Cargando…

Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning

The purpose was to identify an optimal set of treatment planning parameters and a minimal necessary dose matrix resolution for treatment planning with spot‐scanned protons. Treatment plans based on different combinations of planning parameters and dose grid resolutions (DG) were calculated in a homo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hillbrand, Martin, Georg, Dietmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3219
_version_ 1783284642695086080
author Hillbrand, Martin
Georg, Dietmar
author_facet Hillbrand, Martin
Georg, Dietmar
author_sort Hillbrand, Martin
collection PubMed
description The purpose was to identify an optimal set of treatment planning parameters and a minimal necessary dose matrix resolution for treatment planning with spot‐scanned protons. Treatment plans based on different combinations of planning parameters and dose grid resolutions (DG) were calculated in a homogeneous geometric phantom for three cubic targets of different size: 8, 64 and [Formula: see text]. The proton dose was delivered by one single beam. Treatment plans were compared in terms of dose profiles parallel to and perpendicular to the central beam axis, as well as by dose homogeneity and conformity measures. Irrespective of target size, the dose homogeneity and conformity were comparable if the distance between spot layers was in the order of the width of a single Bragg peak, and the lateral distance between spots did not exceed two times the spot sigma. If the distance between spot layers was considerably larger than the width of the Bragg peak, the homogeneity index increased. For the small target, this index escalated from values around 5% to 12% in extreme, and to more than 20% for the two larger targets. Furthermore, the width of the 95% isodose increased. Similar results were found for the variation of the parameter determining the lateral spacing between proton dose spots. The average difference of dose profiles with respect to the profile for a DG of 1 mm was below 3% for all considered settings up to a DG of 6 mm. However, a DG of less than 2–3 mm is required to keep the maximum deviation below this limit. The tests performed in this study are necessary to prevent systematic errors from spot‐scanning proton therapy planning. A separation of dose spots in the dimensions of the Bragg peak in the longitudinal direction and no more than two times the spot sigma in the lateral direction were found to be adequate for IMPT treatment planning in a homogeneous phantom. A DG of 2–3 mm is necessary to accurately resolve the steep dose gradients of proton beams. PACS number: 87.55.D‐; 7.55.de
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204092018-04-02 Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning Hillbrand, Martin Georg, Dietmar J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose was to identify an optimal set of treatment planning parameters and a minimal necessary dose matrix resolution for treatment planning with spot‐scanned protons. Treatment plans based on different combinations of planning parameters and dose grid resolutions (DG) were calculated in a homogeneous geometric phantom for three cubic targets of different size: 8, 64 and [Formula: see text]. The proton dose was delivered by one single beam. Treatment plans were compared in terms of dose profiles parallel to and perpendicular to the central beam axis, as well as by dose homogeneity and conformity measures. Irrespective of target size, the dose homogeneity and conformity were comparable if the distance between spot layers was in the order of the width of a single Bragg peak, and the lateral distance between spots did not exceed two times the spot sigma. If the distance between spot layers was considerably larger than the width of the Bragg peak, the homogeneity index increased. For the small target, this index escalated from values around 5% to 12% in extreme, and to more than 20% for the two larger targets. Furthermore, the width of the 95% isodose increased. Similar results were found for the variation of the parameter determining the lateral spacing between proton dose spots. The average difference of dose profiles with respect to the profile for a DG of 1 mm was below 3% for all considered settings up to a DG of 6 mm. However, a DG of less than 2–3 mm is required to keep the maximum deviation below this limit. The tests performed in this study are necessary to prevent systematic errors from spot‐scanning proton therapy planning. A separation of dose spots in the dimensions of the Bragg peak in the longitudinal direction and no more than two times the spot sigma in the lateral direction were found to be adequate for IMPT treatment planning in a homogeneous phantom. A DG of 2–3 mm is necessary to accurately resolve the steep dose gradients of proton beams. PACS number: 87.55.D‐; 7.55.de John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5720409/ /pubmed/21081877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3219 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hillbrand, Martin
Georg, Dietmar
Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title_full Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title_fullStr Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title_short Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
title_sort assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3219
work_keys_str_mv AT hillbrandmartin assessingasetofoptimaluserinterfaceparametersforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanning
AT georgdietmar assessingasetofoptimaluserinterfaceparametersforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyplanning