Cargando…
Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and tomotherapy
The purpose of this study is to examine plan quality, treatment planning time, and estimated treatment delivery time for 5‐ and 9‐field sliding window IMRT, single and dual arc RapidArc, and tomotherapy. For four phantoms, 5‐ and 9‐field IMRT, single and dual arc RapidArc and tomotherapy plans were...
Autores principales: | Oliver, Mike, Ansbacher, Will, Beckham, Wayne A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3068 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Understanding the impact of RapidArc therapy delivery errors for prostate cancer
por: Oliver, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Lung SBRT: dosimetric and delivery comparison of RapidArc, TomoTherapy, and IMRT
por: Weyh, Ashleigh, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Analysis of RapidArc optimization strategies using objective function values and dose‐volume histograms
por: Oliver, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Monitor unit optimization in RapidArc plans for prostate cancer
por: Clemente, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Quality assurance methodology for Varian RapidArc treatment plans
por: Iftimia, Ileana, et al.
Publicado: (2010)