Cargando…

Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system

The feasibility of accounting of the dose from kilovoltage cone‐beam CT in treatment planning has been discussed previously for a single cone‐beam CT (CBCT) beam from one manufacturer. Modeling the beams and computing the dose from the full set of beams produced by a kilovoltage cone‐beam CT system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alaei, Parham, Spezi, Emiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3971
_version_ 1783284330895769600
author Alaei, Parham
Spezi, Emiliano
author_facet Alaei, Parham
Spezi, Emiliano
author_sort Alaei, Parham
collection PubMed
description The feasibility of accounting of the dose from kilovoltage cone‐beam CT in treatment planning has been discussed previously for a single cone‐beam CT (CBCT) beam from one manufacturer. Modeling the beams and computing the dose from the full set of beams produced by a kilovoltage cone‐beam CT system requires extensive beam data collection and verification, and is the purpose of this work. The beams generated by Elekta X‐ray volume imaging (XVI) kilovoltage CBCT (kV CBCT) system for various cassettes and filters have been modeled in the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) and used to compute dose to stack and anthropomorphic phantoms. The results were then compared to measurements made using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The agreement between modeled and measured depth‐dose and cross profiles is within 2% at depths beyond 1 cm for depth‐dose curves, and for regions within the beam (excluding penumbra) for cross profiles. The agreements between TPS‐calculated doses, TLD measurements, and Monte Carlo simulations are generally within 5% in the stack phantom and 10% in the anthropomorphic phantom, with larger variations observed for some of the measurement/calculation points. Dose computation using modeled beams is reasonably accurate, except for regions that include bony anatomy. Inclusion of this dose in treatment plans can lead to more accurate dose prediction, especially when the doses to organs at risk are of importance. PACS numbers: 87.55.D, 87.55.K, 87.56.bd
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185242018-04-02 Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system Alaei, Parham Spezi, Emiliano J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The feasibility of accounting of the dose from kilovoltage cone‐beam CT in treatment planning has been discussed previously for a single cone‐beam CT (CBCT) beam from one manufacturer. Modeling the beams and computing the dose from the full set of beams produced by a kilovoltage cone‐beam CT system requires extensive beam data collection and verification, and is the purpose of this work. The beams generated by Elekta X‐ray volume imaging (XVI) kilovoltage CBCT (kV CBCT) system for various cassettes and filters have been modeled in the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) and used to compute dose to stack and anthropomorphic phantoms. The results were then compared to measurements made using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The agreement between modeled and measured depth‐dose and cross profiles is within 2% at depths beyond 1 cm for depth‐dose curves, and for regions within the beam (excluding penumbra) for cross profiles. The agreements between TPS‐calculated doses, TLD measurements, and Monte Carlo simulations are generally within 5% in the stack phantom and 10% in the anthropomorphic phantom, with larger variations observed for some of the measurement/calculation points. Dose computation using modeled beams is reasonably accurate, except for regions that include bony anatomy. Inclusion of this dose in treatment plans can lead to more accurate dose prediction, especially when the doses to organs at risk are of importance. PACS numbers: 87.55.D, 87.55.K, 87.56.bd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5718524/ /pubmed/23149789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3971 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Alaei, Parham
Spezi, Emiliano
Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title_full Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title_fullStr Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title_short Commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam CT beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
title_sort commissioning kilovoltage cone‐beam ct beams in a radiation therapy treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3971
work_keys_str_mv AT alaeiparham commissioningkilovoltageconebeamctbeamsinaradiationtherapytreatmentplanningsystem
AT speziemiliano commissioningkilovoltageconebeamctbeamsinaradiationtherapytreatmentplanningsystem