Cargando…

Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle

Mechanical flex of the gantry and mounted imaging panels leads to systematic offsets in localization image isocenter as a function of gantry angle for linear accelerator‐mounted image guidance systems. Subsequently, object positions obtained from localization radiographs may be offset, resulting in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, John P., Herman, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21330978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3314
_version_ 1783284342916644864
author Mullins, John P.
Herman, Michael G.
author_facet Mullins, John P.
Herman, Michael G.
author_sort Mullins, John P.
collection PubMed
description Mechanical flex of the gantry and mounted imaging panels leads to systematic offsets in localization image isocenter as a function of gantry angle for linear accelerator‐mounted image guidance systems. Subsequently, object positions obtained from localization radiographs may be offset, resulting in greater target positioning uncertainty. While current QA procedures measure kV/MV image agreement, these measurements do not provide insight to apparent isocenter position for either single imaging system as a function of gantry rotation. This study measures offset as a function of gantry angle in kV and MV imaging systems on four treatment machines to investigate the magnitude of systematic offsets and their reproducibility between systems and machines, as well as over time. It is shown that each machine and energy has a reproducible pattern of offset as a function of gantry angle that is independent of kV/MV agreement, and it varies by machine. kV and MV offset ranges are on the order of 1.5 mm in the R/L and A/P directions, and 0.5 mm in the S/I direction. Variability of kV‐MV agreement is on the order of 0.7 mm. At certain angles, combinations of localization images could show a compounded offset of over 2 mm, exceeding the desired certainty threshold. Since these trends are persistent over time for each machine, online correction for image offsets as a function of gantry angle could improve the margin of positioning uncertainty. PACS number: 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57185792018-04-02 Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle Mullins, John P. Herman, Michael G. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Mechanical flex of the gantry and mounted imaging panels leads to systematic offsets in localization image isocenter as a function of gantry angle for linear accelerator‐mounted image guidance systems. Subsequently, object positions obtained from localization radiographs may be offset, resulting in greater target positioning uncertainty. While current QA procedures measure kV/MV image agreement, these measurements do not provide insight to apparent isocenter position for either single imaging system as a function of gantry rotation. This study measures offset as a function of gantry angle in kV and MV imaging systems on four treatment machines to investigate the magnitude of systematic offsets and their reproducibility between systems and machines, as well as over time. It is shown that each machine and energy has a reproducible pattern of offset as a function of gantry angle that is independent of kV/MV agreement, and it varies by machine. kV and MV offset ranges are on the order of 1.5 mm in the R/L and A/P directions, and 0.5 mm in the S/I direction. Variability of kV‐MV agreement is on the order of 0.7 mm. At certain angles, combinations of localization images could show a compounded offset of over 2 mm, exceeding the desired certainty threshold. Since these trends are persistent over time for each machine, online correction for image offsets as a function of gantry angle could improve the margin of positioning uncertainty. PACS number: 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5718579/ /pubmed/21330978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3314 Text en © 2011 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Mullins, John P.
Herman, Michael G.
Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title_full Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title_fullStr Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title_full_unstemmed Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title_short Systematic offset of kV and MV localization systems as a function of gantry angle
title_sort systematic offset of kv and mv localization systems as a function of gantry angle
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21330978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3314
work_keys_str_mv AT mullinsjohnp systematicoffsetofkvandmvlocalizationsystemsasafunctionofgantryangle
AT hermanmichaelg systematicoffsetofkvandmvlocalizationsystemsasafunctionofgantryangle