Cargando…

Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses

No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are increasingly implemented for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. Yet, assessing NTMR effectiveness depends on partitioning the effects of NTMR protection and benthic habitat on protected species. Such partitioning is often difficult, since most stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russ, Garry R., Lowe, Jake R., Rizzari, Justin R., Bergseth, Brock J., Alcala, Angel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188515
_version_ 1783284726537125888
author Russ, Garry R.
Lowe, Jake R.
Rizzari, Justin R.
Bergseth, Brock J.
Alcala, Angel C.
author_facet Russ, Garry R.
Lowe, Jake R.
Rizzari, Justin R.
Bergseth, Brock J.
Alcala, Angel C.
author_sort Russ, Garry R.
collection PubMed
description No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are increasingly implemented for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. Yet, assessing NTMR effectiveness depends on partitioning the effects of NTMR protection and benthic habitat on protected species. Such partitioning is often difficult, since most studies lack well-designed sampling programs (i.e. Before-After-Control-Impact-Pair designs) spanning long-term time scales. Spanning 31 years, this study quantifies the effects of NTMR protection and changes to benthic habitat on the density of tropical wrasses (F. Labridae) at Sumilon and Apo Islands, Philippines. Five species of wrasse were studied: two species of large-bodied (40–50 cm TL) Hemigymnus that were vulnerable to fishing, and three species of small-bodied (10–25 cm TL) Thalassoma and Cirrhilabrus that were not targeted by fishing. NTMR protection had no measurable effect on wrasse density, irrespective of species or body size, over 20 (Sumilon) and 31 (Apo) years of protection. However, the density of wrasses was often affected strongly by benthic cover. Hemigymnus spp. had a positive association with hard coral cover, while Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. had strong positive associations with cover of rubble and dead substratum. These associations were most apparent after environmental disturbances (typhoons, coral bleaching, crown of thorns starfish (COTS) outbreaks, use of explosives and drive nets) reduced live hard coral cover and increased cover of rubble, dead substratum and sand. Disturbances that reduced hard coral cover often reduced the density of Hemigymnus spp. and increased the density of Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. rapidly (1–2 years). As hard coral recovered, density of Hemigymnus spp. often increased while density of Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. often decreased, often on scales of 5–10 years. This study demonstrates that wrasse population density was influenced more by changes to benthic cover than by protection from fishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57207692017-12-15 Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses Russ, Garry R. Lowe, Jake R. Rizzari, Justin R. Bergseth, Brock J. Alcala, Angel C. PLoS One Research Article No-take marine reserves (NTMRs) are increasingly implemented for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. Yet, assessing NTMR effectiveness depends on partitioning the effects of NTMR protection and benthic habitat on protected species. Such partitioning is often difficult, since most studies lack well-designed sampling programs (i.e. Before-After-Control-Impact-Pair designs) spanning long-term time scales. Spanning 31 years, this study quantifies the effects of NTMR protection and changes to benthic habitat on the density of tropical wrasses (F. Labridae) at Sumilon and Apo Islands, Philippines. Five species of wrasse were studied: two species of large-bodied (40–50 cm TL) Hemigymnus that were vulnerable to fishing, and three species of small-bodied (10–25 cm TL) Thalassoma and Cirrhilabrus that were not targeted by fishing. NTMR protection had no measurable effect on wrasse density, irrespective of species or body size, over 20 (Sumilon) and 31 (Apo) years of protection. However, the density of wrasses was often affected strongly by benthic cover. Hemigymnus spp. had a positive association with hard coral cover, while Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. had strong positive associations with cover of rubble and dead substratum. These associations were most apparent after environmental disturbances (typhoons, coral bleaching, crown of thorns starfish (COTS) outbreaks, use of explosives and drive nets) reduced live hard coral cover and increased cover of rubble, dead substratum and sand. Disturbances that reduced hard coral cover often reduced the density of Hemigymnus spp. and increased the density of Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. rapidly (1–2 years). As hard coral recovered, density of Hemigymnus spp. often increased while density of Thalassoma spp. and Cirrhilabrus spp. often decreased, often on scales of 5–10 years. This study demonstrates that wrasse population density was influenced more by changes to benthic cover than by protection from fishing. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720769/ /pubmed/29216194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188515 Text en © 2017 Russ et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Russ, Garry R.
Lowe, Jake R.
Rizzari, Justin R.
Bergseth, Brock J.
Alcala, Angel C.
Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title_full Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title_fullStr Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title_full_unstemmed Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title_short Partitioning no-take marine reserve (NTMR) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
title_sort partitioning no-take marine reserve (ntmr) and benthic habitat effects on density of small and large-bodied tropical wrasses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188515
work_keys_str_mv AT russgarryr partitioningnotakemarinereserventmrandbenthichabitateffectsondensityofsmallandlargebodiedtropicalwrasses
AT lowejaker partitioningnotakemarinereserventmrandbenthichabitateffectsondensityofsmallandlargebodiedtropicalwrasses
AT rizzarijustinr partitioningnotakemarinereserventmrandbenthichabitateffectsondensityofsmallandlargebodiedtropicalwrasses
AT bergsethbrockj partitioningnotakemarinereserventmrandbenthichabitateffectsondensityofsmallandlargebodiedtropicalwrasses
AT alcalaangelc partitioningnotakemarinereserventmrandbenthichabitateffectsondensityofsmallandlargebodiedtropicalwrasses