Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purewal, S., Chapman, S. C. E., van den Akker, O. B. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z
_version_ 1783284548907302912
author Purewal, S.
Chapman, S. C. E.
van den Akker, O. B. A.
author_facet Purewal, S.
Chapman, S. C. E.
van den Akker, O. B. A.
author_sort Purewal, S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct databases. Data retrieved were analysed using a random effects model to estimate standardised mean differences. RESULTS: Of the 22 included studies, 18 investigated depression, 15 state anxiety, and seven trait anxiety. Data from 4018 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that women who achieved pregnancy or a live birth reported lower levels of depression pre-treatment than those who did not, although the effects were small d = − 0.177 (95% CI − 0.327 to − 0.027, z = 2.309, p = 0.021). These results were consistent under different methodological conditions and the quality of these observational were graded as satisfactory. A similar pattern was seen for state (d = − 0.096, 95% CI − 0.180 to − 0.012: z = 2.241, p = 0.025) and trait anxiety (d = −  0.188, 95% CI − 0.007 to 0.356, z = 2.181, p = 0.029). More research is needed to investigate the impact of psychological variables on assisted reproductive technologies outcomes and moderator influences during assisted reproductive technologies processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5719749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57197492017-12-11 A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies Purewal, S. Chapman, S. C. E. van den Akker, O. B. A. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct databases. Data retrieved were analysed using a random effects model to estimate standardised mean differences. RESULTS: Of the 22 included studies, 18 investigated depression, 15 state anxiety, and seven trait anxiety. Data from 4018 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that women who achieved pregnancy or a live birth reported lower levels of depression pre-treatment than those who did not, although the effects were small d = − 0.177 (95% CI − 0.327 to − 0.027, z = 2.309, p = 0.021). These results were consistent under different methodological conditions and the quality of these observational were graded as satisfactory. A similar pattern was seen for state (d = − 0.096, 95% CI − 0.180 to − 0.012: z = 2.241, p = 0.025) and trait anxiety (d = −  0.188, 95% CI − 0.007 to 0.356, z = 2.181, p = 0.029). More research is needed to investigate the impact of psychological variables on assisted reproductive technologies outcomes and moderator influences during assisted reproductive technologies processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5719749/ /pubmed/29212545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Purewal, S.
Chapman, S. C. E.
van den Akker, O. B. A.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z
work_keys_str_mv AT purewals asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT chapmansce asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT vandenakkeroba asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT purewals systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT chapmansce systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT vandenakkeroba systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies