those measured with the ionization chamber at the central axis and off‐axis. For clinical treatment plans, MatriXX with angular correction agreed well with dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) for gamma evaluation at 3% and 3 mm. The angular dependence corrections of MatriXX were useful in improving the measurement accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57182442018-04-02 Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Araki, Fujio Tominaga, Hirofumi Sakata, Junichi Kawasaki, Keiichi Kanetake, Nagisa Iwashita, Yuki Yoshimura, Saori Kawakami, Tamami Ishihara, Terunobu Okuda, Tomoko Kogo, Kasei J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–180°, and a 1° step for lateral angles of 90°–110° in a phantom, with a [Formula: see text] field for 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The MatriXX doses were also calculated under the same conditions by the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The CFs for the angular dependence of MatriXX were obtained as a function of θ from the ratios of MatriXX‐measured doses to MC‐calculated doses, and normalized at [Formula: see text]. The corrected MatriXX were validated with different fields, various simple plans, and clinical treatment plans. The dose distributions were compared with those of MC calculations and film. The absolute doses were also compared with ionization chamber and MC‐calculated doses. The angular dependence of MatriXX showed over‐responses of up to 6% and 4% at [Formula: see text] and under‐responses of up to 15% and 11% at 92°, and 8% and 5% at 180° for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively. At 92°, the CFs for the off‐axis detectors were larger by up to 7% and 6% than those for the central detectors for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively, and were within 2.5% at other gantry angles. For simple plans, MatriXX doses with angular correction were within 2% of those measured with the ionization chamber at the central axis and off‐axis. For clinical treatment plans, MatriXX with angular correction agreed well with dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) for gamma evaluation at 3% and 3 mm. The angular dependence corrections of MatriXX were useful in improving the measurement accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718244/ /pubmed/22955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Araki, Fujio Tominaga, Hirofumi Sakata, Junichi Kawasaki, Keiichi Kanetake, Nagisa Iwashita, Yuki Yoshimura, Saori Kawakami, Tamami Ishihara, Terunobu Okuda, Tomoko Kogo, Kasei Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title | Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title_full | Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title_fullStr | Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title_full_unstemmed | Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title_short | Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification |
title_sort | angular dependence correction of matrixx and its application to composite dose verification |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimohigashiyoshinobu angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT arakifujio angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT tominagahirofumi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT sakatajunichi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT kawasakikeiichi angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT kanetakenagisa angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT iwashitayuki angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT yoshimurasaori angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT kawakamitamami angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT ishiharaterunobu angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT okudatomoko angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification AT kogokasei angulardependencecorrectionofmatrixxanditsapplicationtocompositedoseverification |