Cargando…

Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame

The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Saikat, Isiah, Rajesh, Rajesh, B., Ravindran, B. Paul, Singh, Rabi Raja, Backianathan, Selvamani, Subhashini, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260
_version_ 1783284359681277952
author Das, Saikat
Isiah, Rajesh
Rajesh, B.
Ravindran, B. Paul
Singh, Rabi Raja
Backianathan, Selvamani
Subhashini, J.
author_facet Das, Saikat
Isiah, Rajesh
Rajesh, B.
Ravindran, B. Paul
Singh, Rabi Raja
Backianathan, Selvamani
Subhashini, J.
author_sort Das, Saikat
collection PubMed
description The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin between clinical target volume to planning target volume based on systematic and random errors. Daily relocation error was measured using depth helmet and measuring probe. Based on the measurements, translational displacements in anteroposterior (z), mediolateral (x), and craniocaudal (y) directions were calculated. Based on the displacements in x, y and z directions, systematic and random error were calculated and three‐dimensional radial displacement vector was determined. Systematic and random errors were used to derive CTV to PTV margin. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in 99.2% cases in anteroposterior direction (AP), in 99.6% cases in mediolateral direction (ML), and in 97.6% cases in craniocaudal direction (CC). In AP, ML and CC directions, systematic errors were 0.56, 0.38, 0.42 mm and random errors were 1.86, 1.36 and 0.73 mm, respectively. Mean radial displacement was 1.03 mm [Formula: see text]. CTV to PTV margins calculated by ICRU formula were 1.86, 1.45 and 0.93 mm; by Stroom's formula they were 2.42, 1.74 and 1.35 mm; by van Herk's formula they were 2.7, 1.93 and 1.56 mm (AP, ML and CC directions). Depth helmet with measuring probe provides a clinically viable way for assessing the relocation accuracy of GTC frame. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in all directions. Systematic and random errors were more along the anteroposterior axes. According to the ICRU formula, a margin of 2 mm around the tumor seems to be adequate. PACS number: 87.55.‐x
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57186662018-04-02 Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame Das, Saikat Isiah, Rajesh Rajesh, B. Ravindran, B. Paul Singh, Rabi Raja Backianathan, Selvamani Subhashini, J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin between clinical target volume to planning target volume based on systematic and random errors. Daily relocation error was measured using depth helmet and measuring probe. Based on the measurements, translational displacements in anteroposterior (z), mediolateral (x), and craniocaudal (y) directions were calculated. Based on the displacements in x, y and z directions, systematic and random error were calculated and three‐dimensional radial displacement vector was determined. Systematic and random errors were used to derive CTV to PTV margin. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in 99.2% cases in anteroposterior direction (AP), in 99.6% cases in mediolateral direction (ML), and in 97.6% cases in craniocaudal direction (CC). In AP, ML and CC directions, systematic errors were 0.56, 0.38, 0.42 mm and random errors were 1.86, 1.36 and 0.73 mm, respectively. Mean radial displacement was 1.03 mm [Formula: see text]. CTV to PTV margins calculated by ICRU formula were 1.86, 1.45 and 0.93 mm; by Stroom's formula they were 2.42, 1.74 and 1.35 mm; by van Herk's formula they were 2.7, 1.93 and 1.56 mm (AP, ML and CC directions). Depth helmet with measuring probe provides a clinically viable way for assessing the relocation accuracy of GTC frame. The errors were within [Formula: see text] in all directions. Systematic and random errors were more along the anteroposterior axes. According to the ICRU formula, a margin of 2 mm around the tumor seems to be adequate. PACS number: 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5718666/ /pubmed/21587166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260 Text en © 2011 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Das, Saikat
Isiah, Rajesh
Rajesh, B.
Ravindran, B. Paul
Singh, Rabi Raja
Backianathan, Selvamani
Subhashini, J.
Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title_full Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title_fullStr Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title_short Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame
title_sort accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (ctv) to planning target volume (ptv) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable gill‐thomas‐cosman (gtc) frame
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260
work_keys_str_mv AT dassaikat accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT isiahrajesh accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT rajeshb accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT ravindranbpaul accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT singhrabiraja accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT backianathanselvamani accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe
AT subhashinij accuracyofrelocationevaluationofgeometricuncertaintiesandclinicaltargetvolumectvtoplanningtargetvolumeptvmargininfractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyforintracranialtumorsusingrelocatablegillthomascosmangtcframe