Cargando…

Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit

A new calculation algorithm has been developed for independently verifying doses calculated by the TomoTherapy(®) Hi·Art(®) treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm is designed to confi rm the dose to a point in a high dose, low dose‐gradient region. Patient data used by the algorithm include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbons, John P., Smith, Koren, Cheek, Dennis, Rosen, Isaac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772
_version_ 1783284663183212544
author Gibbons, John P.
Smith, Koren
Cheek, Dennis
Rosen, Isaac
author_facet Gibbons, John P.
Smith, Koren
Cheek, Dennis
Rosen, Isaac
author_sort Gibbons, John P.
collection PubMed
description A new calculation algorithm has been developed for independently verifying doses calculated by the TomoTherapy(®) Hi·Art(®) treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm is designed to confi rm the dose to a point in a high dose, low dose‐gradient region. Patient data used by the algorithm include the radiological depth to the point for each projection angle and the treatment sinogram file controlling the leaf opening time for each projection. The algorithm uses common dosimetric functions [tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and output factor ([Formula: see text])] for the central axis combined with lateral and longitudinal beam profile data to quantify the off‐axis dose dependence. Machine data for the dosimetric functions were measured on the Hi·Art machine and simulated using the TPS. Point dose calculations were made for several test phantoms and for 97 patient treatment plans using the simulated machine data. Comparisons with TPS‐predicted point doses for the phantom treatment plans demonstrated agreement within 2% for both on‐axis and off‐axis planning target volumes (PTVs). Comparisons with TPS‐predicted point doses for the patient treatment plans also showed good agreement. For calculations at sites other than lung and superficial PTVs, agreement between the calculations was within 2% for 94% of the patient calculations (64 of 68). Calculations within lung and superficial PTVs overestimated the dose by an average of 3.1% ([Formula: see text]) and 3.2% ([Formula: see text]), respectively. Systematic errors within lung are probably due to the weakness of the algorithm in correcting for missing tissue and/or tissue density heterogeneities. Errors encountered within superficial PTVs probably result from the algorithm overestimating the scatter dose within the patient. Our results demonstrate that for the majority of cases, the algorithm could be used without further refinement to independently verify patient treatment plans. PACS number(s): 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Xd
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57205092018-04-02 Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit Gibbons, John P. Smith, Koren Cheek, Dennis Rosen, Isaac J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A new calculation algorithm has been developed for independently verifying doses calculated by the TomoTherapy(®) Hi·Art(®) treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm is designed to confi rm the dose to a point in a high dose, low dose‐gradient region. Patient data used by the algorithm include the radiological depth to the point for each projection angle and the treatment sinogram file controlling the leaf opening time for each projection. The algorithm uses common dosimetric functions [tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and output factor ([Formula: see text])] for the central axis combined with lateral and longitudinal beam profile data to quantify the off‐axis dose dependence. Machine data for the dosimetric functions were measured on the Hi·Art machine and simulated using the TPS. Point dose calculations were made for several test phantoms and for 97 patient treatment plans using the simulated machine data. Comparisons with TPS‐predicted point doses for the phantom treatment plans demonstrated agreement within 2% for both on‐axis and off‐axis planning target volumes (PTVs). Comparisons with TPS‐predicted point doses for the patient treatment plans also showed good agreement. For calculations at sites other than lung and superficial PTVs, agreement between the calculations was within 2% for 94% of the patient calculations (64 of 68). Calculations within lung and superficial PTVs overestimated the dose by an average of 3.1% ([Formula: see text]) and 3.2% ([Formula: see text]), respectively. Systematic errors within lung are probably due to the weakness of the algorithm in correcting for missing tissue and/or tissue density heterogeneities. Errors encountered within superficial PTVs probably result from the algorithm overestimating the scatter dose within the patient. Our results demonstrate that for the majority of cases, the algorithm could be used without further refinement to independently verify patient treatment plans. PACS number(s): 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Xd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5720509/ /pubmed/19223830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Gibbons, John P.
Smith, Koren
Cheek, Dennis
Rosen, Isaac
Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title_full Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title_fullStr Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title_full_unstemmed Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title_short Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit
title_sort independent calculation of dose from a helical tomotherapy unit
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbonsjohnp independentcalculationofdosefromahelicaltomotherapyunit
AT smithkoren independentcalculationofdosefromahelicaltomotherapyunit
AT cheekdennis independentcalculationofdosefromahelicaltomotherapyunit
AT rosenisaac independentcalculationofdosefromahelicaltomotherapyunit