Cargando…
Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards
OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401 |
_version_ | 1783284534525034496 |
---|---|
author | Pannick, Samuel Archer, Stephanie Johnston, Maximillian J Beveridge, Iain Long, Susannah Jane Athanasiou, Thanos Sevdalis, Nick |
author_facet | Pannick, Samuel Archer, Stephanie Johnston, Maximillian J Beveridge, Iain Long, Susannah Jane Athanasiou, Thanos Sevdalis, Nick |
author_sort | Pannick, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback. Eighteen months of ethnography and two focus groups were conducted with staff taking part in a trial of PCTS. RESULTS: PCTS fostered psychological safety—a confidence that the team would not embarrass or punish those who speak up. This was complemented by a hard edge of accountability, whereby team members would regulate their own behaviour in anticipation of future briefings. Frontline concerns were triaged to managers, or resolved autonomously by ward teams, reversing what had been well-established normalisations of deviance. Junior clinicians found a degree of catharsis in airing their concerns, and their teams became more proactive in addressing improvement opportunities. PCTS generated tangible organisational changes, and enabled managers to make a convincing case for investment. However, briefings were constrained by the need to preserve professional credibility, and staff found some comfort in avoiding accountability. At higher organisational levels, frontline concerns were subject to competition with other priorities, and their resolution was limited by the scale of the challenges they described. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective safety strategies relying on staff-volunteered data produce acceptable, negotiated accounts, subject to the many interdisciplinary tensions that characterise ward work. Nonetheless, these strategies give managers access to the realities of frontline cares, and support frontline staff to make incremental changes in their daily work. These are goals for learning healthcare organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 34806867. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5719651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57196512017-12-08 Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards Pannick, Samuel Archer, Stephanie Johnston, Maximillian J Beveridge, Iain Long, Susannah Jane Athanasiou, Thanos Sevdalis, Nick BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To understand how frontline reports of day-to-day care failings might be better translated into improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary team intervention capitalising on the frontline experience of care delivery. Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS) involved structured interdisciplinary briefings to capture challenges in care delivery, facilitated organisational escalation of the issues they identified, and feedback. Eighteen months of ethnography and two focus groups were conducted with staff taking part in a trial of PCTS. RESULTS: PCTS fostered psychological safety—a confidence that the team would not embarrass or punish those who speak up. This was complemented by a hard edge of accountability, whereby team members would regulate their own behaviour in anticipation of future briefings. Frontline concerns were triaged to managers, or resolved autonomously by ward teams, reversing what had been well-established normalisations of deviance. Junior clinicians found a degree of catharsis in airing their concerns, and their teams became more proactive in addressing improvement opportunities. PCTS generated tangible organisational changes, and enabled managers to make a convincing case for investment. However, briefings were constrained by the need to preserve professional credibility, and staff found some comfort in avoiding accountability. At higher organisational levels, frontline concerns were subject to competition with other priorities, and their resolution was limited by the scale of the challenges they described. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective safety strategies relying on staff-volunteered data produce acceptable, negotiated accounts, subject to the many interdisciplinary tensions that characterise ward work. Nonetheless, these strategies give managers access to the realities of frontline cares, and support frontline staff to make incremental changes in their daily work. These are goals for learning healthcare organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 34806867. BMJ Open 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5719651/ /pubmed/28385912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Pannick, Samuel Archer, Stephanie Johnston, Maximillian J Beveridge, Iain Long, Susannah Jane Athanasiou, Thanos Sevdalis, Nick Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title | Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title_full | Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title_fullStr | Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title_full_unstemmed | Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title_short | Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
title_sort | translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pannicksamuel translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT archerstephanie translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT johnstonmaximillianj translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT beveridgeiain translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT longsusannahjane translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT athanasiouthanos translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards AT sevdalisnick translatingconcernsintoactionadetailedqualitativeevaluationofaninterdisciplinaryinterventiononmedicalwards |