Cargando…
The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003 |
_version_ | 1783284407696621568 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Ryosuke Hirasawa, Kingo Ikeda, Ryosuke de Fukuchi, Takeh Ishii, Yasuaki Kaneko, Hiroaki Makazu, Makomo Sato, Chiko Maeda, Shin |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Ryosuke Hirasawa, Kingo Ikeda, Ryosuke de Fukuchi, Takeh Ishii, Yasuaki Kaneko, Hiroaki Makazu, Makomo Sato, Chiko Maeda, Shin |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Ryosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS : In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS : ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57189102017-12-07 The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue Kobayashi, Ryosuke Hirasawa, Kingo Ikeda, Ryosuke de Fukuchi, Takeh Ishii, Yasuaki Kaneko, Hiroaki Makazu, Makomo Sato, Chiko Maeda, Shin Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS : In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS : ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-12 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718910/ /pubmed/29218316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Kobayashi, Ryosuke Hirasawa, Kingo Ikeda, Ryosuke de Fukuchi, Takeh Ishii, Yasuaki Kaneko, Hiroaki Makazu, Makomo Sato, Chiko Maeda, Shin The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title | The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title_full | The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title_fullStr | The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title_full_unstemmed | The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title_short | The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
title_sort | feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashiryosuke thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT hirasawakingo thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT ikedaryosuke thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT defukuchitakeh thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT ishiiyasuaki thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT kanekohiroaki thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT makazumakomo thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT satochiko thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT maedashin thefeasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT kobayashiryosuke feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT hirasawakingo feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT ikedaryosuke feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT defukuchitakeh feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT ishiiyasuaki feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT kanekohiroaki feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT makazumakomo feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT satochiko feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue AT maedashin feasibilityofcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforthetreatmentofresidualorrecurrenttumorlocalizedintherapeuticscartissue |