Cargando…

The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer

We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jong Min, Choi, Chang Heon, Ha, Sung Whan, Ye, Sung‐Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563
_version_ 1783284378204372992
author Park, Jong Min
Choi, Chang Heon
Ha, Sung Whan
Ye, Sung‐Joon
author_facet Park, Jong Min
Choi, Chang Heon
Ha, Sung Whan
Ye, Sung‐Joon
author_sort Park, Jong Min
collection PubMed
description We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams. All the planning parameters, goals, and constraints were set to be identical except beam energy. The dose distributions were similar in terms of target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity regardless of beam energy. The [Formula: see text] of rectal wall in 6 MV, 15 MV and mixed‐energy plans was 16.7%, 17.9%, and 16.3%, respectively, while [Formula: see text] was 55.6%, 53.2%, and 50%. The mean dose to femoral heads in 6 MV, 15 MV, and mixed‐energy plans were 31.7 Gy, 26.3 Gy, and 26.2 Gy, respectively. The integral dose of 6 MV plans was 7% larger than those of 15 MV or mixed‐energy plans. These results indicated that mixed‐energy IMRT plans could take advantage of the dosimetric characteristics of low‐ and high‐energy beams. Even though the reduction of dose to the organs at risk may not be clinically relevant, mixing energy in an IMRT plan for deep‐seated tumors can improve the overall plan quality. PACS number: 87.55.ne
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57187522018-04-02 The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer Park, Jong Min Choi, Chang Heon Ha, Sung Whan Ye, Sung‐Joon J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams. All the planning parameters, goals, and constraints were set to be identical except beam energy. The dose distributions were similar in terms of target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity regardless of beam energy. The [Formula: see text] of rectal wall in 6 MV, 15 MV and mixed‐energy plans was 16.7%, 17.9%, and 16.3%, respectively, while [Formula: see text] was 55.6%, 53.2%, and 50%. The mean dose to femoral heads in 6 MV, 15 MV, and mixed‐energy plans were 31.7 Gy, 26.3 Gy, and 26.2 Gy, respectively. The integral dose of 6 MV plans was 7% larger than those of 15 MV or mixed‐energy plans. These results indicated that mixed‐energy IMRT plans could take advantage of the dosimetric characteristics of low‐ and high‐energy beams. Even though the reduction of dose to the organs at risk may not be clinically relevant, mixing energy in an IMRT plan for deep‐seated tumors can improve the overall plan quality. PACS number: 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5718752/ /pubmed/22089013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563 Text en © 2011 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Park, Jong Min
Choi, Chang Heon
Ha, Sung Whan
Ye, Sung‐Joon
The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title_full The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title_fullStr The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title_short The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
title_sort dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy imrt plans for prostate cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjongmin thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT choichangheon thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT hasungwhan thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT yesungjoon thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT parkjongmin dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT choichangheon dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT hasungwhan dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer
AT yesungjoon dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer