Cargando…

Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms

In most of the approaches of computer‐aided detection of breast cancer, one of the preprocessing steps applied to the mammogram is the removal/suppression of pectoral muscle, as its presence within the mammogram may adversely affect the outcome of cancer detection processes. Through this study, we p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camilus, K. Santle, Govindan, V. K., Sathidevi, P.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3285
_version_ 1783284353557594112
author Camilus, K. Santle
Govindan, V. K.
Sathidevi, P.S.
author_facet Camilus, K. Santle
Govindan, V. K.
Sathidevi, P.S.
author_sort Camilus, K. Santle
collection PubMed
description In most of the approaches of computer‐aided detection of breast cancer, one of the preprocessing steps applied to the mammogram is the removal/suppression of pectoral muscle, as its presence within the mammogram may adversely affect the outcome of cancer detection processes. Through this study, we propose an efficient automatic method using the watershed transformation for identifying the pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique view mammograms. The watershed transformation of the mammogram shows interesting properties that include the appearance of a unique watershed line corresponding to the pectoral muscle edge. In addition to this, it is observed that the pectoral muscle region is oversegmented due to the existence of several catchment basins within the pectoral muscle. Hence, a suitable merging algorithm is proposed to combine the appropriate catchment basins to obtain the correct pectoral muscle region. A total of 84 mammograms from the mammographic image analysis database were used to validate this approach. The mean false positive and mean false negative rates, obtained by comparing the results of the proposed approach with manually‐identified (ground truth) pectoral muscle boundaries, respectively, were 0.85% and 4.88%. A comparison of the results of the proposed method with related state‐of‐the‐art methods shows that the performance of the proposed approach is better than the existing methods in terms of the mean false negative rate. Using Hausdorff distance metric, the comparison of the results of the proposed method with ground truth shows low Hausdorff distances, the mean and standard deviation being [Formula: see text]. PACS numbers: 87.57.R, 87.57.nm, 87.59.ej, 87.85.Ng, 87.85.Pq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57186412018-04-02 Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms Camilus, K. Santle Govindan, V. K. Sathidevi, P.S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging In most of the approaches of computer‐aided detection of breast cancer, one of the preprocessing steps applied to the mammogram is the removal/suppression of pectoral muscle, as its presence within the mammogram may adversely affect the outcome of cancer detection processes. Through this study, we propose an efficient automatic method using the watershed transformation for identifying the pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique view mammograms. The watershed transformation of the mammogram shows interesting properties that include the appearance of a unique watershed line corresponding to the pectoral muscle edge. In addition to this, it is observed that the pectoral muscle region is oversegmented due to the existence of several catchment basins within the pectoral muscle. Hence, a suitable merging algorithm is proposed to combine the appropriate catchment basins to obtain the correct pectoral muscle region. A total of 84 mammograms from the mammographic image analysis database were used to validate this approach. The mean false positive and mean false negative rates, obtained by comparing the results of the proposed approach with manually‐identified (ground truth) pectoral muscle boundaries, respectively, were 0.85% and 4.88%. A comparison of the results of the proposed method with related state‐of‐the‐art methods shows that the performance of the proposed approach is better than the existing methods in terms of the mean false negative rate. Using Hausdorff distance metric, the comparison of the results of the proposed method with ground truth shows low Hausdorff distances, the mean and standard deviation being [Formula: see text]. PACS numbers: 87.57.R, 87.57.nm, 87.59.ej, 87.85.Ng, 87.85.Pq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5718641/ /pubmed/21844845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3285 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Camilus, K. Santle
Govindan, V. K.
Sathidevi, P.S.
Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title_full Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title_fullStr Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title_full_unstemmed Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title_short Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
title_sort pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3285
work_keys_str_mv AT camilusksantle pectoralmuscleidentificationinmammograms
AT govindanvk pectoralmuscleidentificationinmammograms
AT sathidevips pectoralmuscleidentificationinmammograms