Cargando…
Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri
A patient dose distribution was calculated by a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code for intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri and compared to previously published Monte Carlo results. A Cs‐137 LDR intracavitary brachytherapy CT data set was chosen from our clinical d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3103 |
_version_ | 1783284555798544384 |
---|---|
author | Gifford, Kent A. Wareing, Todd A. Failla, Gregory Horton, John L. Eifel, Patricia J. Mourtada, Firas |
author_facet | Gifford, Kent A. Wareing, Todd A. Failla, Gregory Horton, John L. Eifel, Patricia J. Mourtada, Firas |
author_sort | Gifford, Kent A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A patient dose distribution was calculated by a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code for intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri and compared to previously published Monte Carlo results. A Cs‐137 LDR intracavitary brachytherapy CT data set was chosen from our clinical database. MCNPX version 2.5.c, was used to calculate the dose distribution. A 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code, Attila version 6.1.1 was used to simulate the same patient. Each patient applicator was built in SolidWorks, a mechanical design package, and then assembled with a coordinate transformation and rotation for the patient. The SolidWorks exported applicator geometry was imported into Attila for calculation. Dose matrices were overlaid on the patient CT data set. Dose volume histograms and point doses were compared. The MCNPX calculation required 14.8 hours, whereas the Attila calculation required 22.2 minutes on a 1.8 GHz AMD Opteron CPU. Agreement between Attila and MCNPX dose calculations at the ICRU 38 points was within [Formula: see text]. Calculated doses to the 2 cc and 5 cc volumes of highest dose differed by not more than [Formula: see text] between the two codes. Dose and DVH overlays agreed well qualitatively. Attila can calculate dose accurately and efficiently for this Cs‐137 CT‐based patient geometry. Our data showed that a three‐group cross‐section set is adequate for Cs‐137 computations. Future work is aimed at implementing an optimized version of Attila for radiotherapy calculations. PACS number: 87.53.Jw |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5719779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57197792018-04-02 Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri Gifford, Kent A. Wareing, Todd A. Failla, Gregory Horton, John L. Eifel, Patricia J. Mourtada, Firas J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A patient dose distribution was calculated by a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code for intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri and compared to previously published Monte Carlo results. A Cs‐137 LDR intracavitary brachytherapy CT data set was chosen from our clinical database. MCNPX version 2.5.c, was used to calculate the dose distribution. A 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code, Attila version 6.1.1 was used to simulate the same patient. Each patient applicator was built in SolidWorks, a mechanical design package, and then assembled with a coordinate transformation and rotation for the patient. The SolidWorks exported applicator geometry was imported into Attila for calculation. Dose matrices were overlaid on the patient CT data set. Dose volume histograms and point doses were compared. The MCNPX calculation required 14.8 hours, whereas the Attila calculation required 22.2 minutes on a 1.8 GHz AMD Opteron CPU. Agreement between Attila and MCNPX dose calculations at the ICRU 38 points was within [Formula: see text]. Calculated doses to the 2 cc and 5 cc volumes of highest dose differed by not more than [Formula: see text] between the two codes. Dose and DVH overlays agreed well qualitatively. Attila can calculate dose accurately and efficiently for this Cs‐137 CT‐based patient geometry. Our data showed that a three‐group cross‐section set is adequate for Cs‐137 computations. Future work is aimed at implementing an optimized version of Attila for radiotherapy calculations. PACS number: 87.53.Jw John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5719779/ /pubmed/20160682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3103 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Gifford, Kent A. Wareing, Todd A. Failla, Gregory Horton, John L. Eifel, Patricia J. Mourtada, Firas Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title | Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title_full | Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title_short | Comparison of a 3D multi‐group [Formula: see text] particle transport code with Monte Carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
title_sort | comparison of a 3d multi‐group [formula: see text] particle transport code with monte carlo for intercavitary brachytherapy of the cervix uteri |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giffordkenta comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri AT wareingtodda comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri AT faillagregory comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri AT hortonjohnl comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri AT eifelpatriciaj comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri AT mourtadafiras comparisonofa3dmultigroupformulaseetextparticletransportcodewithmontecarloforintercavitarybrachytherapyofthecervixuteri |