Cargando…
Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (199...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280 |
_version_ | 1783284706094088192 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Xiao Hong Wang, Wei Yin, Chun Mei Hou, Hai Jun Xie, Ke Jun Xie, Xiao Li |
author_facet | Wu, Xiao Hong Wang, Wei Yin, Chun Mei Hou, Hai Jun Xie, Ke Jun Xie, Xiao Li |
author_sort | Wu, Xiao Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha(-1) in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha(-1) in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57206982017-12-15 Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China Wu, Xiao Hong Wang, Wei Yin, Chun Mei Hou, Hai Jun Xie, Ke Jun Xie, Xiao Li PLoS One Research Article Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha(-1) in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha(-1) in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720698/ /pubmed/29216292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280 Text en © 2017 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Xiao Hong Wang, Wei Yin, Chun Mei Hou, Hai Jun Xie, Ke Jun Xie, Xiao Li Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title | Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title_full | Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title_fullStr | Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title_short | Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China |
title_sort | water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuxiaohong waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina AT wangwei waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina AT yinchunmei waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina AT houhaijun waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina AT xiekejun waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina AT xiexiaoli waterconsumptiongrainyieldandwaterproductivityinresponsetofieldwatermanagementindoublericesystemsinchina |