Cargando…

Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards

OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pannick, Samuel, Archer, Stephanie, Johnston, Maximillian J, Beveridge, Iain, Long, Susannah Jane, Athanasiou, Thanos, Sevdalis, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401
_version_ 1783284534525034496
author Pannick, Samuel
Archer, Stephanie
Johnston, Maximillian J
Beveridge, Iain
Long, Susannah Jane
Athanasiou, Thanos
Sevdalis, Nick
author_facet Pannick, Samuel
Archer, Stephanie
Johnston, Maximillian J
Beveridge, Iain
Long, Susannah Jane
Athanasiou, Thanos
Sevdalis, Nick
author_sort Pannick, Samuel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback. Eighteen months of ethnography and two focus groups were conducted with staff taking part in a trial of PCTS. RESULTS: PCTS fostered psychological safety—a confidence that the team would not embarrass or punish those who speak up. This was complemented by a hard edge of accountability, whereby team members would regulate their own behaviour in anticipation of future briefings. Frontline concerns were triaged to managers, or resolved autonomously by ward teams, reversing what had been well-established normalisations of deviance. Junior clinicians found a degree of catharsis in airing their concerns, and their teams became more proactive in addressing improvement opportunities. PCTS generated tangible organisational changes, and enabled managers to make a convincing case for investment. However, briefings were constrained by the need to preserve professional credibility, and staff found some comfort in avoiding accountability. At higher organisational levels, frontline concerns were subject to competition with other priorities, and their resolution was limited by the scale of the challenges they described. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective safety strategies relying on staff-volunteered data produce acceptable, negotiated accounts, subject to the many interdisciplinary tensions that characterise ward work. Nonetheless, these strategies give managers access to the realities of frontline cares, and support frontline staff to make incremental changes in their daily work. These are goals for learning healthcare organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 34806867.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5719651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57196512017-12-08 Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards Pannick, Samuel Archer, Stephanie Johnston, Maximillian J Beveridge, Iain Long, Susannah Jane Athanasiou, Thanos Sevdalis, Nick BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback. Eighteen months of ethnography and two focus groups were conducted with staff taking part in a trial of PCTS. RESULTS: PCTS fostered psychological safety—a confidence that the team would not embarrass or punish those who speak up. This was complemented by a hard edge of accountability, whereby team members would regulate their own behaviour in anticipation of future briefings. Frontline concerns were triaged to managers, or resolved autonomously by ward teams, reversing what had been well-established normalisations of deviance. Junior clinicians found a degree of catharsis in airing their concerns, and their teams became more proactive in addressing improvement opportunities. PCTS generated tangible organisational changes, and enabled managers to make a convincing case for investment. However, briefings were constrained by the need to preserve professional credibility, and staff found some comfort in avoiding accountability. At higher organisational levels, frontline concerns were subject to competition with other priorities, and their resolution was limited by the scale of the challenges they described. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective safety strategies relying on staff-volunteered data produce acceptable, negotiated accounts, subject to the many interdisciplinary tensions that characterise ward work. Nonetheless, these strategies give managers access to the realities of frontline cares, and support frontline staff to make incremental changes in their daily work. These are goals for learning healthcare organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 34806867. BMJ Open 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5719651/ /pubmed/28385912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Pannick, Samuel
Archer, Stephanie
Johnston, Maximillian J
Beveridge, Iain
Long, Susannah Jane
Athanasiou, Thanos
Sevdalis, Nick
Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title_full Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title_fullStr Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title_full_unstemmed Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title_short Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
title_sort translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401
work_keys_str_mv AT pannicksamuel translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT archerstephanie translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT johnstonmaximillianj translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT beveridgeiain translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT longsusannahjane translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT athanasiouthanos translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards
AT sevdalisnick translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards