Cargando…

Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry

Relative absorbed‐dose energy response correction R for different detector materials in water, PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are calculated using Monte Carlo‐based EGSnrc code system for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy sources. The values of R obtained for [Formula: see tex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selvam, T. Palani, Keshavkumar, Biju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3282
_version_ 1783284645781045248
author Selvam, T. Palani
Keshavkumar, Biju
author_facet Selvam, T. Palani
Keshavkumar, Biju
author_sort Selvam, T. Palani
collection PubMed
description Relative absorbed‐dose energy response correction R for different detector materials in water, PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are calculated using Monte Carlo‐based EGSnrc code system for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy sources. The values of R obtained for [Formula: see text] source are 1.41, 0.92, 3.97, 0.47, 8.32 and 1.10, respectively, for detector materials LiF, [Formula: see text] , diamond, silicon diode and air. These values are insensitive to source‐to‐detector distance and phantom material. For [Formula: see text] source, R is sensitive to source‐to‐detector distance for detector materials other than air and [Formula: see text]. For silicon, R increases from 3 to 4.23 when depth in water is increased from 0.5 cm to 15 cm. For [Formula: see text] source, the values of R obtained for air and [Formula: see text] in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are comparable to that obtained in water. However, LiF, Si and [Formula: see text] show enhanced response and diamond shows decreased response in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms than in water. PACS number: 87.53.Jw
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204232018-04-02 Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry Selvam, T. Palani Keshavkumar, Biju J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Relative absorbed‐dose energy response correction R for different detector materials in water, PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are calculated using Monte Carlo‐based EGSnrc code system for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy sources. The values of R obtained for [Formula: see text] source are 1.41, 0.92, 3.97, 0.47, 8.32 and 1.10, respectively, for detector materials LiF, [Formula: see text] , diamond, silicon diode and air. These values are insensitive to source‐to‐detector distance and phantom material. For [Formula: see text] source, R is sensitive to source‐to‐detector distance for detector materials other than air and [Formula: see text]. For silicon, R increases from 3 to 4.23 when depth in water is increased from 0.5 cm to 15 cm. For [Formula: see text] source, the values of R obtained for air and [Formula: see text] in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms are comparable to that obtained in water. However, LiF, Si and [Formula: see text] show enhanced response and diamond shows decreased response in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms than in water. PACS number: 87.53.Jw John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5720423/ /pubmed/21081887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3282 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Selvam, T. Palani
Keshavkumar, Biju
Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title_full Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title_fullStr Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title_short Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
title_sort monte carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in [formula: see text] and [formula: see text] brachytherapy dosimetry
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3282
work_keys_str_mv AT selvamtpalani montecarloinvestigationofenergyresponseofvariousdetectormaterialsinformulaseetextandformulaseetextbrachytherapydosimetry
AT keshavkumarbiju montecarloinvestigationofenergyresponseofvariousdetectormaterialsinformulaseetextandformulaseetextbrachytherapydosimetry