Cargando…

The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Ryosuke, Hirasawa, Kingo, Ikeda, Ryosuke, de Fukuchi, Takeh, Ishii, Yasuaki, Kaneko, Hiroaki, Makazu, Makomo, Sato, Chiko, Maeda, Shin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003
_version_ 1783284407696621568
author Kobayashi, Ryosuke
Hirasawa, Kingo
Ikeda, Ryosuke
de Fukuchi, Takeh
Ishii, Yasuaki
Kaneko, Hiroaki
Makazu, Makomo
Sato, Chiko
Maeda, Shin
author_facet Kobayashi, Ryosuke
Hirasawa, Kingo
Ikeda, Ryosuke
de Fukuchi, Takeh
Ishii, Yasuaki
Kaneko, Hiroaki
Makazu, Makomo
Sato, Chiko
Maeda, Shin
author_sort Kobayashi, Ryosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD. METHODS:  This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS : In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P  < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P  < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS : ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57189102017-12-07 The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue Kobayashi, Ryosuke Hirasawa, Kingo Ikeda, Ryosuke de Fukuchi, Takeh Ishii, Yasuaki Kaneko, Hiroaki Makazu, Makomo Sato, Chiko Maeda, Shin Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD. METHODS:  This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS : In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P  < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P  < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS : ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-12 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718910/ /pubmed/29218316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Kobayashi, Ryosuke
Hirasawa, Kingo
Ikeda, Ryosuke
de Fukuchi, Takeh
Ishii, Yasuaki
Kaneko, Hiroaki
Makazu, Makomo
Sato, Chiko
Maeda, Shin
The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title_full The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title_fullStr The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title_short The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
title_sort feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashiryosuke thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT hirasawakingo thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT ikedaryosuke thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT defukuchitakeh thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT ishiiyasuaki thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT kanekohiroaki thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT makazumakomo thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT satochiko thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT maedashin thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT kobayashiryosuke feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT hirasawakingo feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT ikedaryosuke feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT defukuchitakeh feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT ishiiyasuaki feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT kanekohiroaki feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT makazumakomo feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT satochiko feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue
AT maedashin feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue