Cargando…

Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: So, Hoonsub, Yoo, Su Hyun, Han, Seungbong, Kim, Gwang-un, Seo, Myeongsook, Hwang, Sung Wook, Yang, Dong-Hoon, Byeon, Jeong-Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039
_version_ 1783284579576053760
author So, Hoonsub
Yoo, Su Hyun
Han, Seungbong
Kim, Gwang-un
Seo, Myeongsook
Hwang, Sung Wook
Yang, Dong-Hoon
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
author_facet So, Hoonsub
Yoo, Su Hyun
Han, Seungbong
Kim, Gwang-un
Seo, Myeongsook
Hwang, Sung Wook
Yang, Dong-Hoon
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
author_sort So, Hoonsub
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precut endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-P) used for the management of rectal NET. METHODS: EMR-P was used to treat rectal NET in 72 patients at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Both, circumferential precutting and EMR were performed with the same snare device in all patients. Demographics, procedural details, and histopathological features were reviewed for all cases. RESULTS: Mean size of the tumor measured endoscopically was 6.8±2.8 mm. En bloc and complete resection was achieved in 71 (98.6%) and 67 patients (93.1%), respectively. The mean time required for resection was 9.0±5.6 min. Immediate and delayed bleeding developed in six (8.3%) and 4 patients (5.6%), respectively. Immediate bleeding observed during EMR-P was associated with the risk of delayed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the en bloc and complete resection rates of EMR-P in the treatment of rectal NETs using the same snare for precutting and EMR were noted to be high. The procedure was short and safe. EMR-P may be a good treatment choice for the management of rectal NETs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5719917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57199172017-12-15 Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors So, Hoonsub Yoo, Su Hyun Han, Seungbong Kim, Gwang-un Seo, Myeongsook Hwang, Sung Wook Yang, Dong-Hoon Byeon, Jeong-Sik Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precut endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-P) used for the management of rectal NET. METHODS: EMR-P was used to treat rectal NET in 72 patients at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Both, circumferential precutting and EMR were performed with the same snare device in all patients. Demographics, procedural details, and histopathological features were reviewed for all cases. RESULTS: Mean size of the tumor measured endoscopically was 6.8±2.8 mm. En bloc and complete resection was achieved in 71 (98.6%) and 67 patients (93.1%), respectively. The mean time required for resection was 9.0±5.6 min. Immediate and delayed bleeding developed in six (8.3%) and 4 patients (5.6%), respectively. Immediate bleeding observed during EMR-P was associated with the risk of delayed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the en bloc and complete resection rates of EMR-P in the treatment of rectal NETs using the same snare for precutting and EMR were noted to be high. The procedure was short and safe. EMR-P may be a good treatment choice for the management of rectal NETs. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017-11 2017-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5719917/ /pubmed/29020763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
So, Hoonsub
Yoo, Su Hyun
Han, Seungbong
Kim, Gwang-un
Seo, Myeongsook
Hwang, Sung Wook
Yang, Dong-Hoon
Byeon, Jeong-Sik
Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title_full Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title_fullStr Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title_short Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
title_sort efficacy of precut endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039
work_keys_str_mv AT sohoonsub efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT yoosuhyun efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT hanseungbong efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT kimgwangun efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT seomyeongsook efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT hwangsungwook efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT yangdonghoon efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors
AT byeonjeongsik efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors