Cargando…

Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths

The purpose is to demonstrate the ability to generate clinically acceptable prostate permanent seed implant plans using two seed types which are identical except for their activity. The IPSA inverse planning algorithms were modified to include multiple dose matrices for the calculation of dose from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunha, J. Adam M., Pickett, Barby, Pouliot, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3096
_version_ 1783284648210595840
author Cunha, J. Adam M.
Pickett, Barby
Pouliot, Jean
author_facet Cunha, J. Adam M.
Pickett, Barby
Pouliot, Jean
author_sort Cunha, J. Adam M.
collection PubMed
description The purpose is to demonstrate the ability to generate clinically acceptable prostate permanent seed implant plans using two seed types which are identical except for their activity. The IPSA inverse planning algorithms were modified to include multiple dose matrices for the calculation of dose from different sources, and a selection algorithm was implemented to allow for the swapping of source type at any given source position. Five previously treated patients with a range of prostate volumes from [Formula: see text] were re‐optimized under two hybrid scenarios: (1) using 0.32 and [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] , and (2) using 0.64 and [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]. Isodose lines were generated and dosimetric indices, [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] were calculated. The algorithm allows for the generation of single‐isotope, multi‐activity hybrid brachytherapy plans. By dealing with only one radionuclide, but of different activity, the biology is unchanged from a standard plan. All [Formula: see text] were within 2.3 percentage points for every plan and always above the clinically desirable 95%. All [Formula: see text] were identically zero, and [Formula: see text] is always below the clinically acceptable value of [Formula: see text]. Clinical optimization times for the hybrid plans are still under one minute, for most cases. It is possible to generate clinically advantageous brachytherapy plans (i.e. obtain the same quality dose distribution as a standard single‐activity plan) while incorporating leftover seeds from a previous patient treatment. This method will allow a clinic to continue to provide excellent patient care, but at a reduced cost. Multi‐activity hybrid plans were equal in quality (as measured by the standard dosimetric indices) to plans with seeds of a single activity. Despite the expanded search space, optimization times for these studies were still under two minutes on a modern day laptop and can be reduced to below one minute in a clinical setting. With the typical cost of a set of PPI seeds on the order of thousands of dollars, it is possible to reduce the cost of brachytherapy treatments by allowing for easier use of seeds left over from a previous patient or unused due to a cancelled treatment. PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.Kd, 87.55.ne
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204342018-04-02 Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths Cunha, J. Adam M. Pickett, Barby Pouliot, Jean J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose is to demonstrate the ability to generate clinically acceptable prostate permanent seed implant plans using two seed types which are identical except for their activity. The IPSA inverse planning algorithms were modified to include multiple dose matrices for the calculation of dose from different sources, and a selection algorithm was implemented to allow for the swapping of source type at any given source position. Five previously treated patients with a range of prostate volumes from [Formula: see text] were re‐optimized under two hybrid scenarios: (1) using 0.32 and [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] , and (2) using 0.64 and [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]. Isodose lines were generated and dosimetric indices, [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] were calculated. The algorithm allows for the generation of single‐isotope, multi‐activity hybrid brachytherapy plans. By dealing with only one radionuclide, but of different activity, the biology is unchanged from a standard plan. All [Formula: see text] were within 2.3 percentage points for every plan and always above the clinically desirable 95%. All [Formula: see text] were identically zero, and [Formula: see text] is always below the clinically acceptable value of [Formula: see text]. Clinical optimization times for the hybrid plans are still under one minute, for most cases. It is possible to generate clinically advantageous brachytherapy plans (i.e. obtain the same quality dose distribution as a standard single‐activity plan) while incorporating leftover seeds from a previous patient treatment. This method will allow a clinic to continue to provide excellent patient care, but at a reduced cost. Multi‐activity hybrid plans were equal in quality (as measured by the standard dosimetric indices) to plans with seeds of a single activity. Despite the expanded search space, optimization times for these studies were still under two minutes on a modern day laptop and can be reduced to below one minute in a clinical setting. With the typical cost of a set of PPI seeds on the order of thousands of dollars, it is possible to reduce the cost of brachytherapy treatments by allowing for easier use of seeds left over from a previous patient or unused due to a cancelled treatment. PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.Kd, 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5720434/ /pubmed/20717078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3096 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cunha, J. Adam M.
Pickett, Barby
Pouliot, Jean
Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title_full Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title_fullStr Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title_full_unstemmed Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title_short Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
title_sort inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent‐seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3096
work_keys_str_mv AT cunhajadamm inverseplanningoptimizationforhybridprostatepermanentseedimplantbrachytherapyplansusingtwosourcestrengths
AT pickettbarby inverseplanningoptimizationforhybridprostatepermanentseedimplantbrachytherapyplansusingtwosourcestrengths
AT pouliotjean inverseplanningoptimizationforhybridprostatepermanentseedimplantbrachytherapyplansusingtwosourcestrengths