Cargando…
Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA
For intensity‐modulated radiation therapy, evaluation of the measured dose against the treatment planning calculated dose is essential in the context of patient‐specific quality assurance. The complexity of volumetric arc radiotherapy delivery attributed to its dynamic and synchronization nature req...
Autores principales: | Chandraraj, Varatharaj, Stathakis, Sotirios, Manickam, Ravikumar, Esquivel, Carlos, Supe, Sanjay S., Papanikolaou, Nikos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3367 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods
por: Chandraraj, Varatharaj, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Investigation of error detection capabilities of phantom, EPID and MLC log file based IMRT QA methods
por: Defoor, Dewayne L., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Lung SBRT: dosimetric and delivery comparison of RapidArc, TomoTherapy, and IMRT
por: Weyh, Ashleigh, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and tomotherapy
por: Oliver, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT
por: Calvo, Oscar I., et al.
Publicado: (2012)