Cargando…

Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China

Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (199...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xiao Hong, Wang, Wei, Yin, Chun Mei, Hou, Hai Jun, Xie, Ke Jun, Xie, Xiao Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280
_version_ 1783284706094088192
author Wu, Xiao Hong
Wang, Wei
Yin, Chun Mei
Hou, Hai Jun
Xie, Ke Jun
Xie, Xiao Li
author_facet Wu, Xiao Hong
Wang, Wei
Yin, Chun Mei
Hou, Hai Jun
Xie, Ke Jun
Xie, Xiao Li
author_sort Wu, Xiao Hong
collection PubMed
description Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha(-1) in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha(-1) in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57206982017-12-15 Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China Wu, Xiao Hong Wang, Wei Yin, Chun Mei Hou, Hai Jun Xie, Ke Jun Xie, Xiao Li PLoS One Research Article Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha(-1) in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha(-1) in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720698/ /pubmed/29216292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280 Text en © 2017 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Xiao Hong
Wang, Wei
Yin, Chun Mei
Hou, Hai Jun
Xie, Ke Jun
Xie, Xiao Li
Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title_full Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title_fullStr Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title_full_unstemmed Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title_short Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
title_sort water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxiaohong waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina
AT wangwei waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina
AT yinchunmei waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina
AT houhaijun waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina
AT xiekejun waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina
AT xiexiaoli waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina