Cargando…

Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system

This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema, Wang, Brian, Szegedi, Martin, Tward, Jonathan, Zhao, Hui, Huang, Y. Jessica, Sarkar, Vikren, Shrieve, Dennis, Salter, Bill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516
_version_ 1783284353799815168
author Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema
Wang, Brian
Szegedi, Martin
Tward, Jonathan
Zhao, Hui
Huang, Y. Jessica
Sarkar, Vikren
Shrieve, Dennis
Salter, Bill
author_facet Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema
Wang, Brian
Szegedi, Martin
Tward, Jonathan
Zhao, Hui
Huang, Y. Jessica
Sarkar, Vikren
Shrieve, Dennis
Salter, Bill
author_sort Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema
collection PubMed
description This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (CM) planning target volumes (PTV) and PTVs resulting from uniform margins of 5 mm (5M) and 7 mm (7M) were explored. Through retrospective review of each patient's tracking data, an individualized margin (IM) design for each patient was determined. IMRT treatment plans with identical constraints were generated for all four margin strategies and compared. The IM plans generally created the smallest PTV volumes. For similar PTV coverage, the IM plans had a lower mean bladder (rectal) dose by an average of 3.9% (2.5%), 8.5% (5.7%) and 16.2 % (9.8%) compared to 5M, 7M and CM plans, respectively. The IM plan had the lowest gEUD value of 23.8 Gy for bladder, compared to 35.1, 28.4 and 25.7, for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Likewise, the IM plan had the lowest NTCP value for rectum of 0.04, compared to 0.07, 0.06 and 0.05 for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Individualized margins can lead to significantly reduced PTV volumes and critical structure doses, while still ensuring a minimum delivered CTV dose equal to 95% of the prescribed dose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57186422018-04-02 Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema Wang, Brian Szegedi, Martin Tward, Jonathan Zhao, Hui Huang, Y. Jessica Sarkar, Vikren Shrieve, Dennis Salter, Bill J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of designing patient‐specific margins for prostate cancer patients based on 4D localization and tracking. Ten prostate patients, each implanted with three radiofrequency transponders, were localized and tracked for 40 fractions. “Conventional margin” (CM) planning target volumes (PTV) and PTVs resulting from uniform margins of 5 mm (5M) and 7 mm (7M) were explored. Through retrospective review of each patient's tracking data, an individualized margin (IM) design for each patient was determined. IMRT treatment plans with identical constraints were generated for all four margin strategies and compared. The IM plans generally created the smallest PTV volumes. For similar PTV coverage, the IM plans had a lower mean bladder (rectal) dose by an average of 3.9% (2.5%), 8.5% (5.7%) and 16.2 % (9.8%) compared to 5M, 7M and CM plans, respectively. The IM plan had the lowest gEUD value of 23.8 Gy for bladder, compared to 35.1, 28.4 and 25.7, for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Likewise, the IM plan had the lowest NTCP value for rectum of 0.04, compared to 0.07, 0.06 and 0.05 for CM, 7M and 5M, respectively. Individualized margins can lead to significantly reduced PTV volumes and critical structure doses, while still ensuring a minimum delivered CTV dose equal to 95% of the prescribed dose. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5718642/ /pubmed/21844865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Rassiah‐Szegedi, Prema
Wang, Brian
Szegedi, Martin
Tward, Jonathan
Zhao, Hui
Huang, Y. Jessica
Sarkar, Vikren
Shrieve, Dennis
Salter, Bill
Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title_full Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title_fullStr Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title_full_unstemmed Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title_short Individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
title_sort individualized margins for prostate patients using a wireless localization and tracking system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3516
work_keys_str_mv AT rassiahszegediprema individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT wangbrian individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT szegedimartin individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT twardjonathan individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT zhaohui individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT huangyjessica individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT sarkarvikren individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT shrievedennis individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem
AT salterbill individualizedmarginsforprostatepatientsusingawirelesslocalizationandtrackingsystem