Cargando…

The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry

A recent control system update for Elekta linear accelerators includes the ability to deliver volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with continuously variable dose rate (CVDR), rather than a number of fixed binned dose rates (BDR). The capacity to select from a larger range of dose rates allows th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boylan, Christopher, McWilliam, Alan, Johnstone, Emily, Rowbottom, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.4023
_version_ 1783284332572442624
author Boylan, Christopher
McWilliam, Alan
Johnstone, Emily
Rowbottom, Carl
author_facet Boylan, Christopher
McWilliam, Alan
Johnstone, Emily
Rowbottom, Carl
author_sort Boylan, Christopher
collection PubMed
description A recent control system update for Elekta linear accelerators includes the ability to deliver volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with continuously variable dose rate (CVDR), rather than a number of fixed binned dose rates (BDR). The capacity to select from a larger range of dose rates allows the linac to maintain higher gantry speeds, resulting in faster, smoother deliveries. The purpose of this study is to investigate two components of CVDR delivery — the increase in average dose rate and gantry speed, and a determination of their effects on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry. Initially, ten VMAT plans (5 prostate, 5 head and neck) were delivered to a [Formula: see text] dosimetric phantom using both the BDR and CVDR systems. The plans were found to be dosimetrically robust using both delivery methods, although CVDR was observed to give higher gamma pass rates at the [Formula: see text] gamma level for prostates ([Formula: see text]). For the dual arc head‐and‐neck plans, CVDR delivery resulted in improved pass rates at all gamma levels ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]) for individual arc verifications ([Formula: see text]), but gave similar results to BDR when both arcs were combined. To investigate the impact of increased gantry speed on MLC positioning, a dynamic leaf‐tracking tool was developed using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Comparing the detected MLC positions to those expected from the plan, CVDR was observed to result in a larger mean error compared to BDR (0.13 cm and 0.06 cm, respectively, [Formula: see text]). The EPID images were also used to monitor beam stability during delivery. It was found that the CVDR deliveries had a lower standard deviation of the gun‐target (GT) and transverse (AB) profiles ([Formula: see text]). This study has determined that CVDR may offer a dosimetric advantage for VMAT plans. While the higher gantry speed of CVDR appears to increase deviations in MLC positioning, the relative effect on dosimetry is lower than the positive impact of a flatter and more stable beam profile. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd; 87.55.km; 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185312018-04-02 The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry Boylan, Christopher McWilliam, Alan Johnstone, Emily Rowbottom, Carl J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A recent control system update for Elekta linear accelerators includes the ability to deliver volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with continuously variable dose rate (CVDR), rather than a number of fixed binned dose rates (BDR). The capacity to select from a larger range of dose rates allows the linac to maintain higher gantry speeds, resulting in faster, smoother deliveries. The purpose of this study is to investigate two components of CVDR delivery — the increase in average dose rate and gantry speed, and a determination of their effects on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry. Initially, ten VMAT plans (5 prostate, 5 head and neck) were delivered to a [Formula: see text] dosimetric phantom using both the BDR and CVDR systems. The plans were found to be dosimetrically robust using both delivery methods, although CVDR was observed to give higher gamma pass rates at the [Formula: see text] gamma level for prostates ([Formula: see text]). For the dual arc head‐and‐neck plans, CVDR delivery resulted in improved pass rates at all gamma levels ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]) for individual arc verifications ([Formula: see text]), but gave similar results to BDR when both arcs were combined. To investigate the impact of increased gantry speed on MLC positioning, a dynamic leaf‐tracking tool was developed using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Comparing the detected MLC positions to those expected from the plan, CVDR was observed to result in a larger mean error compared to BDR (0.13 cm and 0.06 cm, respectively, [Formula: see text]). The EPID images were also used to monitor beam stability during delivery. It was found that the CVDR deliveries had a lower standard deviation of the gun‐target (GT) and transverse (AB) profiles ([Formula: see text]). This study has determined that CVDR may offer a dosimetric advantage for VMAT plans. While the higher gantry speed of CVDR appears to increase deviations in MLC positioning, the relative effect on dosimetry is lower than the positive impact of a flatter and more stable beam profile. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd; 87.55.km; 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718531/ /pubmed/23149797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.4023 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Boylan, Christopher
McWilliam, Alan
Johnstone, Emily
Rowbottom, Carl
The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title_full The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title_fullStr The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title_short The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
title_sort impact of continuously‐variable dose rate vmat on beam stability, mlc positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.4023
work_keys_str_mv AT boylanchristopher theimpactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT mcwilliamalan theimpactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT johnstoneemily theimpactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT rowbottomcarl theimpactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT boylanchristopher impactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT mcwilliamalan impactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT johnstoneemily impactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry
AT rowbottomcarl impactofcontinuouslyvariabledoseratevmatonbeamstabilitymlcpositioningandoverallplandosimetry