Cargando…
Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213 |
_version_ | 1783284648704475136 |
---|---|
author | Hussain, Amjad Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo Brown, Derek Dunscombe, Peter |
author_facet | Hussain, Amjad Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo Brown, Derek Dunscombe, Peter |
author_sort | Hussain, Amjad |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluated the ability of the Eclipse AAA to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD. For this purpose, we use the Eclipse AAA algorithm, commissioned with machine‐specific beam data for a 6 MV photon beam, at standard SSD (100 cm). The model was then used for dose distribution calculations at extended SSD (179.5 cm). Two sets of measurements were acquired for a 6 MV beam (from a Varian linear accelerator) in a water tank at extended SSD: i) open beam for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes (defined at 179.5 cm SSD), and ii) identical field sizes but with a 1.3 cm thick acrylic spoiler placed 10 cm above the water surface. Dose profiles were acquired at 5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm depths. Dose distributions for the two setups were calculated using the AAA algorithm in Eclipse. Confidence limits for comparisons between measured and calculated absolute depth dose curves and normalized dose profiles were determined as suggested by Venselaar et al. The confidence limits were within 2% and 2 mm for both setups. Extended SSD calculations were also performed using Eclipse AAA, commissioned with Varian Golden beam data at standard SSD. No significant difference between the custom commissioned and Golden Eclipse AAA was observed. In conclusion, Eclipse AAA commissioned at standard SSD can be used to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD for 6 MV open beams. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.56.ng |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57204362018-04-02 Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD Hussain, Amjad Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo Brown, Derek Dunscombe, Peter J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluated the ability of the Eclipse AAA to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD. For this purpose, we use the Eclipse AAA algorithm, commissioned with machine‐specific beam data for a 6 MV photon beam, at standard SSD (100 cm). The model was then used for dose distribution calculations at extended SSD (179.5 cm). Two sets of measurements were acquired for a 6 MV beam (from a Varian linear accelerator) in a water tank at extended SSD: i) open beam for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes (defined at 179.5 cm SSD), and ii) identical field sizes but with a 1.3 cm thick acrylic spoiler placed 10 cm above the water surface. Dose profiles were acquired at 5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm depths. Dose distributions for the two setups were calculated using the AAA algorithm in Eclipse. Confidence limits for comparisons between measured and calculated absolute depth dose curves and normalized dose profiles were determined as suggested by Venselaar et al. The confidence limits were within 2% and 2 mm for both setups. Extended SSD calculations were also performed using Eclipse AAA, commissioned with Varian Golden beam data at standard SSD. No significant difference between the custom commissioned and Golden Eclipse AAA was observed. In conclusion, Eclipse AAA commissioned at standard SSD can be used to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD for 6 MV open beams. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.56.ng John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5720436/ /pubmed/20717088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Hussain, Amjad Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo Brown, Derek Dunscombe, Peter Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title | Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title_full | Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title_short | Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD |
title_sort | validation of the eclipse aaa algorithm at extended ssd |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussainamjad validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd AT villarrealbarajaseduardo validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd AT brownderek validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd AT dunscombepeter validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd |