Cargando…

The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans

BACKGROUND: The underlying mechanisms and processes that prompt the colonisation of extreme environments, such as caves, constitute major research themes of evolutionary biology and biospeleology. The special adaptations required to survive in subterranean environments (low food availability, hypoxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L., Balázs, Gergely, Wilkins, Blake, Herczeg, Gábor, Bracken-Grissom, Heather D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9
_version_ 1783284791813079040
author Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L.
Balázs, Gergely
Wilkins, Blake
Herczeg, Gábor
Bracken-Grissom, Heather D.
author_facet Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L.
Balázs, Gergely
Wilkins, Blake
Herczeg, Gábor
Bracken-Grissom, Heather D.
author_sort Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The underlying mechanisms and processes that prompt the colonisation of extreme environments, such as caves, constitute major research themes of evolutionary biology and biospeleology. The special adaptations required to survive in subterranean environments (low food availability, hypoxic waters, permanent darkness), and the geographical isolation of caves, nominate cave biodiversity as ideal subjects to answer long-standing questions concerning the interplay amongst adaptation, biogeography, and evolution. The present project aims to examine the phylogeographic patterns exhibited by two sympatric species of surface and cave-dwelling peracarid crustaceans (Asellus aquaticus and Niphargus hrabei), and in doing so elucidate the possible roles of isolation and exaptation in the colonisation and successful adaptation to the cave environment. RESULTS: Specimens of both species were sampled from freshwater hypogean (cave) and epigean (surface) habitats in Hungary, and additional data from neighbouring countries were sourced from Genbank. Sequencing of mitochondrial and nuclear loci revealed, through haplotype network reconstruction (TCS) and phylogenetic inference, the genetic structure, phylogeographic patterns, and divergence-time estimates of A. aquaticus and N. hrabei surface and cave populations. Contrasting phylogeographic patterns were found between species, with A. aquaticus showing strong genetic differentiation between cave and surface populations and N. hrabei lacking any evidence of genetic structure mediated by the cave environment. Furthermore, N. hrabei populations show very low levels of genetic differentiation throughout their range, which suggests the possibility of recent expansion events over the last few thousand years. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation by cave environment, rather than distance, is likely to drive the genetic structuring observed between immediately adjacent cave and surface populations of A. aquaticus, a predominantly surface species with only moderate exaptations to subterranean life. For N. hrabei, in which populations exhibit a fully ‘cave-adapted’ (troglomorphic) phenotype, the lack of genetic structure suggests that subterranean environments do not pose a dispersal barrier for this surface-cave species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57213662017-12-11 The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L. Balázs, Gergely Wilkins, Blake Herczeg, Gábor Bracken-Grissom, Heather D. BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The underlying mechanisms and processes that prompt the colonisation of extreme environments, such as caves, constitute major research themes of evolutionary biology and biospeleology. The special adaptations required to survive in subterranean environments (low food availability, hypoxic waters, permanent darkness), and the geographical isolation of caves, nominate cave biodiversity as ideal subjects to answer long-standing questions concerning the interplay amongst adaptation, biogeography, and evolution. The present project aims to examine the phylogeographic patterns exhibited by two sympatric species of surface and cave-dwelling peracarid crustaceans (Asellus aquaticus and Niphargus hrabei), and in doing so elucidate the possible roles of isolation and exaptation in the colonisation and successful adaptation to the cave environment. RESULTS: Specimens of both species were sampled from freshwater hypogean (cave) and epigean (surface) habitats in Hungary, and additional data from neighbouring countries were sourced from Genbank. Sequencing of mitochondrial and nuclear loci revealed, through haplotype network reconstruction (TCS) and phylogenetic inference, the genetic structure, phylogeographic patterns, and divergence-time estimates of A. aquaticus and N. hrabei surface and cave populations. Contrasting phylogeographic patterns were found between species, with A. aquaticus showing strong genetic differentiation between cave and surface populations and N. hrabei lacking any evidence of genetic structure mediated by the cave environment. Furthermore, N. hrabei populations show very low levels of genetic differentiation throughout their range, which suggests the possibility of recent expansion events over the last few thousand years. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation by cave environment, rather than distance, is likely to drive the genetic structuring observed between immediately adjacent cave and surface populations of A. aquaticus, a predominantly surface species with only moderate exaptations to subterranean life. For N. hrabei, in which populations exhibit a fully ‘cave-adapted’ (troglomorphic) phenotype, the lack of genetic structure suggests that subterranean environments do not pose a dispersal barrier for this surface-cave species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5721366/ /pubmed/29216829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pérez-Moreno, Jorge L.
Balázs, Gergely
Wilkins, Blake
Herczeg, Gábor
Bracken-Grissom, Heather D.
The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title_full The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title_fullStr The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title_full_unstemmed The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title_short The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
title_sort role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1094-9
work_keys_str_mv AT perezmorenojorgel theroleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT balazsgergely theroleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT wilkinsblake theroleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT herczeggabor theroleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT brackengrissomheatherd theroleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT perezmorenojorgel roleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT balazsgergely roleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT wilkinsblake roleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT herczeggabor roleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans
AT brackengrissomheatherd roleofisolationoncontrastingphylogeographicpatternsintwocavecrustaceans