Cargando…

Evaluation of the eclipse electron Monte Carlo dose calculation for small fields

Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA) has implemented the Monte Carlo electron dose calculation algorithm (eMC) in the Eclipse treatment planning system. Previous algorithms for electron treatment planning were limited in their calculation ability for small field depth doses and monitor units. An o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhigang, Walsh, Sarah E., Telivala, Tejas P., Meek, Allen G., Yang, Guozhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2834
Descripción
Sumario:Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA) has implemented the Monte Carlo electron dose calculation algorithm (eMC) in the Eclipse treatment planning system. Previous algorithms for electron treatment planning were limited in their calculation ability for small field depth doses and monitor units. An old rule of thumb to approximate the limiting cutout size for an electron field was determined by the lateral scatter equilibrium and approximated by E (MeV)/2.5 in centimeters of water. In this study, we compared eMC calculations and measurements of depth doses, isodose distributions, and monitor units for several different energy and small field cutout size combinations at different SSDs. Measurements were made using EBT film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ) and a PinPoint ion chamber (PTW‐New York Corp., Hicksville, NY). Our results indicate that the eMC algorithm can accurately predict depth doses, isodose distributions, and monitor units (within 2.5%) for field sizes as small as 3.0 cm diameter for energies in the 6 to 20 MeV range at 100 cm SSD. Therefore, the previous energy dependent rule of thumb does not apply to the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo code. However, at extended SSDs (105–110 cm), the results show good agreement (within 4%) only for higher energies (12, 16, and 20 MeV) for a field size of 3 cm. PACS number: 87.53.Hv