Cargando…

Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics

Ancient Greek and 17 century English philosophy are not usually discussed along with the ethics of biometrics and data sharing. Academic ethics today, however, suffers from a lack of background in classical texts. We may discuss whether biometrics and data sharing are consistent with democracy, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Leavitt, Frank J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21380481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.47
_version_ 1783284597666086912
author Leavitt, Frank J.
author_facet Leavitt, Frank J.
author_sort Leavitt, Frank J.
collection PubMed
description Ancient Greek and 17 century English philosophy are not usually discussed along with the ethics of biometrics and data sharing. Academic ethics today, however, suffers from a lack of background in classical texts. We may discuss whether biometrics and data sharing are consistent with democracy, but if we do not know what democracy is, then we cannot know what actions are consistent with it. I shall discuss how and why democracies have restricted the rights of their citizens. I will give the most attention to two paradigms that have most influenced modern democratic thinking: 17 century English democracy and ancient Athens. I do not accept the dogma that the Athenians were obviously wrong to try and then to condemn Socrates. His death-loving doctrine could not but have weakened the will of the youth to work and fight for the good of Athens. I will try to understand the Athenians' point of view and their need to defend their security. At the end, I will apply these lessons to biometrics and data sharing for security reasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57200082017-12-21 Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics Leavitt, Frank J. ScientificWorldJournal Discussion Paper Ancient Greek and 17 century English philosophy are not usually discussed along with the ethics of biometrics and data sharing. Academic ethics today, however, suffers from a lack of background in classical texts. We may discuss whether biometrics and data sharing are consistent with democracy, but if we do not know what democracy is, then we cannot know what actions are consistent with it. I shall discuss how and why democracies have restricted the rights of their citizens. I will give the most attention to two paradigms that have most influenced modern democratic thinking: 17 century English democracy and ancient Athens. I do not accept the dogma that the Athenians were obviously wrong to try and then to condemn Socrates. His death-loving doctrine could not but have weakened the will of the youth to work and fight for the good of Athens. I will try to understand the Athenians' point of view and their need to defend their security. At the end, I will apply these lessons to biometrics and data sharing for security reasons. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5720008/ /pubmed/21380481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.47 Text en Copyright © 2011 Frank J. Leavitt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Discussion Paper
Leavitt, Frank J.
Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title_full Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title_fullStr Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title_full_unstemmed Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title_short Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
title_sort democracies restricting democratic rights: some classical sources and implications for ethics of biometrics
topic Discussion Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21380481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.47
work_keys_str_mv AT leavittfrankj democraciesrestrictingdemocraticrightssomeclassicalsourcesandimplicationsforethicsofbiometrics