A quality assurance procedure to evaluate cone‐beam CT image center congruence with the radiation isocenter of a linear accelerator

A quality assurance (QA) procedure was developed to evaluate the congruence between the cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) image center and the radiation isocenter on a Varian Trilogy linac. In contrast to the published QA procedures, this method did not require a ball bearing (BB) phantom to be placed exactly at the radiation isocenter through precalibrated room lasers or light field crosshairs. The only requirement was that the BB phantom be in a stationary position near the radiation isocenter during the image acquisition process. The radiation isocenter was determined with respect to the center of the BB using a Winston‐Lutz test. The CBCT image center was found to have excellent short‐term positional reproducibility (i.e., less than 0.1 mm of wobble in each of the x (lateral), y (vertical), and z (longitudinal) directions) in 10 consecutive acquisitions. Measured over a seven‐month period, the CBCT image center deviated from the radiation isocenter by [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]. The z displacement of the 3D CBCT image center was highly correlated [Formula: see text] with that of the 2D kV portal image center. The correlation coefficients in the x and y directions were poor ([Formula: see text] and ‐0.35, respectively). Systematic discrepancies were found between the CBCT image center and the 2D MV, kV portal image centers. For the linear accelerator studied, we detected a 0.8 mm discrepancy between the CBCT image center and the MV EPID image center in the anterior‐posterior direction. This discrepancy was demonstrated in a clinical case study where the patient was positioned with CBCT followed by MV portal verification. The results from the new QA procedure are useful for guiding high‐precision patient positioning in stereotactic body radiation therapy. PACS number: 87.55.Qr