Cargando…

Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111

The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measured with a 10 cm long pencil ionization chamber placed in a 14 cm long PMMA phantom is typically used to evaluate the doses delivered during CT procedure. For the new generation of CT scanners, the efficiency of this methodology is low because it exclud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Descamps, C., Gonzalez, M., Garrigo, E., Germanier, A., Venencia, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3934
_version_ 1783284333063176192
author Descamps, C.
Gonzalez, M.
Garrigo, E.
Germanier, A.
Venencia, D.
author_facet Descamps, C.
Gonzalez, M.
Garrigo, E.
Germanier, A.
Venencia, D.
author_sort Descamps, C.
collection PubMed
description The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measured with a 10 cm long pencil ionization chamber placed in a 14 cm long PMMA phantom is typically used to evaluate the doses delivered during CT procedure. For the new generation of CT scanners, the efficiency of this methodology is low because it excludes the contribution of radiation scattered beyond the 100 mm range of integration along z. The AAPM TG111 Report proposes a new measurement modality using a small volume ionization chamber positioned in a phantom long enough to establish dose equilibrium at the location of the chamber. In this work, the AAPM report was implemented. The minimum scanning length needed to obtain cumulative dose equilibrium was evaluated. The equilibrium dose was determined and compared to CTDI values informed by the CT scanner, and the dose values were confirmed with TLD measurements. The difference between doses measured with TLD and with the ionization chamber (IC) was below 1% and the repeatability of the measurements' setup was 0.4%. The measurements showed that the scanning lengths needed to reach the cumulated dose equilibrium were 450 mm and 380 mm for the central and peripheral axes, respectively, which justifies the phantom length. For the studied clinical protocols, the doses measured were about 30% higher than those informed by the CT scanner. For the new generation of CT systems with wider longitudinal detector size or cone‐beam technology, the current CTDI measurements may no longer be adequate, and the informed CTDI tends to undervalue the dose delivered. It is therefore important to evaluate CT radiation doses following the AAPM TG111 methodology. PACS number: 87.57.qp, 87.53.Bn
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185332018-04-02 Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111 Descamps, C. Gonzalez, M. Garrigo, E. Germanier, A. Venencia, D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measured with a 10 cm long pencil ionization chamber placed in a 14 cm long PMMA phantom is typically used to evaluate the doses delivered during CT procedure. For the new generation of CT scanners, the efficiency of this methodology is low because it excludes the contribution of radiation scattered beyond the 100 mm range of integration along z. The AAPM TG111 Report proposes a new measurement modality using a small volume ionization chamber positioned in a phantom long enough to establish dose equilibrium at the location of the chamber. In this work, the AAPM report was implemented. The minimum scanning length needed to obtain cumulative dose equilibrium was evaluated. The equilibrium dose was determined and compared to CTDI values informed by the CT scanner, and the dose values were confirmed with TLD measurements. The difference between doses measured with TLD and with the ionization chamber (IC) was below 1% and the repeatability of the measurements' setup was 0.4%. The measurements showed that the scanning lengths needed to reach the cumulated dose equilibrium were 450 mm and 380 mm for the central and peripheral axes, respectively, which justifies the phantom length. For the studied clinical protocols, the doses measured were about 30% higher than those informed by the CT scanner. For the new generation of CT systems with wider longitudinal detector size or cone‐beam technology, the current CTDI measurements may no longer be adequate, and the informed CTDI tends to undervalue the dose delivered. It is therefore important to evaluate CT radiation doses following the AAPM TG111 methodology. PACS number: 87.57.qp, 87.53.Bn John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5718533/ /pubmed/23149785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3934 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Descamps, C.
Gonzalez, M.
Garrigo, E.
Germanier, A.
Venencia, D.
Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title_full Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title_fullStr Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title_full_unstemmed Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title_short Measurements of the dose delivered during CT exams using AAPM Task Group Report No. 111
title_sort measurements of the dose delivered during ct exams using aapm task group report no. 111
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3934
work_keys_str_mv AT descampsc measurementsofthedosedeliveredduringctexamsusingaapmtaskgroupreportno111
AT gonzalezm measurementsofthedosedeliveredduringctexamsusingaapmtaskgroupreportno111
AT garrigoe measurementsofthedosedeliveredduringctexamsusingaapmtaskgroupreportno111
AT germaniera measurementsofthedosedeliveredduringctexamsusingaapmtaskgroupreportno111
AT venenciad measurementsofthedosedeliveredduringctexamsusingaapmtaskgroupreportno111