Cargando…

Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators

Recent improvements to the functionality and stability of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators involve changes that include efficient battery power consumption and radiation hardened electrical circuits. Manufacturers have also pursued MRI‐compatibility for these devices. While suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gossman, Michael S., Graves‐Calhoun, Alison R., Wilkinson, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3115
_version_ 1783284557284376576
author Gossman, Michael S.
Graves‐Calhoun, Alison R.
Wilkinson, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Gossman, Michael S.
Graves‐Calhoun, Alison R.
Wilkinson, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Gossman, Michael S.
collection PubMed
description Recent improvements to the functionality and stability of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators involve changes that include efficient battery power consumption and radiation hardened electrical circuits. Manufacturers have also pursued MRI‐compatibility for these devices. While such newer models of pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators are similar in construction to previously marketed devices – even for the recent MRI‐compatible designs currently in clinical trials – there is increased interest now with regard to radiation therapy dose effects when a device is near or directly in the field of radiation. Specifically, the limitation on dose to the device from therapeutic radiation beams is being investigated for a possible elevation in limiting dose above 200 cGy. We present here the first‐ever study that evaluates dosimetric effects from implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in high energy X‐ray beams from a medical accelerator. Treatment plan simulations were analyzed for four different pacemakers and five different implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators and intercompared with direct measurements from a miniature ionization chamber in water. All defibrillators exhibited the same results and all pacemakers were seen to display the same consequences, within only a [Formula: see text] deviation for all X‐ray energies studied. Attenuation, backscatter, and lateral scatter were determined to be [Formula: see text] , 2.1% and 1.5% at 6 MV, and [Formula: see text] , 3.1% and 5.1% at 18 MV for the defibrillator group. For the pacemaker group, this research showed results of [Formula: see text] , 2.8% and 2.5% at 6 MV, and [Formula: see text] , 3.4% and 5.7% at 18 MV, respectively. Limited results were discovered from scattering processes through computer modeling. Strong verification from measurements was concluded with respect to simulating attenuation characteristics. For IP and ICD leads, measured dose changes were less than 4%, existing as attenuation processes only, and invariant with regard to X‐ray energy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Tf, 87.66.Jj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5719785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57197852018-04-02 Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators Gossman, Michael S. Graves‐Calhoun, Alison R. Wilkinson, Jeffrey D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Recent improvements to the functionality and stability of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators involve changes that include efficient battery power consumption and radiation hardened electrical circuits. Manufacturers have also pursued MRI‐compatibility for these devices. While such newer models of pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators are similar in construction to previously marketed devices – even for the recent MRI‐compatible designs currently in clinical trials – there is increased interest now with regard to radiation therapy dose effects when a device is near or directly in the field of radiation. Specifically, the limitation on dose to the device from therapeutic radiation beams is being investigated for a possible elevation in limiting dose above 200 cGy. We present here the first‐ever study that evaluates dosimetric effects from implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in high energy X‐ray beams from a medical accelerator. Treatment plan simulations were analyzed for four different pacemakers and five different implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators and intercompared with direct measurements from a miniature ionization chamber in water. All defibrillators exhibited the same results and all pacemakers were seen to display the same consequences, within only a [Formula: see text] deviation for all X‐ray energies studied. Attenuation, backscatter, and lateral scatter were determined to be [Formula: see text] , 2.1% and 1.5% at 6 MV, and [Formula: see text] , 3.1% and 5.1% at 18 MV for the defibrillator group. For the pacemaker group, this research showed results of [Formula: see text] , 2.8% and 2.5% at 6 MV, and [Formula: see text] , 3.4% and 5.7% at 18 MV, respectively. Limited results were discovered from scattering processes through computer modeling. Strong verification from measurements was concluded with respect to simulating attenuation characteristics. For IP and ICD leads, measured dose changes were less than 4%, existing as attenuation processes only, and invariant with regard to X‐ray energy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Tf, 87.66.Jj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5719785/ /pubmed/20160685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3115 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Gossman, Michael S.
Graves‐Calhoun, Alison R.
Wilkinson, Jeffrey D.
Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_full Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_fullStr Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_short Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_sort establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3115
work_keys_str_mv AT gossmanmichaels establishingradiationtherapytreatmentplanningeffectsinvolvingimplantablepacemakersandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT gravescalhounalisonr establishingradiationtherapytreatmentplanningeffectsinvolvingimplantablepacemakersandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT wilkinsonjeffreyd establishingradiationtherapytreatmentplanningeffectsinvolvingimplantablepacemakersandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators