Cargando…
Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192 |
_version_ | 1783284651357372416 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Imad Tubbs, Jesse Hibbitts, Kerry Algan, Ozer Thompson, Spencer Herman, Terence Ahmad, Salahuddin |
author_facet | Ali, Imad Tubbs, Jesse Hibbitts, Kerry Algan, Ozer Thompson, Spencer Herman, Terence Ahmad, Salahuddin |
author_sort | Ali, Imad |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and [Formula: see text] represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions. PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57204472018-04-02 Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging Ali, Imad Tubbs, Jesse Hibbitts, Kerry Algan, Ozer Thompson, Spencer Herman, Terence Ahmad, Salahuddin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and [Formula: see text] represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions. PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5720447/ /pubmed/20717086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Ali, Imad Tubbs, Jesse Hibbitts, Kerry Algan, Ozer Thompson, Spencer Herman, Terence Ahmad, Salahuddin Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging |
title | Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
|
title_full | Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
|
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
|
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
|
title_short | Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
|
title_sort | evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kv on‐board imaging |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aliimad evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT tubbsjesse evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT hibbittskerry evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT alganozer evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT thompsonspencer evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT hermanterence evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging AT ahmadsalahuddin evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging |