Cargando…

Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy

The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreibmann, Eduard, Elder, Eric, Fox, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919
_version_ 1783284660249296896
author Schreibmann, Eduard
Elder, Eric
Fox, Tim
author_facet Schreibmann, Eduard
Elder, Eric
Fox, Tim
author_sort Schreibmann, Eduard
collection PubMed
description The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually observing deviations of certain features in acquired kV in‐room treatment images such as markers, distances, or HU values from phantom specifications. This is a time‐consuming and subjective task because these features are identified by human operators. The method implemented in this study automated an IGRT QA protocol by using specific image processing algorithms that rigorously detected phantom features and performed all measurements involved in a classical QA protocol. The algorithm was tested on four different IGRT QA phantoms. Image analysis algorithms were able to detect QA features with the same accuracy as the manual approach but significantly faster. All described tests were performed in a single procedure, with acquisition of the images taking approximately 5 minutes, and the automated software analysis taking less than 1 minute. The study showed that the automated image analysis based procedure may be used as a daily QA procedure because it is completely automated and uses a single phantom setup. PACS numbers: 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57204962018-04-02 Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy Schreibmann, Eduard Elder, Eric Fox, Tim J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually observing deviations of certain features in acquired kV in‐room treatment images such as markers, distances, or HU values from phantom specifications. This is a time‐consuming and subjective task because these features are identified by human operators. The method implemented in this study automated an IGRT QA protocol by using specific image processing algorithms that rigorously detected phantom features and performed all measurements involved in a classical QA protocol. The algorithm was tested on four different IGRT QA phantoms. Image analysis algorithms were able to detect QA features with the same accuracy as the manual approach but significantly faster. All described tests were performed in a single procedure, with acquisition of the images taking approximately 5 minutes, and the automated software analysis taking less than 1 minute. The study showed that the automated image analysis based procedure may be used as a daily QA procedure because it is completely automated and uses a single phantom setup. PACS numbers: 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5720496/ /pubmed/19223842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Schreibmann, Eduard
Elder, Eric
Fox, Tim
Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title_full Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title_short Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
title_sort automated quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919
work_keys_str_mv AT schreibmanneduard automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy
AT eldereric automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy
AT foxtim automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy