Cargando…
Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy
The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919 |
_version_ | 1783284660249296896 |
---|---|
author | Schreibmann, Eduard Elder, Eric Fox, Tim |
author_facet | Schreibmann, Eduard Elder, Eric Fox, Tim |
author_sort | Schreibmann, Eduard |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually observing deviations of certain features in acquired kV in‐room treatment images such as markers, distances, or HU values from phantom specifications. This is a time‐consuming and subjective task because these features are identified by human operators. The method implemented in this study automated an IGRT QA protocol by using specific image processing algorithms that rigorously detected phantom features and performed all measurements involved in a classical QA protocol. The algorithm was tested on four different IGRT QA phantoms. Image analysis algorithms were able to detect QA features with the same accuracy as the manual approach but significantly faster. All described tests were performed in a single procedure, with acquisition of the images taking approximately 5 minutes, and the automated software analysis taking less than 1 minute. The study showed that the automated image analysis based procedure may be used as a daily QA procedure because it is completely automated and uses a single phantom setup. PACS numbers: 87.56.Fc |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57204962018-04-02 Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy Schreibmann, Eduard Elder, Eric Fox, Tim J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The use of image‐guided patient positioning requires fast and reliable Quality Assurance (QA) methods to ensure the megavoltage (MV) treatment beam coincides with the integrated kilovoltage (kV) or volumetric cone‐beam CT (CBCT) imaging and guidance systems. Current QA protocol is based on visually observing deviations of certain features in acquired kV in‐room treatment images such as markers, distances, or HU values from phantom specifications. This is a time‐consuming and subjective task because these features are identified by human operators. The method implemented in this study automated an IGRT QA protocol by using specific image processing algorithms that rigorously detected phantom features and performed all measurements involved in a classical QA protocol. The algorithm was tested on four different IGRT QA phantoms. Image analysis algorithms were able to detect QA features with the same accuracy as the manual approach but significantly faster. All described tests were performed in a single procedure, with acquisition of the images taking approximately 5 minutes, and the automated software analysis taking less than 1 minute. The study showed that the automated image analysis based procedure may be used as a daily QA procedure because it is completely automated and uses a single phantom setup. PACS numbers: 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5720496/ /pubmed/19223842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Schreibmann, Eduard Elder, Eric Fox, Tim Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title | Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title_full | Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr | Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title_short | Automated Quality Assurance for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy |
title_sort | automated quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreibmanneduard automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy AT eldereric automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy AT foxtim automatedqualityassuranceforimageguidedradiationtherapy |