Cargando…

Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging

The purpose of this study was to characterize automatic remote couch adjustment and to assess the accuracy of automatic couch corrections following localization with cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Automatic couch movement was evaluated through passive reflector markers placed on a phantom, tracked with an opt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Winnie, Moseley, Douglas J., Manfredi, Tony, Jaffray, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3056
_version_ 1783284676933189632
author Li, Winnie
Moseley, Douglas J.
Manfredi, Tony
Jaffray, David A.
author_facet Li, Winnie
Moseley, Douglas J.
Manfredi, Tony
Jaffray, David A.
author_sort Li, Winnie
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to characterize automatic remote couch adjustment and to assess the accuracy of automatic couch corrections following localization with cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Automatic couch movement was evaluated through passive reflector markers placed on a phantom, tracked with an optical tracking system (OTS). Repeated couch movements in the lateral, cranial/caudal, and vertical directions were monitored through the OTS to assess velocity and response time. In conjunction with CBCT, remote table movement for patient displacements following initial setup was available on four linear accelerators (Elekta Synergy). After the initial CBCT scan assessment, patients with isocenter displacements that exceeded clinical protocol tolerances were corrected using remote automatic couch movement. A verification CBCT scan was acquired after any remote movements. These verification CBCT datasets were assessed for the following time periods: one month post clinical installation, and six months later to monitor remote couch correction stability. Residual error analysis was evaluated using the verification scans. The mean ± standard deviations [Formula: see text] of couch movement based on phantom measurements with the OTS were [Formula: see text] in the L/R, A/P, and S/I couch directions, respectively. The fastest maximum velocity was observed in the inferior direction at 10.5 mm/s, and the slowest maximum velocity in the left direction at 3.6 mm/s. From 1134 verification CBCT registrations for 207 patients, the residual error for each translational direction from each month evaluated are reported. The μ was less than 0.3 mm in all directions, and σ was in the order of 1 mm. At a 3 mm threshold, 21 of the 1134 fractions (2%) exceeded tolerance, attributed to patient intrafraction movement. Remote automatic couch movement is reliable and effective for adjusting patient position with a precision of approximately 1 mm. Patient residual error observed in this study demonstrates that displacement is minimal after remote couch adjustment. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.57.Q
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57205672018-04-02 Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging Li, Winnie Moseley, Douglas J. Manfredi, Tony Jaffray, David A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to characterize automatic remote couch adjustment and to assess the accuracy of automatic couch corrections following localization with cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Automatic couch movement was evaluated through passive reflector markers placed on a phantom, tracked with an optical tracking system (OTS). Repeated couch movements in the lateral, cranial/caudal, and vertical directions were monitored through the OTS to assess velocity and response time. In conjunction with CBCT, remote table movement for patient displacements following initial setup was available on four linear accelerators (Elekta Synergy). After the initial CBCT scan assessment, patients with isocenter displacements that exceeded clinical protocol tolerances were corrected using remote automatic couch movement. A verification CBCT scan was acquired after any remote movements. These verification CBCT datasets were assessed for the following time periods: one month post clinical installation, and six months later to monitor remote couch correction stability. Residual error analysis was evaluated using the verification scans. The mean ± standard deviations [Formula: see text] of couch movement based on phantom measurements with the OTS were [Formula: see text] in the L/R, A/P, and S/I couch directions, respectively. The fastest maximum velocity was observed in the inferior direction at 10.5 mm/s, and the slowest maximum velocity in the left direction at 3.6 mm/s. From 1134 verification CBCT registrations for 207 patients, the residual error for each translational direction from each month evaluated are reported. The μ was less than 0.3 mm in all directions, and σ was in the order of 1 mm. At a 3 mm threshold, 21 of the 1134 fractions (2%) exceeded tolerance, attributed to patient intrafraction movement. Remote automatic couch movement is reliable and effective for adjusting patient position with a precision of approximately 1 mm. Patient residual error observed in this study demonstrates that displacement is minimal after remote couch adjustment. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.57.Q John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720567/ /pubmed/19918232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3056 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Li, Winnie
Moseley, Douglas J.
Manfredi, Tony
Jaffray, David A.
Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title_full Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title_fullStr Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title_short Accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
title_sort accuracy of automatic couch corrections with on‐line volumetric imaging
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3056
work_keys_str_mv AT liwinnie accuracyofautomaticcouchcorrectionswithonlinevolumetricimaging
AT moseleydouglasj accuracyofautomaticcouchcorrectionswithonlinevolumetricimaging
AT manfreditony accuracyofautomaticcouchcorrectionswithonlinevolumetricimaging
AT jaffraydavida accuracyofautomaticcouchcorrectionswithonlinevolumetricimaging