Cargando…
Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods
The complexity of VMAT delivery requires new methods and potentially new tools for the commissioning of these systems. It appears that great consideration is needed for quality assurance (QA) of these treatments since there are limited devices that are dedicated to the QA of rotational delivery. In...
Autores principales: | Chandraraj, Varatharaj, Stathakis, Sotirios, Manickam, Ravikumar, Esquivel, Carlos, Supe, Sanjay S, Papanikolaou, Nikos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21330988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3373 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA
por: Chandraraj, Varatharaj, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Dosimetric study of 2D ion chamber array matrix for the modern radiotherapy treatment verification
por: Saminathan, Sathiyan, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Anatomy‐based, patient‐specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files
por: Defoor, Dewayne L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Expected clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose distributions in helical tomotherapy for treating head and neck cancer using helical megavoltage CT images
por: Mavroidis, Panayiotis, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Comparing conformal, arc radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in craniospinal irradiation planning
por: Myers, Pamela A., et al.
Publicado: (2014)