Cargando…

Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment

BACKGROUND: Children spend a significant portion of their days in sedentary behavior (SB) and on average fail to engage in adequate physical activity (PA). The school built environment may influence SB and PA, but research is limited. This natural experiment evaluated whether an elementary school de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brittin, Jeri, Frerichs, Leah, Sirard, John R., Wells, Nancy M., Myers, Beth M., Garcia, Jeanette, Sorensen, Dina, Trowbridge, Matthew J., Huang, Terry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189236
_version_ 1783284722061803520
author Brittin, Jeri
Frerichs, Leah
Sirard, John R.
Wells, Nancy M.
Myers, Beth M.
Garcia, Jeanette
Sorensen, Dina
Trowbridge, Matthew J.
Huang, Terry
author_facet Brittin, Jeri
Frerichs, Leah
Sirard, John R.
Wells, Nancy M.
Myers, Beth M.
Garcia, Jeanette
Sorensen, Dina
Trowbridge, Matthew J.
Huang, Terry
author_sort Brittin, Jeri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children spend a significant portion of their days in sedentary behavior (SB) and on average fail to engage in adequate physical activity (PA). The school built environment may influence SB and PA, but research is limited. This natural experiment evaluated whether an elementary school designed to promote movement impacted students’ school-time SB and PA. METHODS: Accelerometers measured SB and PA at pre and post time-points in an intervention group who moved to the new school (n = 21) and in a comparison group experiencing no school environmental change (n = 20). Difference-in-difference (DD) analysis examined SB and PA outcomes in these groups. Measures were also collected post-intervention from an independent, grade-matched group of students in the new school (n = 21). RESULTS: As expected, maturational increases in SB were observed. However, DD analysis estimated that the intervention attenuated increase in SB by 81.2 ± 11.4 minutes/day (p<0.001), controlling for time in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The intervention was also estimated to increase daily number of breaks from SB by 23.4 ± 2.6 (p < .001) and to increase light physical activity (LPA) by 67.7 ± 10.7 minutes/day (p<0.001). However, the intervention decreased MVPA by 10.3 ± 2.3 minutes/day (p<0.001). Results of grade-matched independent samples analysis were similar, with students in the new vs. old school spending 90.5 ± 16.1 fewer minutes/day in SB, taking 21.1 ± 2.7 more breaks from SB (p<0.001), and spending 64.5 ± 14.8 more minutes in LPA (p<0.001), controlling for time in MVPA. Students in the new school spent 13.1 ± 2.7 fewer minutes in MVPA (p<0.001) than their counterparts in the old school. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found that active school design had beneficial effects on SB and LPA, but not on MVPA. Mixed results point to a need for active classroom design strategies to mitigate SB, and quick access from classrooms to areas permissive of high-intensity activities to promote MVPA. Integrating active design with programs/policies to promote PA may yield greatest impact on PA of all intensities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57207512017-12-15 Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment Brittin, Jeri Frerichs, Leah Sirard, John R. Wells, Nancy M. Myers, Beth M. Garcia, Jeanette Sorensen, Dina Trowbridge, Matthew J. Huang, Terry PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Children spend a significant portion of their days in sedentary behavior (SB) and on average fail to engage in adequate physical activity (PA). The school built environment may influence SB and PA, but research is limited. This natural experiment evaluated whether an elementary school designed to promote movement impacted students’ school-time SB and PA. METHODS: Accelerometers measured SB and PA at pre and post time-points in an intervention group who moved to the new school (n = 21) and in a comparison group experiencing no school environmental change (n = 20). Difference-in-difference (DD) analysis examined SB and PA outcomes in these groups. Measures were also collected post-intervention from an independent, grade-matched group of students in the new school (n = 21). RESULTS: As expected, maturational increases in SB were observed. However, DD analysis estimated that the intervention attenuated increase in SB by 81.2 ± 11.4 minutes/day (p<0.001), controlling for time in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The intervention was also estimated to increase daily number of breaks from SB by 23.4 ± 2.6 (p < .001) and to increase light physical activity (LPA) by 67.7 ± 10.7 minutes/day (p<0.001). However, the intervention decreased MVPA by 10.3 ± 2.3 minutes/day (p<0.001). Results of grade-matched independent samples analysis were similar, with students in the new vs. old school spending 90.5 ± 16.1 fewer minutes/day in SB, taking 21.1 ± 2.7 more breaks from SB (p<0.001), and spending 64.5 ± 14.8 more minutes in LPA (p<0.001), controlling for time in MVPA. Students in the new school spent 13.1 ± 2.7 fewer minutes in MVPA (p<0.001) than their counterparts in the old school. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found that active school design had beneficial effects on SB and LPA, but not on MVPA. Mixed results point to a need for active classroom design strategies to mitigate SB, and quick access from classrooms to areas permissive of high-intensity activities to promote MVPA. Integrating active design with programs/policies to promote PA may yield greatest impact on PA of all intensities. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720751/ /pubmed/29216300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189236 Text en © 2017 Brittin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brittin, Jeri
Frerichs, Leah
Sirard, John R.
Wells, Nancy M.
Myers, Beth M.
Garcia, Jeanette
Sorensen, Dina
Trowbridge, Matthew J.
Huang, Terry
Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title_full Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title_fullStr Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title_short Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment
title_sort impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: a pilot natural experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189236
work_keys_str_mv AT brittinjeri impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT frerichsleah impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT sirardjohnr impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT wellsnancym impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT myersbethm impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT garciajeanette impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT sorensendina impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT trowbridgematthewj impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment
AT huangterry impactsofactiveschooldesignonschooltimesedentarybehaviorandphysicalactivityapilotnaturalexperiment