Cargando…
Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516 |
_version_ | 1783284353799815168 |
---|---|
author | Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema Wang, Brian Szegedi, Martin Tward, Jonathan Zhao, Hui Huang, Y. Jessica Sarkar, Vikren Shrieve, Dennis Salter, Bill |
author_facet | Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema Wang, Brian Szegedi, Martin Tward, Jonathan Zhao, Hui Huang, Y. Jessica Sarkar, Vikren Shrieve, Dennis Salter, Bill |
author_sort | Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (CM) planning target volumes (PTV) and PTVs resulting from uniform margins of 5 mm (5M) and 7 mm (7M) were explored. Through retrospective review of each patient's tracking data, an individualized margin (IM) design for each patient was determined. IMRT treatment plans with identical constraints were generated for all four margin strategies and compared. The IM plans generally created the smallest PTV volumes. For similar PTV coverage, the IM plans had a lower mean bladder (rectal) dose by an average of 3.9% (2.5%), 8.5% (5.7%) and 16.2 % (9.8%) compared to 5M, 7M and CM plans, respectively. The IM plan had the lowest gEUD value of 23.8 Gy for bladder, compared to 35.1, 28.4 and 25.7, for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Likewise, the IM plan had the lowest NTCP value for rectum of 0.04, compared to 0.07, 0.06 and 0.05 for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Individualized margins can lead to significantly reduced PTV volumes and critical structure doses, while still ensuring a minimum delivered CTV dose equal to 95% of the prescribed dose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57186422018-04-02 Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema Wang, Brian Szegedi, Martin Tward, Jonathan Zhao, Hui Huang, Y. Jessica Sarkar, Vikren Shrieve, Dennis Salter, Bill J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (CM) planning target volumes (PTV) and PTVs resulting from uniform margins of 5 mm (5M) and 7 mm (7M) were explored. Through retrospective review of each patient's tracking data, an individualized margin (IM) design for each patient was determined. IMRT treatment plans with identical constraints were generated for all four margin strategies and compared. The IM plans generally created the smallest PTV volumes. For similar PTV coverage, the IM plans had a lower mean bladder (rectal) dose by an average of 3.9% (2.5%), 8.5% (5.7%) and 16.2 % (9.8%) compared to 5M, 7M and CM plans, respectively. The IM plan had the lowest gEUD value of 23.8 Gy for bladder, compared to 35.1, 28.4 and 25.7, for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Likewise, the IM plan had the lowest NTCP value for rectum of 0.04, compared to 0.07, 0.06 and 0.05 for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Individualized margins can lead to significantly reduced PTV volumes and critical structure doses, while still ensuring a minimum delivered CTV dose equal to 95% of the prescribed dose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5718642/ /pubmed/21844865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema Wang, Brian Szegedi, Martin Tward, Jonathan Zhao, Hui Huang, Y. Jessica Sarkar, Vikren Shrieve, Dennis Salter, Bill Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title | Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title_full | Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title_fullStr | Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title_full_unstemmed | Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title_short | Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
title_sort | individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rassiahszegediprema individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT wangbrian individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT szegedimartin individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT twardjonathan individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT zhaohui individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT huangyjessica individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT sarkarvikren individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT shrievedennis individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem AT salterbill individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem |