Cargando…

Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging

The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Imad, Tubbs, Jesse, Hibbitts, Kerry, Algan, Ozer, Thompson, Spencer, Herman, Terence, Ahmad, Salahuddin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192
_version_ 1783284651357372416
author Ali, Imad
Tubbs, Jesse
Hibbitts, Kerry
Algan, Ozer
Thompson, Spencer
Herman, Terence
Ahmad, Salahuddin
author_facet Ali, Imad
Tubbs, Jesse
Hibbitts, Kerry
Algan, Ozer
Thompson, Spencer
Herman, Terence
Ahmad, Salahuddin
author_sort Ali, Imad
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and [Formula: see text] represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions. PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204472018-04-02 Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging Ali, Imad Tubbs, Jesse Hibbitts, Kerry Algan, Ozer Thompson, Spencer Herman, Terence Ahmad, Salahuddin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and [Formula: see text] represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions. PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5720447/ /pubmed/20717086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ali, Imad
Tubbs, Jesse
Hibbitts, Kerry
Algan, Ozer
Thompson, Spencer
Herman, Terence
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title_full Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title_fullStr Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title_short Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
title_sort evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kv on‐board imaging
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3192
work_keys_str_mv AT aliimad evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT tubbsjesse evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT hibbittskerry evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT alganozer evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT thompsonspencer evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT hermanterence evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging
AT ahmadsalahuddin evaluationofthesetupaccuracyofastereotacticradiotherapyheadimmobilizationmasksystemusingkvonboardimaging