Cargando…
Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039 |
_version_ | 1783284579576053760 |
---|---|
author | So, Hoonsub Yoo, Su Hyun Han, Seungbong Kim, Gwang-un Seo, Myeongsook Hwang, Sung Wook Yang, Dong-Hoon Byeon, Jeong-Sik |
author_facet | So, Hoonsub Yoo, Su Hyun Han, Seungbong Kim, Gwang-un Seo, Myeongsook Hwang, Sung Wook Yang, Dong-Hoon Byeon, Jeong-Sik |
author_sort | So, Hoonsub |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precut endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-P) used for the management of rectal NET. METHODS: EMR-P was used to treat rectal NET in 72 patients at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Both, circumferential precutting and EMR were performed with the same snare device in all patients. Demographics, procedural details, and histopathological features were reviewed for all cases. RESULTS: Mean size of the tumor measured endoscopically was 6.8±2.8 mm. En bloc and complete resection was achieved in 71 (98.6%) and 67 patients (93.1%), respectively. The mean time required for resection was 9.0±5.6 min. Immediate and delayed bleeding developed in six (8.3%) and 4 patients (5.6%), respectively. Immediate bleeding observed during EMR-P was associated with the risk of delayed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the en bloc and complete resection rates of EMR-P in the treatment of rectal NETs using the same snare for precutting and EMR were noted to be high. The procedure was short and safe. EMR-P may be a good treatment choice for the management of rectal NETs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5719917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57199172017-12-15 Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors So, Hoonsub Yoo, Su Hyun Han, Seungbong Kim, Gwang-un Seo, Myeongsook Hwang, Sung Wook Yang, Dong-Hoon Byeon, Jeong-Sik Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precut endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-P) used for the management of rectal NET. METHODS: EMR-P was used to treat rectal NET in 72 patients at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Both, circumferential precutting and EMR were performed with the same snare device in all patients. Demographics, procedural details, and histopathological features were reviewed for all cases. RESULTS: Mean size of the tumor measured endoscopically was 6.8±2.8 mm. En bloc and complete resection was achieved in 71 (98.6%) and 67 patients (93.1%), respectively. The mean time required for resection was 9.0±5.6 min. Immediate and delayed bleeding developed in six (8.3%) and 4 patients (5.6%), respectively. Immediate bleeding observed during EMR-P was associated with the risk of delayed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the en bloc and complete resection rates of EMR-P in the treatment of rectal NETs using the same snare for precutting and EMR were noted to be high. The procedure was short and safe. EMR-P may be a good treatment choice for the management of rectal NETs. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017-11 2017-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5719917/ /pubmed/29020763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article So, Hoonsub Yoo, Su Hyun Han, Seungbong Kim, Gwang-un Seo, Myeongsook Hwang, Sung Wook Yang, Dong-Hoon Byeon, Jeong-Sik Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title | Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title_full | Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title_short | Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors |
title_sort | efficacy of precut endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohoonsub efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT yoosuhyun efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT hanseungbong efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT kimgwangun efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT seomyeongsook efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT hwangsungwook efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT yangdonghoon efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT byeonjeongsik efficacyofprecutendoscopicmucosalresectionfortreatmentofrectalneuroendocrinetumors |