Cargando…

Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize

BACKGROUND: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require household survey programmes such as the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to enhance data collection to cover new indicators. This study aims to evaluated methods for assessing water quality, water availability, em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Shane M., Bain, Robert E. S., Lunze, Karsten, Unalan, Turgay, Beshanski-Pedersen, Bo, Slaymaker, Tom, Johnston, Richard, Hancioglu, Attila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189089
_version_ 1783284706332114944
author Khan, Shane M.
Bain, Robert E. S.
Lunze, Karsten
Unalan, Turgay
Beshanski-Pedersen, Bo
Slaymaker, Tom
Johnston, Richard
Hancioglu, Attila
author_facet Khan, Shane M.
Bain, Robert E. S.
Lunze, Karsten
Unalan, Turgay
Beshanski-Pedersen, Bo
Slaymaker, Tom
Johnston, Richard
Hancioglu, Attila
author_sort Khan, Shane M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require household survey programmes such as the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to enhance data collection to cover new indicators. This study aims to evaluated methods for assessing water quality, water availability, emptying of sanitation facilities, menstrual hygiene management and the acceptability of water quality testing in households which are key to monitoring SDG targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and emerging issues. METHODS: As part of a MICS field test, we interviewed 429 households and 267 women age 15–49 in Stann Creek, Belize in a split-sample experiment. In a concurrent qualitative component, we conducted focus groups with interviewers and cognitive interviews with respondents during and immediately following questionnaire administration in the field to explore their question comprehension and response processes. FINDINGS: About 88% of respondents agreed to water quality testing but also desired test results, given the potential implications for their own health. Escherichia coli was present in 36% of drinking water collected at the source, and in 47% of samples consumed in the household. Both questions on water availability necessitated probing by interviewers. About one quarter of households reported emptying of pit latrines and septic tanks, though one-quarter could not provide an answer to the question. Asking questions on menstrual hygiene was acceptable to respondents, but required some clarification and probing. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Belize, this study confirmed the feasibility of collecting information on the availability and quality of drinking water, emptying of sanitation facilities and menstrual hygiene in a multi-purpose household survey, indicating specific areas to improve question formulation and field protocols. Improvements have been incorporated into the latest round of MICS surveys which will be a major source of national data for monitoring of SDG targets for drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and emerging issues for WASH sector programming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57206992017-12-15 Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize Khan, Shane M. Bain, Robert E. S. Lunze, Karsten Unalan, Turgay Beshanski-Pedersen, Bo Slaymaker, Tom Johnston, Richard Hancioglu, Attila PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require household survey programmes such as the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to enhance data collection to cover new indicators. This study aims to evaluated methods for assessing water quality, water availability, emptying of sanitation facilities, menstrual hygiene management and the acceptability of water quality testing in households which are key to monitoring SDG targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and emerging issues. METHODS: As part of a MICS field test, we interviewed 429 households and 267 women age 15–49 in Stann Creek, Belize in a split-sample experiment. In a concurrent qualitative component, we conducted focus groups with interviewers and cognitive interviews with respondents during and immediately following questionnaire administration in the field to explore their question comprehension and response processes. FINDINGS: About 88% of respondents agreed to water quality testing but also desired test results, given the potential implications for their own health. Escherichia coli was present in 36% of drinking water collected at the source, and in 47% of samples consumed in the household. Both questions on water availability necessitated probing by interviewers. About one quarter of households reported emptying of pit latrines and septic tanks, though one-quarter could not provide an answer to the question. Asking questions on menstrual hygiene was acceptable to respondents, but required some clarification and probing. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Belize, this study confirmed the feasibility of collecting information on the availability and quality of drinking water, emptying of sanitation facilities and menstrual hygiene in a multi-purpose household survey, indicating specific areas to improve question formulation and field protocols. Improvements have been incorporated into the latest round of MICS surveys which will be a major source of national data for monitoring of SDG targets for drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and emerging issues for WASH sector programming. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720699/ /pubmed/29216244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189089 Text en © 2017 Khan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khan, Shane M.
Bain, Robert E. S.
Lunze, Karsten
Unalan, Turgay
Beshanski-Pedersen, Bo
Slaymaker, Tom
Johnston, Richard
Hancioglu, Attila
Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title_full Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title_fullStr Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title_short Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: A mixed-methods field-test in Belize
title_sort optimizing household survey methods to monitor the sustainable development goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: a mixed-methods field-test in belize
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189089
work_keys_str_mv AT khanshanem optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT bainrobertes optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT lunzekarsten optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT unalanturgay optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT beshanskipedersenbo optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT slaymakertom optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT johnstonrichard optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize
AT hanciogluattila optimizinghouseholdsurveymethodstomonitorthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstargets61and62ondrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneamixedmethodsfieldtestinbelize