Cargando…
Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station
The purpose of this work is to evaluate statistically the accuracy of a patient transfer station (PTS), which automatically converts one planning‐station‐generated treatment plan to another one with a different beam model. In our department we have installed two Hi•Art tomotherapy systems (TomoThera...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.3060 |
_version_ | 1783284673246396416 |
---|---|
author | Zhuang, Audrey H. Liu, An Schultheiss, Timothy E. Wong, Jeffrey Y.C. |
author_facet | Zhuang, Audrey H. Liu, An Schultheiss, Timothy E. Wong, Jeffrey Y.C. |
author_sort | Zhuang, Audrey H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this work is to evaluate statistically the accuracy of a patient transfer station (PTS), which automatically converts one planning‐station‐generated treatment plan to another one with a different beam model. In our department we have installed two Hi•Art tomotherapy systems (TomoTherapy Inc., Madison, WI), and patients often need to be transferred from one tomotherapy unit to the other. Thirty patients who underwent patient transfer between the two systems were evaluated. For each patient, dose differences between his/her original plan and PTS‐transferred plan were evaluated by comparing doses at 10 randomly selected positions in his/her CT images. The Pearson indexes were calculated to analyze the relationship of the deviations to other parameters, which include absolute dose levels, sites (targets or normal tissues), and the dose accuracy of original plans and that of transferred plans. The dose accuracy of a treatment plan was determined by comparing delivered doses at the center of a [Formula: see text] solid water phantom to planned doses at the same position. The calculated dose difference between original and transferred plans was, on average, [Formula: see text]; the maximum deviation in absolute values was 1.9% in target volumes and 2.5% in normal organs. The errors generated during PTS‐based transferring process were random and did not show correlation with other parameters. The PTS took less than 10 minutes to generate a backup plan, much less than the approximately two hours needed to create a duplicate plan manually. The results show that a PTS‐transferred plan is an acceptable match to the original plan. With a physician's approval, a transferred plan is acceptable for treatment without the necessity of being revalidated in phantom. Thus far, all of our PTS plans have been approved by the treating physician without further optimization. PACS number: 87.55.km, 87.55.D‐ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57205522018-04-02 Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station Zhuang, Audrey H. Liu, An Schultheiss, Timothy E. Wong, Jeffrey Y.C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to evaluate statistically the accuracy of a patient transfer station (PTS), which automatically converts one planning‐station‐generated treatment plan to another one with a different beam model. In our department we have installed two Hi•Art tomotherapy systems (TomoTherapy Inc., Madison, WI), and patients often need to be transferred from one tomotherapy unit to the other. Thirty patients who underwent patient transfer between the two systems were evaluated. For each patient, dose differences between his/her original plan and PTS‐transferred plan were evaluated by comparing doses at 10 randomly selected positions in his/her CT images. The Pearson indexes were calculated to analyze the relationship of the deviations to other parameters, which include absolute dose levels, sites (targets or normal tissues), and the dose accuracy of original plans and that of transferred plans. The dose accuracy of a treatment plan was determined by comparing delivered doses at the center of a [Formula: see text] solid water phantom to planned doses at the same position. The calculated dose difference between original and transferred plans was, on average, [Formula: see text]; the maximum deviation in absolute values was 1.9% in target volumes and 2.5% in normal organs. The errors generated during PTS‐based transferring process were random and did not show correlation with other parameters. The PTS took less than 10 minutes to generate a backup plan, much less than the approximately two hours needed to create a duplicate plan manually. The results show that a PTS‐transferred plan is an acceptable match to the original plan. With a physician's approval, a transferred plan is acceptable for treatment without the necessity of being revalidated in phantom. Thus far, all of our PTS plans have been approved by the treating physician without further optimization. PACS number: 87.55.km, 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5720552/ /pubmed/19692985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.3060 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Zhuang, Audrey H. Liu, An Schultheiss, Timothy E. Wong, Jeffrey Y.C. Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title | Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title_full | Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title_fullStr | Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title_short | Statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
title_sort | statistical validation of a new helical tomotherapy patient transfer station |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.3060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuangaudreyh statisticalvalidationofanewhelicaltomotherapypatienttransferstation AT liuan statisticalvalidationofanewhelicaltomotherapypatienttransferstation AT schultheisstimothye statisticalvalidationofanewhelicaltomotherapypatienttransferstation AT wongjeffreyyc statisticalvalidationofanewhelicaltomotherapypatienttransferstation |