Cargando…

Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma

The purpose of this study is to apply noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (Nonco_IMRT) to young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Nonco_IMRT was evaluated through a planning comparison study with coplanar IMRT (Co_IMRT) and conventional anteroposterior and posteroanterior fiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xinyuan, Jin, Dawei, Wang, Shulian, Li, Minghui, Huang, Peng, Dai, Jianrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3769
_version_ 1783284333797179392
author Chen, Xinyuan
Jin, Dawei
Wang, Shulian
Li, Minghui
Huang, Peng
Dai, Jianrong
author_facet Chen, Xinyuan
Jin, Dawei
Wang, Shulian
Li, Minghui
Huang, Peng
Dai, Jianrong
author_sort Chen, Xinyuan
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to apply noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (Nonco_IMRT) to young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Nonco_IMRT was evaluated through a planning comparison study with coplanar IMRT (Co_IMRT) and conventional anteroposterior and posteroanterior fields (AP–PA) plans. Co_IMRT was performed with five equally spaced beams starting from a gantry angle of [Formula: see text]. Nonco_IMRT used two noncoplanar beams in the sagittal plane to replace the Co_IMRT beams that directly irradiated the breasts. Nineteen young female patients were enrolled in the retrospective study. Dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. For all patients, PTV coverage and heart V30 were similar between the two IMRT techniques ([Formula: see text]). Compared to Co_IMRT, the mean dose delivered and regions receiving a low radiation dose were significantly reduced for bilateral breasts and lungs in Nonco_IMRT ([Formula: see text]). Breast V5 and lung V5 were relatively reduced by 21% and 12%, respectively. Compared with the conventional AP–PA plan, Nonco_IMRT had better PTV coverage and OARs sparing, except for being larger in V5 to breast and lung. In IMRT for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma, using of Nonco_IMRT significantly reduces the radiation dose to the breasts and lungs compared with Co_IMRT, and consequently reduces the risk of breast second cancer and pulmonary toxicity. Besides young female patients, Nonco_IMRT can also benefit other mediastinal lymphoma patients. PACS number: 87.55.D‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185362018-04-02 Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma Chen, Xinyuan Jin, Dawei Wang, Shulian Li, Minghui Huang, Peng Dai, Jianrong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to apply noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (Nonco_IMRT) to young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Nonco_IMRT was evaluated through a planning comparison study with coplanar IMRT (Co_IMRT) and conventional anteroposterior and posteroanterior fields (AP–PA) plans. Co_IMRT was performed with five equally spaced beams starting from a gantry angle of [Formula: see text]. Nonco_IMRT used two noncoplanar beams in the sagittal plane to replace the Co_IMRT beams that directly irradiated the breasts. Nineteen young female patients were enrolled in the retrospective study. Dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. For all patients, PTV coverage and heart V30 were similar between the two IMRT techniques ([Formula: see text]). Compared to Co_IMRT, the mean dose delivered and regions receiving a low radiation dose were significantly reduced for bilateral breasts and lungs in Nonco_IMRT ([Formula: see text]). Breast V5 and lung V5 were relatively reduced by 21% and 12%, respectively. Compared with the conventional AP–PA plan, Nonco_IMRT had better PTV coverage and OARs sparing, except for being larger in V5 to breast and lung. In IMRT for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma, using of Nonco_IMRT significantly reduces the radiation dose to the breasts and lungs compared with Co_IMRT, and consequently reduces the risk of breast second cancer and pulmonary toxicity. Besides young female patients, Nonco_IMRT can also benefit other mediastinal lymphoma patients. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5718536/ /pubmed/23149772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3769 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chen, Xinyuan
Jin, Dawei
Wang, Shulian
Li, Minghui
Huang, Peng
Dai, Jianrong
Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title_full Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title_fullStr Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title_short Noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
title_sort noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal lymphoma
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3769
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxinyuan noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma
AT jindawei noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma
AT wangshulian noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma
AT liminghui noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma
AT huangpeng noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma
AT daijianrong noncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforyoungfemalepatientswithmediastinallymphoma