Cargando…

Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT

Dose distributions in HN‐IMRT are complex and may be sensitive to the treatment uncertainties. The goals of this study were to evaluate: 1) dose differences between plan and actual delivery and implications on margin requirement for HN‐IMRT with rigid setup errors; 2) dose distribution complexity on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Worthy, Danielle, Wu, Qiuwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3187
_version_ 1783284647510147072
author Worthy, Danielle
Wu, Qiuwen
author_facet Worthy, Danielle
Wu, Qiuwen
author_sort Worthy, Danielle
collection PubMed
description Dose distributions in HN‐IMRT are complex and may be sensitive to the treatment uncertainties. The goals of this study were to evaluate: 1) dose differences between plan and actual delivery and implications on margin requirement for HN‐IMRT with rigid setup errors; 2) dose distribution complexity on setup error sensitivity; and 3) agreement between average dose and cumulative dose in fractionated radiotherapy. Rigid setup errors for HN‐IMRT patients were measured using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) for 30 patients and 896 fractions. These were applied to plans for 12 HN patients who underwent simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT treatment. Dose distributions were recalculated at each fraction and summed into cumulative dose. Measured setup errors were scaled by factors of 2–4 to investigate margin adequacy. Two plans, direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) and fluence only (FO), were available for each patient to represent plans of different complexity. Normalized dosimetric indices, conformity index (CI) and conformation number (CN) were used in the evaluation. It was found that current 5 mm margins are more than adequate to compensate for rigid setup errors, and that standard margin recipes overestimate margins for rigid setup error in SIB HN‐IMRT because of differences in acceptance criteria used in margin evaluation. The CTV‐to‐PTV margins can be effectively reduced to 1.9 mm and 1.5 mm for CTV1 and CTV2. Plans of higher complexity and sharper dose gradients are more sensitive to setup error and require larger margins. The CI and CN are not recommended for cumulative dose evaluation because of inconsistent definition of target volumes used. For fractionated radiotherapy in HN‐IMRT, the average fractional dose does not represent the true cumulative dose received by the patient through voxel‐by‐voxel summation, primarily due to the setup error characteristics, where the random component is larger than systematic and different target regions get underdosed at each fraction. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Tf.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204302018-04-02 Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT Worthy, Danielle Wu, Qiuwen J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Dose distributions in HN‐IMRT are complex and may be sensitive to the treatment uncertainties. The goals of this study were to evaluate: 1) dose differences between plan and actual delivery and implications on margin requirement for HN‐IMRT with rigid setup errors; 2) dose distribution complexity on setup error sensitivity; and 3) agreement between average dose and cumulative dose in fractionated radiotherapy. Rigid setup errors for HN‐IMRT patients were measured using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) for 30 patients and 896 fractions. These were applied to plans for 12 HN patients who underwent simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT treatment. Dose distributions were recalculated at each fraction and summed into cumulative dose. Measured setup errors were scaled by factors of 2–4 to investigate margin adequacy. Two plans, direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) and fluence only (FO), were available for each patient to represent plans of different complexity. Normalized dosimetric indices, conformity index (CI) and conformation number (CN) were used in the evaluation. It was found that current 5 mm margins are more than adequate to compensate for rigid setup errors, and that standard margin recipes overestimate margins for rigid setup error in SIB HN‐IMRT because of differences in acceptance criteria used in margin evaluation. The CTV‐to‐PTV margins can be effectively reduced to 1.9 mm and 1.5 mm for CTV1 and CTV2. Plans of higher complexity and sharper dose gradients are more sensitive to setup error and require larger margins. The CI and CN are not recommended for cumulative dose evaluation because of inconsistent definition of target volumes used. For fractionated radiotherapy in HN‐IMRT, the average fractional dose does not represent the true cumulative dose received by the patient through voxel‐by‐voxel summation, primarily due to the setup error characteristics, where the random component is larger than systematic and different target regions get underdosed at each fraction. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Tf. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5720430/ /pubmed/20717085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3187 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Worthy, Danielle
Wu, Qiuwen
Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title_full Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title_fullStr Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title_short Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN‐IMRT
title_sort dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by cbct for hn‐imrt
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3187
work_keys_str_mv AT worthydanielle dosimetricassessmentofrigidsetuperrorbycbctforhnimrt
AT wuqiuwen dosimetricassessmentofrigidsetuperrorbycbctforhnimrt