Cargando…

A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup

Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly indiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katsura, Toshiki, Fujimoto, Megumi, Shizawa, Miho, Hoshino, Akiko, Usui, Kanae, Yokoyama, Eri, Hara, Mayumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255523
http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932
_version_ 1783284776556298240
author Katsura, Toshiki
Fujimoto, Megumi
Shizawa, Miho
Hoshino, Akiko
Usui, Kanae
Yokoyama, Eri
Hara, Mayumi
author_facet Katsura, Toshiki
Fujimoto, Megumi
Shizawa, Miho
Hoshino, Akiko
Usui, Kanae
Yokoyama, Eri
Hara, Mayumi
author_sort Katsura, Toshiki
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly individuals who, in 2008, underwent a specific health checkup (hereafter referred to as the ‘specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals’) for those aged 75 years and above. They answered questions from basic checklists at the time, and 180 individuals were excluded as they had already qualified for requiring the certificate of long-term care at the time of the checkup. The follow-up period extended from the day of the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals to March 31, 2013. The data were analyzed using the certificate of needing long-term care as the response variable. The explanatory variables were the basic attributes, items listed in the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals, interview sheets, and basic checklists. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 1,280 elderly individuals qualified for requiring the certificate of needing long-term care. The risk factors for the young-old elderly individuals aged 65 to 74 years were as follows: hepatic dysfunction (hazard ratio {HR}=1.69), the presence of subjective symptoms (HR=1.41), an above-normal abdominal circumference (HR=1.36), old age (HR=1.13), a reduced frequency of going out since the previous year (HR=1.87), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.86), no deposit or withdrawals made (HR=1.84), the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.50), an inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.49), as well as an increased difficulty in eating tough food items compared with 6 months prior (HR=1.44). The risk factors for the old-old elderly individuals were as follows: a positive reaction on proteinuria (HR=1.27), anemia (HR=1.18), old age (HR=1.10), inability to travel on a bus or train by themselves (HR=1.53), the inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.48), weight loss (HR=1.36), a reduced sense of appreciation of the activities they had previously participated in, over a span of 2 weeks (HR=1.30), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.23), and the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.20). Conclusion: The items listed in the specific medical checkup as well as the basic checklists were found to be risk factors for both the young-old elderly individuals and the old-old elderly individuals, indicating the need to utilize these lists for the prevention of nursing even in the late stages of life. Moreover, these results suggest the importance of screening elderly individuals suffering from hyperkinesis using the basic checklist and conducting preventive interventions in order to maintain and improve their physical functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57212902017-12-18 A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup Katsura, Toshiki Fujimoto, Megumi Shizawa, Miho Hoshino, Akiko Usui, Kanae Yokoyama, Eri Hara, Mayumi J Rural Med Original Article Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the requirement of a certificate of long-term care using a basic checklist and items listed in the Special Health Checkup. Method: This study included 7,820 individuals living in Uji city, who were selected from among 8,000 elderly individuals who, in 2008, underwent a specific health checkup (hereafter referred to as the ‘specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals’) for those aged 75 years and above. They answered questions from basic checklists at the time, and 180 individuals were excluded as they had already qualified for requiring the certificate of long-term care at the time of the checkup. The follow-up period extended from the day of the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals to March 31, 2013. The data were analyzed using the certificate of needing long-term care as the response variable. The explanatory variables were the basic attributes, items listed in the specific health checkup for the old-old elderly individuals, interview sheets, and basic checklists. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 1,280 elderly individuals qualified for requiring the certificate of needing long-term care. The risk factors for the young-old elderly individuals aged 65 to 74 years were as follows: hepatic dysfunction (hazard ratio {HR}=1.69), the presence of subjective symptoms (HR=1.41), an above-normal abdominal circumference (HR=1.36), old age (HR=1.13), a reduced frequency of going out since the previous year (HR=1.87), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.86), no deposit or withdrawals made (HR=1.84), the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.50), an inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.49), as well as an increased difficulty in eating tough food items compared with 6 months prior (HR=1.44). The risk factors for the old-old elderly individuals were as follows: a positive reaction on proteinuria (HR=1.27), anemia (HR=1.18), old age (HR=1.10), inability to travel on a bus or train by themselves (HR=1.53), the inability to climb stairs without holding a railing or wall (HR=1.48), weight loss (HR=1.36), a reduced sense of appreciation of the activities they had previously participated in, over a span of 2 weeks (HR=1.30), the use of support for standing up after being seated on a chair (HR=1.23), and the anxiety of falling down (HR=1.20). Conclusion: The items listed in the specific medical checkup as well as the basic checklists were found to be risk factors for both the young-old elderly individuals and the old-old elderly individuals, indicating the need to utilize these lists for the prevention of nursing even in the late stages of life. Moreover, these results suggest the importance of screening elderly individuals suffering from hyperkinesis using the basic checklist and conducting preventive interventions in order to maintain and improve their physical functions. The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2017-11-30 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5721290/ /pubmed/29255523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932 Text en ©2017 The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Katsura, Toshiki
Fujimoto, Megumi
Shizawa, Miho
Hoshino, Akiko
Usui, Kanae
Yokoyama, Eri
Hara, Mayumi
A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title_full A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title_fullStr A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title_short A retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: Basic checklist and specific health checkup
title_sort retrospective cohort study on the risk assessment of newly certificated long-term care need of elderly individuals in a community: basic checklist and specific health checkup
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255523
http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2932
work_keys_str_mv AT katsuratoshiki aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT fujimotomegumi aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT shizawamiho aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT hoshinoakiko aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT usuikanae aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT yokoyamaeri aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT haramayumi aretrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT katsuratoshiki retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT fujimotomegumi retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT shizawamiho retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT hoshinoakiko retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT usuikanae retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT yokoyamaeri retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup
AT haramayumi retrospectivecohortstudyontheriskassessmentofnewlycertificatedlongtermcareneedofelderlyindividualsinacommunitybasicchecklistandspecifichealthcheckup