Cargando…

An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images

The aim of this study is to develop an automated method to objectively compare motion artifacts in two four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) image sets, and identify the one that would appear to human observers with fewer or smaller artifacts. Our proposed method is based on the difference of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Guoqiang, Jew, Brian, Hong, Julian C., Johnston, Eric W., Loo, Billy W., Maxim, Peter G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3838
_version_ 1783284336471048192
author Cui, Guoqiang
Jew, Brian
Hong, Julian C.
Johnston, Eric W.
Loo, Billy W.
Maxim, Peter G
author_facet Cui, Guoqiang
Jew, Brian
Hong, Julian C.
Johnston, Eric W.
Loo, Billy W.
Maxim, Peter G
author_sort Cui, Guoqiang
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to develop an automated method to objectively compare motion artifacts in two four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) image sets, and identify the one that would appear to human observers with fewer or smaller artifacts. Our proposed method is based on the difference of the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at couch transitions, which we hypothesize may be a suitable metric to identify motion artifacts. We evaluated our method using ten pairs of 4D CT image sets that showed subtle differences in artifacts between images in a pair, which were identifiable by human observers. One set of 4D CT images was sorted using breathing traces in which our clinically implemented 4D CT sorting software miscalculated the respiratory phase, which expectedly led to artifacts in the images. The other set of images consisted of the same images; however, these were sorted using the same breathing traces but with corrected phases. Next we calculated the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at all couch transitions for all respiratory phases in both image sets to evaluate for motion artifacts. For nine image set pairs, our method identified the 4D CT sets sorted using the breathing traces with the corrected respiratory phase to result in images with fewer or smaller artifacts, whereas for one image pair, no difference was noted. Two observers independently assessed the accuracy of our method. Both observers identified 9 image sets that were sorted using the breathing traces with corrected respiratory phase as having fewer or smaller artifacts. In summary, using the 4D CT data of ten pairs of 4D CT image sets, we have demonstrated proof of principle that our method is able to replicate the results of two human observers in identifying the image set with fewer or smaller artifacts. PACS number: 87.57.cp; 87.57.N‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185472018-04-02 An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images Cui, Guoqiang Jew, Brian Hong, Julian C. Johnston, Eric W. Loo, Billy W. Maxim, Peter G J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this study is to develop an automated method to objectively compare motion artifacts in two four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) image sets, and identify the one that would appear to human observers with fewer or smaller artifacts. Our proposed method is based on the difference of the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at couch transitions, which we hypothesize may be a suitable metric to identify motion artifacts. We evaluated our method using ten pairs of 4D CT image sets that showed subtle differences in artifacts between images in a pair, which were identifiable by human observers. One set of 4D CT images was sorted using breathing traces in which our clinically implemented 4D CT sorting software miscalculated the respiratory phase, which expectedly led to artifacts in the images. The other set of images consisted of the same images; however, these were sorted using the same breathing traces but with corrected phases. Next we calculated the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at all couch transitions for all respiratory phases in both image sets to evaluate for motion artifacts. For nine image set pairs, our method identified the 4D CT sets sorted using the breathing traces with the corrected respiratory phase to result in images with fewer or smaller artifacts, whereas for one image pair, no difference was noted. Two observers independently assessed the accuracy of our method. Both observers identified 9 image sets that were sorted using the breathing traces with corrected respiratory phase as having fewer or smaller artifacts. In summary, using the 4D CT data of ten pairs of 4D CT image sets, we have demonstrated proof of principle that our method is able to replicate the results of two human observers in identifying the image set with fewer or smaller artifacts. PACS number: 87.57.cp; 87.57.N‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5718547/ /pubmed/23149777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3838 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cui, Guoqiang
Jew, Brian
Hong, Julian C.
Johnston, Eric W.
Loo, Billy W.
Maxim, Peter G
An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title_full An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title_fullStr An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title_full_unstemmed An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title_short An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
title_sort automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23149777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3838
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiguoqiang anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT jewbrian anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT hongjulianc anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT johnstonericw anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT loobillyw anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT maximpeterg anautomatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT cuiguoqiang automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT jewbrian automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT hongjulianc automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT johnstonericw automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT loobillyw automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages
AT maximpeterg automatedmethodforcomparingmotionartifactsincinefourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimages