Cargando…

Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing

Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugano, Yoshimori, Keetels, Mirjam, Vroomen, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242
_version_ 1783284727765008384
author Sugano, Yoshimori
Keetels, Mirjam
Vroomen, Jean
author_facet Sugano, Yoshimori
Keetels, Mirjam
Vroomen, Jean
author_sort Sugano, Yoshimori
collection PubMed
description Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory shift of motor timing (when did I tap?) and/or the sensory timing of the feedback (when did I hear/see the feedback?). To examine this, we asked participants to voluntarily tap their index finger at a constant pace while receiving visual or auditory feedback (a flash or pip) that was either synced or somewhat delayed relative to the tap. Following this exposure phase, they then performed a simple reaction time (RT) task to measure the sensory timing of the exposure stimulus, and a sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) task (tapping in synchrony with a flash or pip as pacing stimulus) to measure the point of subjective synchrony between the tap and pacing stimulus. The results showed that after exposure to delayed auditory feedback, participants tapped earlier (~21.5 ms) relative to auditory pacing stimuli (= temporal recalibration) and reacted faster (~5.6 ms) to auditory stimuli. For visual exposure and test stimuli, there were no such compensatory effects. These results indicate that adjustments of audio-motor synchrony can to some extent be explained by a change in the speed of auditory sensory processing. We discuss this in terms of an attentional modulation of sensory processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57207742017-12-15 Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing Sugano, Yoshimori Keetels, Mirjam Vroomen, Jean PLoS One Research Article Perception of synchrony between one's own action (a finger tap) and the sensory feedback thereof (a visual flash or an auditory pip) can be recalibrated after exposure to an artificially inserted delay between them (temporal recalibration effect: TRE). TRE might be mediated by a compensatory shift of motor timing (when did I tap?) and/or the sensory timing of the feedback (when did I hear/see the feedback?). To examine this, we asked participants to voluntarily tap their index finger at a constant pace while receiving visual or auditory feedback (a flash or pip) that was either synced or somewhat delayed relative to the tap. Following this exposure phase, they then performed a simple reaction time (RT) task to measure the sensory timing of the exposure stimulus, and a sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) task (tapping in synchrony with a flash or pip as pacing stimulus) to measure the point of subjective synchrony between the tap and pacing stimulus. The results showed that after exposure to delayed auditory feedback, participants tapped earlier (~21.5 ms) relative to auditory pacing stimuli (= temporal recalibration) and reacted faster (~5.6 ms) to auditory stimuli. For visual exposure and test stimuli, there were no such compensatory effects. These results indicate that adjustments of audio-motor synchrony can to some extent be explained by a change in the speed of auditory sensory processing. We discuss this in terms of an attentional modulation of sensory processing. Public Library of Science 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5720774/ /pubmed/29216307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242 Text en © 2017 Sugano et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sugano, Yoshimori
Keetels, Mirjam
Vroomen, Jean
Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title_full Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title_fullStr Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title_full_unstemmed Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title_short Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
title_sort audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189242
work_keys_str_mv AT suganoyoshimori audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing
AT keetelsmirjam audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing
AT vroomenjean audiomotorbutnotvisuomotortemporalrecalibrationspeedsupsensoryprocessing