Cargando…

Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology

In the past 10 years, techniques to improve radiotherapy delivery, such as intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for both inter‐ and intrafraction tumor localization, and hypofractionated delivery techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Amish P., Kupelian, Patrick A., Willoughby, Twyla R., Meeks, Sanford L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3590
_version_ 1783284373653553152
author Shah, Amish P.
Kupelian, Patrick A.
Willoughby, Twyla R.
Meeks, Sanford L.
author_facet Shah, Amish P.
Kupelian, Patrick A.
Willoughby, Twyla R.
Meeks, Sanford L.
author_sort Shah, Amish P.
collection PubMed
description In the past 10 years, techniques to improve radiotherapy delivery, such as intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for both inter‐ and intrafraction tumor localization, and hypofractionated delivery techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), have evolved tremendously. This review article focuses on only one part of that evolution, electromagnetic tracking in radiation therapy. Electromagnetic tracking is still a growing technology in radiation oncology and, as such, the clinical applications are limited, the expense is high, and the reimbursement is insufficient to cover these costs. At the same time, current experience with electromagnetic tracking applied to various clinical tumor sites indicates that the potential benefits of electromagnetic tracking could be significant for patients receiving radiation therapy. Daily use of these tracking systems is minimally invasive and delivers no additional ionizing radiation to the patient, and these systems can provide explicit tumor motion data. Although there are a number of technical and fiscal issues that need to be addressed, electromagnetic tracking systems are expected to play a continued role in improving the precision of radiation delivery. PACS number: 87.63.‐d
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57187352018-04-02 Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology Shah, Amish P. Kupelian, Patrick A. Willoughby, Twyla R. Meeks, Sanford L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In the past 10 years, techniques to improve radiotherapy delivery, such as intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for both inter‐ and intrafraction tumor localization, and hypofractionated delivery techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), have evolved tremendously. This review article focuses on only one part of that evolution, electromagnetic tracking in radiation therapy. Electromagnetic tracking is still a growing technology in radiation oncology and, as such, the clinical applications are limited, the expense is high, and the reimbursement is insufficient to cover these costs. At the same time, current experience with electromagnetic tracking applied to various clinical tumor sites indicates that the potential benefits of electromagnetic tracking could be significant for patients receiving radiation therapy. Daily use of these tracking systems is minimally invasive and delivers no additional ionizing radiation to the patient, and these systems can provide explicit tumor motion data. Although there are a number of technical and fiscal issues that need to be addressed, electromagnetic tracking systems are expected to play a continued role in improving the precision of radiation delivery. PACS number: 87.63.‐d John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5718735/ /pubmed/22089017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3590 Text en © 2011 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Shah, Amish P.
Kupelian, Patrick A.
Willoughby, Twyla R.
Meeks, Sanford L.
Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title_full Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title_fullStr Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title_full_unstemmed Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title_short Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
title_sort expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3590
work_keys_str_mv AT shahamishp expandingtheuseofrealtimeelectromagnetictrackinginradiationoncology
AT kupelianpatricka expandingtheuseofrealtimeelectromagnetictrackinginradiationoncology
AT willoughbytwylar expandingtheuseofrealtimeelectromagnetictrackinginradiationoncology
AT meekssanfordl expandingtheuseofrealtimeelectromagnetictrackinginradiationoncology