Cargando…

Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQUIA(TM) is a new gastrointestinal (GI) system with high compressive strength, surface microhardness (MH), and fluoride release potential. This in vitro study aimed to assess the effect of aging and type of protective coating on the MH of EQUIA(TM) GI cement. MATERIALS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faraji, Foad, Heshmat, Haleh, Banava, Sepideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259364
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQUIA(TM) is a new gastrointestinal (GI) system with high compressive strength, surface microhardness (MH), and fluoride release potential. This in vitro study aimed to assess the effect of aging and type of protective coating on the MH of EQUIA(TM) GI cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 disc-shaped specimens measuring 9 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were fabricated of EQUIA(TM) GI and divided into three groups of G-Coat nanofilled coating (a), no coating (b) and margin bond (c). The Vickers MH value of specimens was measured before (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months after water storage. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Group B had significantly higher MH than the other two groups at baseline. Both G-Coat and margin bond increased the surface MH of GI at 3 and 6 months. The MH values of G-Coat and margin bond groups did not significantly increase or decrease between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: The increase in MH was greater in the G-Coat compared to the margin bond group in the long-term. Clinically, margin bond may be a suitable alternative when G-Coat is not available.