Cargando…
A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly indiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932 |
_version_ | 1783284776556298240 |
---|---|
author | Katsura, Toshiki Fujimoto, Megumi Shizawa, Miho Hoshino, Akiko Usui, Kanae Yokoyama, Eri Hara, Mayumi |
author_facet | Katsura, Toshiki Fujimoto, Megumi Shizawa, Miho Hoshino, Akiko Usui, Kanae Yokoyama, Eri Hara, Mayumi |
author_sort | Katsura, Toshiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly individuals who, in 2008, underwent a specific health checkup (hereafter referred to as the ‘specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals’) for those aged 75 years and above. They answered questions from basic checklists at the time, and 180 individuals were excluded as they had already qualified for requiring the certificate of long-term care at the time of the checkup. The follow-up period extended from the day of the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals to March 31, 2013. The data were analyzed using the certificate of needing long-term care as the response variable. The explanatory variables were the basic attributes, items listed in the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals, interview sheets, and basic checklists. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 1,280 elderly individuals qualified for requiring the certificate of needing long-term care. The risk factors for the young-old elderly individuals aged 65 to 74 years were as follows: hepatic dysfunction (hazard ratio {HR}=1.69), the presence of subjective symptoms (HR=1.41), an above-normal abdominal circumference (HR=1.36), old age (HR=1.13), a reduced frequency of going out since the previous year (HR=1.87), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.86), no deposit or withdrawals made (HR=1.84), the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.50), an inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.49), as well as an increased difficulty in eating tough food items compared with 6 months prior (HR=1.44). The risk factors for the old-old elderly individuals were as follows: a positive reaction on proteinuria (HR=1.27), anemia (HR=1.18), old age (HR=1.10), inability to travel on a bus or train by themselves (HR=1.53), the inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.48), weight loss (HR=1.36), a reduced sense of appreciation of the activities they had previously participated in, over a span of 2 weeks (HR=1.30), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.23), and the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.20). Conclusion: The items listed in the specific medical checkup as well as the basic checklists were found to be risk factors for both the young-old elderly individuals and the old-old elderly individuals, indicating the need to utilize these lists for the prevention of nursing even in the late stages of life. Moreover, these results suggest the importance of screening elderly individuals suffering from hyperkinesis using the basic checklist and conducting preventive interventions in order to maintain and improve their physical functions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57212902017-12-18 A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup Katsura, Toshiki Fujimoto, Megumi Shizawa, Miho Hoshino, Akiko Usui, Kanae Yokoyama, Eri Hara, Mayumi J Rural Med Original Article Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly individuals who, in 2008, underwent a specific health checkup (hereafter referred to as the ‘specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals’) for those aged 75 years and above. They answered questions from basic checklists at the time, and 180 individuals were excluded as they had already qualified for requiring the certificate of long-term care at the time of the checkup. The follow-up period extended from the day of the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals to March 31, 2013. The data were analyzed using the certificate of needing long-term care as the response variable. The explanatory variables were the basic attributes, items listed in the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals, interview sheets, and basic checklists. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 1,280 elderly individuals qualified for requiring the certificate of needing long-term care. The risk factors for the young-old elderly individuals aged 65 to 74 years were as follows: hepatic dysfunction (hazard ratio {HR}=1.69), the presence of subjective symptoms (HR=1.41), an above-normal abdominal circumference (HR=1.36), old age (HR=1.13), a reduced frequency of going out since the previous year (HR=1.87), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.86), no deposit or withdrawals made (HR=1.84), the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.50), an inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.49), as well as an increased difficulty in eating tough food items compared with 6 months prior (HR=1.44). The risk factors for the old-old elderly individuals were as follows: a positive reaction on proteinuria (HR=1.27), anemia (HR=1.18), old age (HR=1.10), inability to travel on a bus or train by themselves (HR=1.53), the inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.48), weight loss (HR=1.36), a reduced sense of appreciation of the activities they had previously participated in, over a span of 2 weeks (HR=1.30), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.23), and the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.20). Conclusion: The items listed in the specific medical checkup as well as the basic checklists were found to be risk factors for both the young-old elderly individuals and the old-old elderly individuals, indicating the need to utilize these lists for the prevention of nursing even in the late stages of life. Moreover, these results suggest the importance of screening elderly individuals suffering from hyperkinesis using the basic checklist and conducting preventive interventions in order to maintain and improve their physical functions. The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2017-11-30 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5721290/ /pubmed/29255523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932 Text en ©2017 The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Katsura, Toshiki Fujimoto, Megumi Shizawa, Miho Hoshino, Akiko Usui, Kanae Yokoyama, Eri Hara, Mayumi A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup |
title | A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
title_full | A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
title_fullStr | A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
title_short | A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
title_sort | retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated
long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: basic checklist and specific
health checkup |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katsuratoshiki aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT fujimotomegumi aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT shizawamiho aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT hoshinoakiko aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT usuikanae aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT yokoyamaeri aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT haramayumi aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT katsuratoshiki retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT fujimotomegumi retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT shizawamiho retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT hoshinoakiko retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT usuikanae retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT yokoyamaeri retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup AT haramayumi retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup |