Cargando…
Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory sh...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242 |
_version_ | 1783284727765008384 |
---|---|
author | Sugano, Yoshimori Keetels, Mirjam Vroomen, Jean |
author_facet | Sugano, Yoshimori Keetels, Mirjam Vroomen, Jean |
author_sort | Sugano, Yoshimori |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory shift of motor timing (when did I tap?) and/or the sensory timing of the feedback (when did I hear/see the feedback?). To examine this, we asked participants to voluntarily tap their index finger at a constant pace while receiving visual or auditory feedback (a flash or pip) that was either synced or somewhat delayed relative to the tap. Following this exposure phase, they then performed a simple reaction time (RT) task to measure the sensory timing of the exposure stimulus, and a sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) task (tapping in synchrony with a flash or pip as pacing stimulus) to measure the point of subjective synchrony between the tap and pacing stimulus. The results showed that after exposure to delayed auditory feedback, participants tapped earlier (~21.5 ms) relative to auditory pacing stimuli (= temporal recalibration) and reacted faster (~5.6 ms) to auditory stimuli. For visual exposure and test stimuli, there were no such compensatory effects. These results indicate that adjustments of audio-motor synchrony can to some extent be explained by a change in the speed of auditory sensory processing. We discuss this in terms of an attentional modulation of sensory processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5720774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57207742017-12-15 Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing Sugano, Yoshimori Keetels, Mirjam Vroomen, Jean PLoS One Research Article Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory shift of motor timing (when did I tap?) and/or the sensory timing of the feedback (when did I hear/see the feedback?). To examine this, we asked participants to voluntarily tap their index finger at a constant pace while receiving visual or auditory feedback (a flash or pip) that was either synced or somewhat delayed relative to the tap. Following this exposure phase, they then performed a simple reaction time (RT) task to measure the sensory timing of the exposure stimulus, and a sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) task (tapping in synchrony with a flash or pip as pacing stimulus) to measure the point of subjective synchrony between the tap and pacing stimulus. The results showed that after exposure to delayed auditory feedback, participants tapped earlier (~21.5 ms) relative to auditory pacing stimuli (= temporal recalibration) and reacted faster (~5.6 ms) to auditory stimuli. For visual exposure and test stimuli, there were no such compensatory effects. These results indicate that adjustments of audio-motor synchrony can to some extent be explained by a change in the speed of auditory sensory processing. We discuss this in terms of an attentional modulation of sensory processing. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720774/ /pubmed/29216307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242 Text en © 2017 Sugano et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sugano, Yoshimori Keetels, Mirjam Vroomen, Jean Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title | Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title_full | Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title_fullStr | Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title_short | Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
title_sort | audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suganoyoshimori audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing AT keetelsmirjam audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing AT vroomenjean audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing |