Cargando…

Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: To develop outcome measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. DESIGN: Mixed methods, including qualitative interviews and data extraction from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Two university-teaching NHS hospitals and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elliott, Daisy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016155
_version_ 1783284460480888832
author Elliott, Daisy
author_facet Elliott, Daisy
author_sort Elliott, Daisy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop outcome measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. DESIGN: Mixed methods, including qualitative interviews and data extraction from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Two university-teaching NHS hospitals and three district NHS hospitals in the South West and Midlands regions of England. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients and 15 healthcare professionals from abdominal general surgical specialities and obstetrics (caesarean section). METHODS: Measures were developed according to standard guidelines to identify issues relevant to patients’ experiences of surgical wounds and dressings, including analysis of existing RCT outcomes and semi-structured interviews. These were written into provisional questionnaire items for a single outcome measure. Cognitive interviews with patients and healthcare professionals assessed face validity, acceptability and relevance. Findings from interviews were regularly shared with the study team who suggested amendments to modify and reword items to improve understanding before further iterative testing with patients and healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Analyses of existing RCT outcomes and interviews produced a total of 69 issues. Pretesting and iterative revision established the need for two separate measures. One measure addresses healthcare professionals’ experience of wound management in two key areas: exudate and its impact, and allergic reactions to the dressing. The other measure addresses patients’ experience of wounds in seven key areas: wound comfort, dressing removal, dressings to protect the wound, impact on daily activities, ease of movement, anxiety about the wound and satisfaction with dressing. Each measure took less than five min to complete and both were understood and acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: This in-depth study has developed two measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. Further work to test their validity, reliability and application to other settings is now required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: HTA - 12/200/04; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5719294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57192942017-12-08 Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study Elliott, Daisy BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To develop outcome measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. DESIGN: Mixed methods, including qualitative interviews and data extraction from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Two university-teaching NHS hospitals and three district NHS hospitals in the South West and Midlands regions of England. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients and 15 healthcare professionals from abdominal general surgical specialities and obstetrics (caesarean section). METHODS: Measures were developed according to standard guidelines to identify issues relevant to patients’ experiences of surgical wounds and dressings, including analysis of existing RCT outcomes and semi-structured interviews. These were written into provisional questionnaire items for a single outcome measure. Cognitive interviews with patients and healthcare professionals assessed face validity, acceptability and relevance. Findings from interviews were regularly shared with the study team who suggested amendments to modify and reword items to improve understanding before further iterative testing with patients and healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Analyses of existing RCT outcomes and interviews produced a total of 69 issues. Pretesting and iterative revision established the need for two separate measures. One measure addresses healthcare professionals’ experience of wound management in two key areas: exudate and its impact, and allergic reactions to the dressing. The other measure addresses patients’ experience of wounds in seven key areas: wound comfort, dressing removal, dressings to protect the wound, impact on daily activities, ease of movement, anxiety about the wound and satisfaction with dressing. Each measure took less than five min to complete and both were understood and acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: This in-depth study has developed two measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. Further work to test their validity, reliability and application to other settings is now required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: HTA - 12/200/04; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5719294/ /pubmed/29180591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016155 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Elliott, Daisy
Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title_full Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title_short Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
title_sort developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016155
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottdaisy developingoutcomemeasuresassessingwoundmanagementandpatientexperienceamixedmethodsstudy