Cargando…

Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of motion tracking and radiation delivery control of integrated gating systems on a Novalis Tx system. The study was performed on a Novalis Tx system, which is equipped with Varian Real‐time Position Management (RPM) system, and BrainLAB Exac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Zheng, Liu, TongHai, Cai, Jing, Chen, Qing, Wang, Zhiheng, Yin, Fang‐Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3495
_version_ 1783284352348585984
author Chang, Zheng
Liu, TongHai
Cai, Jing
Chen, Qing
Wang, Zhiheng
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_facet Chang, Zheng
Liu, TongHai
Cai, Jing
Chen, Qing
Wang, Zhiheng
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_sort Chang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of motion tracking and radiation delivery control of integrated gating systems on a Novalis Tx system. The study was performed on a Novalis Tx system, which is equipped with Varian Real‐time Position Management (RPM) system, and BrainLAB ExacTrac gating systems. In this study, the two systems were assessed on accuracy of both motion tracking and radiation delivery control. To evaluate motion tracking, two artificial motion profiles and five patients' respiratory profiles were used. The motion trajectories acquired by the two gating systems were compared against the references. To assess radiation delivery control, time delays were measured using a single‐exposure method. More specifically, radiation is delivered with a 4 mm diameter cone within the phase range of 10%–45% for the BrainLAB ExacTrac system, and within the phase range of 0%–25% for the Varian RPM system during expiration, each for three times. Radiochromic films were used to record the radiation exposures and to calculate the time delays. In the work, the discrepancies were quantified using the parameters of mean and standard deviation (SD). Pearson's product‐moment correlational analysis was used to test correlation of the data, which is quantified using a parameter of r. The trajectory profiles acquired by the gating systems show good agreement with those reference profiles. A quantitative analysis shows that the average mean discrepancies between BrainLAB ExacTrac system and known references are 1.5 mm and 1.9 mm for artificial and patient profiles, with the maximum motion amplitude of 28.0 mm. As for the Varian RPM system, the corresponding average mean discrepancies are 1.1 mm and 1.7 mm for artificial and patient profiles. With the proposed single‐exposure method, the time delays are found to be [Formula: see text] seconds and [Formula: see text] seconds for BrainLAB ExacTrac and Varian RPM systems, respectively. The results indicate the systems can track motion and control radiation delivery with reasonable accuracy. The proposed single‐exposure method has been demonstrated to be feasible in measuring time delay efficiently. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd, 87.56.‐v, 87.55.‐x
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57186352018-04-02 Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system Chang, Zheng Liu, TongHai Cai, Jing Chen, Qing Wang, Zhiheng Yin, Fang‐Fang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of motion tracking and radiation delivery control of integrated gating systems on a Novalis Tx system. The study was performed on a Novalis Tx system, which is equipped with Varian Real‐time Position Management (RPM) system, and BrainLAB ExacTrac gating systems. In this study, the two systems were assessed on accuracy of both motion tracking and radiation delivery control. To evaluate motion tracking, two artificial motion profiles and five patients' respiratory profiles were used. The motion trajectories acquired by the two gating systems were compared against the references. To assess radiation delivery control, time delays were measured using a single‐exposure method. More specifically, radiation is delivered with a 4 mm diameter cone within the phase range of 10%–45% for the BrainLAB ExacTrac system, and within the phase range of 0%–25% for the Varian RPM system during expiration, each for three times. Radiochromic films were used to record the radiation exposures and to calculate the time delays. In the work, the discrepancies were quantified using the parameters of mean and standard deviation (SD). Pearson's product‐moment correlational analysis was used to test correlation of the data, which is quantified using a parameter of r. The trajectory profiles acquired by the gating systems show good agreement with those reference profiles. A quantitative analysis shows that the average mean discrepancies between BrainLAB ExacTrac system and known references are 1.5 mm and 1.9 mm for artificial and patient profiles, with the maximum motion amplitude of 28.0 mm. As for the Varian RPM system, the corresponding average mean discrepancies are 1.1 mm and 1.7 mm for artificial and patient profiles. With the proposed single‐exposure method, the time delays are found to be [Formula: see text] seconds and [Formula: see text] seconds for BrainLAB ExacTrac and Varian RPM systems, respectively. The results indicate the systems can track motion and control radiation delivery with reasonable accuracy. The proposed single‐exposure method has been demonstrated to be feasible in measuring time delay efficiently. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd, 87.56.‐v, 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5718635/ /pubmed/21844863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3495 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chang, Zheng
Liu, TongHai
Cai, Jing
Chen, Qing
Wang, Zhiheng
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title_full Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title_fullStr Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title_short Evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a Novalis Tx system
title_sort evaluation of integrated respiratory gating systems on a novalis tx system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3495
work_keys_str_mv AT changzheng evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem
AT liutonghai evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem
AT caijing evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem
AT chenqing evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem
AT wangzhiheng evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem
AT yinfangfang evaluationofintegratedrespiratorygatingsystemsonanovalistxsystem