Cargando…
The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer
We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563 |
_version_ | 1783284378204372992 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jong Min Choi, Chang Heon Ha, Sung Whan Ye, Sung‐Joon |
author_facet | Park, Jong Min Choi, Chang Heon Ha, Sung Whan Ye, Sung‐Joon |
author_sort | Park, Jong Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams. All the planning parameters, goals, and constraints were set to be identical except beam energy. The dose distributions were similar in terms of target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity regardless of beam energy. The [Formula: see text] of rectal wall in 6 MV, 15 MV and mixed‐energy plans was 16.7%, 17.9%, and 16.3%, respectively, while [Formula: see text] was 55.6%, 53.2%, and 50%. The mean dose to femoral heads in 6 MV, 15 MV, and mixed‐energy plans were 31.7 Gy, 26.3 Gy, and 26.2 Gy, respectively. The integral dose of 6 MV plans was 7% larger than those of 15 MV or mixed‐energy plans. These results indicated that mixed‐energy IMRT plans could take advantage of the dosimetric characteristics of low‐ and high‐energy beams. Even though the reduction of dose to the organs at risk may not be clinically relevant, mixing energy in an IMRT plan for deep‐seated tumors can improve the overall plan quality. PACS number: 87.55.ne |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57187522018-04-02 The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer Park, Jong Min Choi, Chang Heon Ha, Sung Whan Ye, Sung‐Joon J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We investigated the effect of mixing high‐ and low‐energy photon beams on the quality of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for patients with prostate cancer. Three different plans for each of twenty patients were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MV alone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams. All the planning parameters, goals, and constraints were set to be identical except beam energy. The dose distributions were similar in terms of target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity regardless of beam energy. The [Formula: see text] of rectal wall in 6 MV, 15 MV and mixed‐energy plans was 16.7%, 17.9%, and 16.3%, respectively, while [Formula: see text] was 55.6%, 53.2%, and 50%. The mean dose to femoral heads in 6 MV, 15 MV, and mixed‐energy plans were 31.7 Gy, 26.3 Gy, and 26.2 Gy, respectively. The integral dose of 6 MV plans was 7% larger than those of 15 MV or mixed‐energy plans. These results indicated that mixed‐energy IMRT plans could take advantage of the dosimetric characteristics of low‐ and high‐energy beams. Even though the reduction of dose to the organs at risk may not be clinically relevant, mixing energy in an IMRT plan for deep‐seated tumors can improve the overall plan quality. PACS number: 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2011-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5718752/ /pubmed/22089013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563 Text en © 2011 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Park, Jong Min Choi, Chang Heon Ha, Sung Whan Ye, Sung‐Joon The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title | The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title_full | The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title_short | The dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer |
title_sort | dosimetric effect of mixed‐energy imrt plans for prostate cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjongmin thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT choichangheon thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT hasungwhan thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT yesungjoon thedosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT parkjongmin dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT choichangheon dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT hasungwhan dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer AT yesungjoon dosimetriceffectofmixedenergyimrtplansforprostatecancer |