Cargando…
Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180 |
_version_ | 1783284640663994368 |
---|---|
author | Pallotta, Stefania Ceroti, Marco Bucciolini, Marta |
author_facet | Pallotta, Stefania Ceroti, Marco Bucciolini, Marta |
author_sort | Pallotta, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, the patient positioning will not be accurate. The aim of this work is to assess the intrinsic and the global accuracy of iView and PIPSpro, two widely used registration software programs that implement a manual and a semiautomatic approach, respectively. The intrinsic accuracy was tested using a computer generated phantom, while the overall accuracy was evaluated registering the portal images and the DRRs of an Alderson RANDO phantom. For DRRs, four treatment planning systems (TPS) and three CT studies with different slice thicknesses were considered. This study demonstrates that the intrinsic accuracy of iView and PIPSpro were within 1 pixel and 1°. Using a DRR extracted from a 2 mm CT study, the overall accuracy of both methods was about 2 mm and 1°. When thicker CT slices are considered, the global accuracy of both methods worsens, and differences larger than 1.5° between the rotation parameters estimated with iView and PIPSpro are evident. The results obtained with iView and PIPSpro were nearly equivalent. PACS numbers: 87.57.nj, 87.57.cp |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57204012018-04-02 Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software Pallotta, Stefania Ceroti, Marco Bucciolini, Marta J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes In radiotherapy, treatment portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are used to monitor patient setup during clinical routine. The output of the registration between the portal image and the reference DRR indicates the patient displacement. If the registration is not reliable, the patient positioning will not be accurate. The aim of this work is to assess the intrinsic and the global accuracy of iView and PIPSpro, two widely used registration software programs that implement a manual and a semiautomatic approach, respectively. The intrinsic accuracy was tested using a computer generated phantom, while the overall accuracy was evaluated registering the portal images and the DRRs of an Alderson RANDO phantom. For DRRs, four treatment planning systems (TPS) and three CT studies with different slice thicknesses were considered. This study demonstrates that the intrinsic accuracy of iView and PIPSpro were within 1 pixel and 1°. Using a DRR extracted from a 2 mm CT study, the overall accuracy of both methods was about 2 mm and 1°. When thicker CT slices are considered, the global accuracy of both methods worsens, and differences larger than 1.5° between the rotation parameters estimated with iView and PIPSpro are evident. The results obtained with iView and PIPSpro were nearly equivalent. PACS numbers: 87.57.nj, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5720401/ /pubmed/21081875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Pallotta, Stefania Ceroti, Marco Bucciolini, Marta Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title | Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title_full | Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title_short | Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software |
title_sort | accuracy of iview and pipspro registration software |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pallottastefania accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware AT cerotimarco accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware AT bucciolinimarta accuracyofiviewandpipsproregistrationsoftware |