Cargando…

Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry

Relative absorbed‐dose energy response correction R for different detector materials in water, PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are calculated using Monte Carlo‐based EGSnrc code system for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy sources. The values of R obtained for [Formula: see tex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selvam, T. Palani, Keshavkumar, Biju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3282
Descripción
Sumario:Relative absorbed‐dose energy response correction R for different detector materials in water, PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are calculated using Monte Carlo‐based EGSnrc code system for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy sources. The values of R obtained for [Formula: see text] source are 1.41, 0.92, 3.97, 0.47, 8.32 and 1.10, respectively, for detector materials LiF, [Formula: see text] , diamond, silicon diode and air. These values are insensitive to source‐to‐detector distance and phantom material. For [Formula: see text] source, R is sensitive to source‐to‐detector distance for detector materials other than air and [Formula: see text]. For silicon, R increases from 3 to 4.23 when depth in water is increased from 0.5 cm to 15 cm. For [Formula: see text] source, the values of R obtained for air and [Formula: see text] in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are comparable to that obtained in water. However, LiF, Si and [Formula: see text] show enhanced response and diamond shows decreased response in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms than in water. PACS number: 87.53.Jw