An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare image quality characteristics for two commonly used and commercially available CBCT systems: the X‐ray Volumetric Imager and the On‐Board Imager. A commonly used CATPHAN image quality phantom was used to measure various image quality parameters, namely, pixel value stability and accuracy, noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), high‐contrast resolution, low contrast resolution and image uniformity. For the XVI unit, we evaluated the image quality for four manufacturer‐supplied protocols as a function of mAs. For the OBI unit, we did the same for the full‐fan and half‐fan scanning modes, which were respectively used with the full bow‐tie and half bow‐tie filters. For XVI, the mean pixel values of regions of interest were found to generally decrease with increasing mAs for all protocols, while they were relatively stable with mAs for OBI. Noise was slightly lower on XVI and was seen to decrease with increasing mAs, while CNR increased with mAs for both systems. For XVI and OBI, the high‐contrast resolution was approximately limited by the pixel resolution of the reconstructed image. On OBI images, up to 6 and 5 discs of 1% and 0.5% contrast, respectively, were visible for a high mAs setting using the full‐fan mode, while none of the discs were clearly visible on the XVI images for various mAs settings when the medium resolution reconstruction was used. In conclusion, image quality parameters for XVI and OBI have been quantified and compared for clinical protocols under various mAs settings. These results need to be viewed in the context of a recent study that reported the dose‐mAs relationship for the two systems and found that OBI generally delivered higher imaging doses than XVI. ((1)) PACS numbers: 85.57.C‐, 85.57.cj, 85.57.cm, 85.57.cf