Cargando…
Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260 |
_version_ | 1783284359681277952 |
---|---|
author | Das, Saikat Isiah, Rajesh Rajesh, B. Ravindran, B. Paul Singh, Rabi Raja Backianathan, Selvamani Subhashini, J. |
author_facet | Das, Saikat Isiah, Rajesh Rajesh, B. Ravindran, B. Paul Singh, Rabi Raja Backianathan, Selvamani Subhashini, J. |
author_sort | Das, Saikat |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin between clinical target volume to planning target volume based on systematic and random errors. Daily relocation error was measured using depth helmet and measuring probe. Based on the measurements, translational displacements in anteroposterior (z), mediolateral (x), and craniocaudal (y) directions were calculated. Based on the displacements in x, y and z directions, systematic and random error were calculated and three‐dimensional radial displacement vector was determined. Systematic and random errors were used to derive CTV to PTV margin. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in 99.2% cases in anteroposterior direction (AP), in 99.6% cases in mediolateral direction (ML), and in 97.6% cases in craniocaudal direction (CC). In AP, ML and CC directions, systematic errors were 0.56, 0.38, 0.42 mm and random errors were 1.86, 1.36 and 0.73 mm, respectively. Mean radial displacement was 1.03 mm [Formula: see text]. CTV to PTV margins calculated by ICRU formula were 1.86, 1.45 and 0.93 mm; by Stroom's formula they were 2.42, 1.74 and 1.35 mm; by van Herk's formula they were 2.7, 1.93 and 1.56 mm (AP, ML and CC directions). Depth helmet with measuring probe provides a clinically viable way for assessing the relocation accuracy of GTC frame. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in all directions. Systematic and random errors were more along the anteroposterior axes. According to the ICRU formula, a margin of 2 mm around the tumor seems to be adequate. PACS number: 87.55.‐x |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57186662018-04-02 Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame Das, Saikat Isiah, Rajesh Rajesh, B. Ravindran, B. Paul Singh, Rabi Raja Backianathan, Selvamani Subhashini, J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin between clinical target volume to planning target volume based on systematic and random errors. Daily relocation error was measured using depth helmet and measuring probe. Based on the measurements, translational displacements in anteroposterior (z), mediolateral (x), and craniocaudal (y) directions were calculated. Based on the displacements in x, y and z directions, systematic and random error were calculated and three‐dimensional radial displacement vector was determined. Systematic and random errors were used to derive CTV to PTV margin. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in 99.2% cases in anteroposterior direction (AP), in 99.6% cases in mediolateral direction (ML), and in 97.6% cases in craniocaudal direction (CC). In AP, ML and CC directions, systematic errors were 0.56, 0.38, 0.42 mm and random errors were 1.86, 1.36 and 0.73 mm, respectively. Mean radial displacement was 1.03 mm [Formula: see text]. CTV to PTV margins calculated by ICRU formula were 1.86, 1.45 and 0.93 mm; by Stroom's formula they were 2.42, 1.74 and 1.35 mm; by van Herk's formula they were 2.7, 1.93 and 1.56 mm (AP, ML and CC directions). Depth helmet with measuring probe provides a clinically viable way for assessing the relocation accuracy of GTC frame. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in all directions. Systematic and random errors were more along the anteroposterior axes. According to the ICRU formula, a margin of 2 mm around the tumor seems to be adequate. PACS number: 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5718666/ /pubmed/21587166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Das, Saikat Isiah, Rajesh Rajesh, B. Ravindran, B. Paul Singh, Rabi Raja Backianathan, Selvamani Subhashini, J. Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title | Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title_full | Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title_short | Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame |
title_sort | accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (ctv) to planning target volume (ptv) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable gill‐thomas‐cosman (gtc) frame |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dassaikat accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT isiahrajesh accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT rajeshb accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT ravindranbpaul accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT singhrabiraja accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT backianathanselvamani accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe AT subhashinij accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe |