Cargando…

Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD

The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussain, Amjad, Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo, Brown, Derek, Dunscombe, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213
_version_ 1783284648704475136
author Hussain, Amjad
Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo
Brown, Derek
Dunscombe, Peter
author_facet Hussain, Amjad
Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo
Brown, Derek
Dunscombe, Peter
author_sort Hussain, Amjad
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluated the ability of the Eclipse AAA to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD. For this purpose, we use the Eclipse AAA algorithm, commissioned with machine‐specific beam data for a 6 MV photon beam, at standard SSD (100 cm). The model was then used for dose distribution calculations at extended SSD (179.5 cm). Two sets of measurements were acquired for a 6 MV beam (from a Varian linear accelerator) in a water tank at extended SSD: i) open beam for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes (defined at 179.5 cm SSD), and ii) identical field sizes but with a 1.3 cm thick acrylic spoiler placed 10 cm above the water surface. Dose profiles were acquired at 5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm depths. Dose distributions for the two setups were calculated using the AAA algorithm in Eclipse. Confidence limits for comparisons between measured and calculated absolute depth dose curves and normalized dose profiles were determined as suggested by Venselaar et al. The confidence limits were within 2% and 2 mm for both setups. Extended SSD calculations were also performed using Eclipse AAA, commissioned with Varian Golden beam data at standard SSD. No significant difference between the custom commissioned and Golden Eclipse AAA was observed. In conclusion, Eclipse AAA commissioned at standard SSD can be used to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD for 6 MV open beams. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.56.ng
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204362018-04-02 Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD Hussain, Amjad Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo Brown, Derek Dunscombe, Peter J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The accuracy of dose calculations at extended SSD is of significant importance in the dosimetric planning of total body irradiation (TBI). In a first step toward the implementation of electronic, multi‐leaf collimator compensation for dose inhomogeneities and surface contour in TBI, we have evaluated the ability of the Eclipse AAA to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD. For this purpose, we use the Eclipse AAA algorithm, commissioned with machine‐specific beam data for a 6 MV photon beam, at standard SSD (100 cm). The model was then used for dose distribution calculations at extended SSD (179.5 cm). Two sets of measurements were acquired for a 6 MV beam (from a Varian linear accelerator) in a water tank at extended SSD: i) open beam for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes (defined at 179.5 cm SSD), and ii) identical field sizes but with a 1.3 cm thick acrylic spoiler placed 10 cm above the water surface. Dose profiles were acquired at 5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm depths. Dose distributions for the two setups were calculated using the AAA algorithm in Eclipse. Confidence limits for comparisons between measured and calculated absolute depth dose curves and normalized dose profiles were determined as suggested by Venselaar et al. The confidence limits were within 2% and 2 mm for both setups. Extended SSD calculations were also performed using Eclipse AAA, commissioned with Varian Golden beam data at standard SSD. No significant difference between the custom commissioned and Golden Eclipse AAA was observed. In conclusion, Eclipse AAA commissioned at standard SSD can be used to accurately predict dose distributions in water at extended SSD for 6 MV open beams. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.56.ng John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5720436/ /pubmed/20717088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hussain, Amjad
Villarreal‐Barajas, Eduardo
Brown, Derek
Dunscombe, Peter
Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title_full Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title_fullStr Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title_short Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD
title_sort validation of the eclipse aaa algorithm at extended ssd
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3213
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainamjad validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd
AT villarrealbarajaseduardo validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd
AT brownderek validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd
AT dunscombepeter validationoftheeclipseaaaalgorithmatextendedssd