Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct dat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z |
_version_ | 1783284548907302912 |
---|---|
author | Purewal, S. Chapman, S. C. E. van den Akker, O. B. A. |
author_facet | Purewal, S. Chapman, S. C. E. van den Akker, O. B. A. |
author_sort | Purewal, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct databases. Data retrieved were analysed using a random effects model to estimate standardised mean differences. RESULTS: Of the 22 included studies, 18 investigated depression, 15 state anxiety, and seven trait anxiety. Data from 4018 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that women who achieved pregnancy or a live birth reported lower levels of depression pre-treatment than those who did not, although the effects were small d = − 0.177 (95% CI − 0.327 to − 0.027, z = 2.309, p = 0.021). These results were consistent under different methodological conditions and the quality of these observational were graded as satisfactory. A similar pattern was seen for state (d = − 0.096, 95% CI − 0.180 to − 0.012: z = 2.241, p = 0.025) and trait anxiety (d = − 0.188, 95% CI − 0.007 to 0.356, z = 2.181, p = 0.029). More research is needed to investigate the impact of psychological variables on assisted reproductive technologies outcomes and moderator influences during assisted reproductive technologies processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5719749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57197492017-12-11 A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies Purewal, S. Chapman, S. C. E. van den Akker, O. B. A. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated investigation of the effects of depression and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies. A bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Science Direct databases. Data retrieved were analysed using a random effects model to estimate standardised mean differences. RESULTS: Of the 22 included studies, 18 investigated depression, 15 state anxiety, and seven trait anxiety. Data from 4018 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that women who achieved pregnancy or a live birth reported lower levels of depression pre-treatment than those who did not, although the effects were small d = − 0.177 (95% CI − 0.327 to − 0.027, z = 2.309, p = 0.021). These results were consistent under different methodological conditions and the quality of these observational were graded as satisfactory. A similar pattern was seen for state (d = − 0.096, 95% CI − 0.180 to − 0.012: z = 2.241, p = 0.025) and trait anxiety (d = − 0.188, 95% CI − 0.007 to 0.356, z = 2.181, p = 0.029). More research is needed to investigate the impact of psychological variables on assisted reproductive technologies outcomes and moderator influences during assisted reproductive technologies processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5719749/ /pubmed/29212545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Purewal, S. Chapman, S. C. E. van den Akker, O. B. A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purewals asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies AT chapmansce asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies AT vandenakkeroba asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies AT purewals systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies AT chapmansce systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies AT vandenakkeroba systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpsychologicalpredictorsofsuccessfulassistedreproductivetechnologies |