Cargando…
Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain
We performed an initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT planning module for the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system. It was implemented in a multi‐vendor environment, with the other two major components of the delivery chain being MOSAIQ record and verify system (IMPAC Medica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3169 |
_version_ | 1783284553068052480 |
---|---|
author | Feygelman, Vladimir Zhang, Geoffrey Stevens, Craig |
author_facet | Feygelman, Vladimir Zhang, Geoffrey Stevens, Craig |
author_sort | Feygelman, Vladimir |
collection | PubMed |
description | We performed an initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT planning module for the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system. It was implemented in a multi‐vendor environment, with the other two major components of the delivery chain being MOSAIQ record and verify system (IMPAC Medical Systems, Sunnyvale, CA) and a Trilogy linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). A test suite of structure sets and dose objectives provided by the AAPM for multi‐institutional comparison of IMRT dosimetry was used. A total of fifty plans were successfully delivered. The effect of control point spacing on dosimetric accuracy was investigated. When calculated with the 4° spacing, the overall mean point dose errors measured with an ion chamber were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the PTV and OAR, respectively. The γ(3%, 3 mm) passing rate, measured for absolute dose with a biplanar diode array, was [Formula: see text] (range 94.5–99.9%). Ninety percent of the passing rate values were above 97.7%. With the 6° control point spacing, the highly modulated plans exhibited large dosimetric errors (e.g. γ(3%, 3 mm) passing rates below 90% and ion chamber point dose errors of 6–12%), while the results were still acceptable for the simpler cases. The data show that the practical accuracy of the small‐arc approximation, which is at the heart of VMAT dose calculations, depends not only on the control point spacing, but also on the size and relative position of the MLC openings corresponding to the consecutive control points. The effect of the minimum allowed separation between the opposing leaves was found to be minimal. It appears that 4° control point spacing may be a good compromise between calculation speed and accuracy. However each institution is encouraged to establish its own treatment planning guidelines based on the case complexity and acceptable error level. PACS number: 87.55Qr |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5719766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57197662018-04-02 Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain Feygelman, Vladimir Zhang, Geoffrey Stevens, Craig J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We performed an initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT planning module for the Philips Pinnacle treatment planning system. It was implemented in a multi‐vendor environment, with the other two major components of the delivery chain being MOSAIQ record and verify system (IMPAC Medical Systems, Sunnyvale, CA) and a Trilogy linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). A test suite of structure sets and dose objectives provided by the AAPM for multi‐institutional comparison of IMRT dosimetry was used. A total of fifty plans were successfully delivered. The effect of control point spacing on dosimetric accuracy was investigated. When calculated with the 4° spacing, the overall mean point dose errors measured with an ion chamber were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the PTV and OAR, respectively. The γ(3%, 3 mm) passing rate, measured for absolute dose with a biplanar diode array, was [Formula: see text] (range 94.5–99.9%). Ninety percent of the passing rate values were above 97.7%. With the 6° control point spacing, the highly modulated plans exhibited large dosimetric errors (e.g. γ(3%, 3 mm) passing rates below 90% and ion chamber point dose errors of 6–12%), while the results were still acceptable for the simpler cases. The data show that the practical accuracy of the small‐arc approximation, which is at the heart of VMAT dose calculations, depends not only on the control point spacing, but also on the size and relative position of the MLC openings corresponding to the consecutive control points. The effect of the minimum allowed separation between the opposing leaves was found to be minimal. It appears that 4° control point spacing may be a good compromise between calculation speed and accuracy. However each institution is encouraged to establish its own treatment planning guidelines based on the case complexity and acceptable error level. PACS number: 87.55Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5719766/ /pubmed/20160702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3169 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Feygelman, Vladimir Zhang, Geoffrey Stevens, Craig Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title | Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title_full | Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title_fullStr | Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title_short | Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
title_sort | initial dosimetric evaluation of smartarc – a novel vmat treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feygelmanvladimir initialdosimetricevaluationofsmartarcanovelvmattreatmentplanningmoduleimplementedinamultivendordeliverychain AT zhanggeoffrey initialdosimetricevaluationofsmartarcanovelvmattreatmentplanningmoduleimplementedinamultivendordeliverychain AT stevenscraig initialdosimetricevaluationofsmartarcanovelvmattreatmentplanningmoduleimplementedinamultivendordeliverychain |