Cargando…

Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQUIA(TM) is a new gastrointestinal (GI) system with high compressive strength, surface microhardness (MH), and fluoride release potential. This in vitro study aimed to assess the effect of aging and type of protective coating on the MH of EQUIA(TM) GI cement. MATERIALS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faraji, Foad, Heshmat, Haleh, Banava, Sepideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259364
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16
_version_ 1783284822099099648
author Faraji, Foad
Heshmat, Haleh
Banava, Sepideh
author_facet Faraji, Foad
Heshmat, Haleh
Banava, Sepideh
author_sort Faraji, Foad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQUIA(TM) is a new gastrointestinal (GI) system with high compressive strength, surface microhardness (MH), and fluoride release potential. This in vitro study aimed to assess the effect of aging and type of protective coating on the MH of EQUIA(TM) GI cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 disc-shaped specimens measuring 9 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were fabricated of EQUIA(TM) GI and divided into three groups of G-Coat nanofilled coating (a), no coating (b) and margin bond (c). The Vickers MH value of specimens was measured before (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months after water storage. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Group B had significantly higher MH than the other two groups at baseline. Both G-Coat and margin bond increased the surface MH of GI at 3 and 6 months. The MH values of G-Coat and margin bond groups did not significantly increase or decrease between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: The increase in MH was greater in the G-Coat compared to the margin bond group in the long-term. Clinically, margin bond may be a suitable alternative when G-Coat is not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57215092017-12-19 Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin Faraji, Foad Heshmat, Haleh Banava, Sepideh J Conserv Dent Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQUIA(TM) is a new gastrointestinal (GI) system with high compressive strength, surface microhardness (MH), and fluoride release potential. This in vitro study aimed to assess the effect of aging and type of protective coating on the MH of EQUIA(TM) GI cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 disc-shaped specimens measuring 9 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were fabricated of EQUIA(TM) GI and divided into three groups of G-Coat nanofilled coating (a), no coating (b) and margin bond (c). The Vickers MH value of specimens was measured before (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months after water storage. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Group B had significantly higher MH than the other two groups at baseline. Both G-Coat and margin bond increased the surface MH of GI at 3 and 6 months. The MH values of G-Coat and margin bond groups did not significantly increase or decrease between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: The increase in MH was greater in the G-Coat compared to the margin bond group in the long-term. Clinically, margin bond may be a suitable alternative when G-Coat is not available. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5721509/ /pubmed/29259364 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Faraji, Foad
Heshmat, Haleh
Banava, Sepideh
Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title_full Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title_fullStr Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title_short Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
title_sort effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259364
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16
work_keys_str_mv AT farajifoad effectofprotectivecoatingonmicrohardnessofanewglassionomercementnanofilledcoatingversusunfilledresin
AT heshmathaleh effectofprotectivecoatingonmicrohardnessofanewglassionomercementnanofilledcoatingversusunfilledresin
AT banavasepideh effectofprotectivecoatingonmicrohardnessofanewglassionomercementnanofilledcoatingversusunfilledresin