Cargando…

Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software

In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pallotta, Stefania, Ceroti, Marco, Bucciolini, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180
_version_ 1783284640663994368
author Pallotta, Stefania
Ceroti, Marco
Bucciolini, Marta
author_facet Pallotta, Stefania
Ceroti, Marco
Bucciolini, Marta
author_sort Pallotta, Stefania
collection PubMed
description In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, the patient positioning will not be accurate. The aim of this work is to assess the intrinsic and the global accuracy of iView and PIPSpro, two widely used registration software programs that implement a manual and a semiautomatic approach, respectively. The intrinsic accuracy was tested using a computer generated phantom, while the overall accuracy was evaluated registering the portal images and the DRRs of an Alderson RANDO phantom. For DRRs, four treatment planning systems (TPS) and three CT studies with different slice thicknesses were considered. This study demonstrates that the intrinsic accuracy of iView and PIPSpro were within 1 pixel and 1°. Using a DRR extracted from a 2 mm CT study, the overall accuracy of both methods was about 2 mm and 1°. When thicker CT slices are considered, the global accuracy of both methods worsens, and differences larger than 1.5° between the rotation parameters estimated with iView and PIPSpro are evident. The results obtained with iView and PIPSpro were nearly equivalent. PACS numbers: 87.57.nj, 87.57.cp
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204012018-04-02 Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software Pallotta, Stefania Ceroti, Marco Bucciolini, Marta J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, the patient positioning will not be accurate. The aim of this work is to assess the intrinsic and the global accuracy of iView and PIPSpro, two widely used registration software programs that implement a manual and a semiautomatic approach, respectively. The intrinsic accuracy was tested using a computer generated phantom, while the overall accuracy was evaluated registering the portal images and the DRRs of an Alderson RANDO phantom. For DRRs, four treatment planning systems (TPS) and three CT studies with different slice thicknesses were considered. This study demonstrates that the intrinsic accuracy of iView and PIPSpro were within 1 pixel and 1°. Using a DRR extracted from a 2 mm CT study, the overall accuracy of both methods was about 2 mm and 1°. When thicker CT slices are considered, the global accuracy of both methods worsens, and differences larger than 1.5° between the rotation parameters estimated with iView and PIPSpro are evident. The results obtained with iView and PIPSpro were nearly equivalent. PACS numbers: 87.57.nj, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5720401/ /pubmed/21081875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Pallotta, Stefania
Ceroti, Marco
Bucciolini, Marta
Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title_full Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title_fullStr Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title_short Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
title_sort accuracy of iview and pipspro registration software
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180
work_keys_str_mv AT pallottastefania accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware
AT cerotimarco accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware
AT bucciolinimarta accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware