Cargando…

Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration

To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, Pablo, García‐Vicente, Feliciano, Mínguez, Cristina, Floriano, Alejandro, Sevillano, David, Pérez, Leopoldo, Torres, Juan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676
_version_ 1783284825700958208
author Castro, Pablo
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Mínguez, Cristina
Floriano, Alejandro
Sevillano, David
Pérez, Leopoldo
Torres, Juan J.
author_facet Castro, Pablo
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Mínguez, Cristina
Floriano, Alejandro
Sevillano, David
Pérez, Leopoldo
Torres, Juan J.
author_sort Castro, Pablo
collection PubMed
description To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possible. The work reported here focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams in the range of energies used in external‐beam radiotherapy. With this aim, we considered various uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor, and reference conditions) associated with beam calibration. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration of approximately 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams ([Formula: see text] in both cases) when the [Formula: see text] formalism is used and [Formula: see text] is calculated theoretically. These values may vary depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. For primary standards based on clinical linear accelerator beam energies, the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. We also discuss the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the adoption of the absorbed dose to water formalism as compared with the air kerma formalism. PACS numbers: 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Hv
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57215332018-04-02 Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration Castro, Pablo García‐Vicente, Feliciano Mínguez, Cristina Floriano, Alejandro Sevillano, David Pérez, Leopoldo Torres, Juan J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possible. The work reported here focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams in the range of energies used in external‐beam radiotherapy. With this aim, we considered various uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor, and reference conditions) associated with beam calibration. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration of approximately 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams ([Formula: see text] in both cases) when the [Formula: see text] formalism is used and [Formula: see text] is calculated theoretically. These values may vary depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. For primary standards based on clinical linear accelerator beam energies, the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. We also discuss the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the adoption of the absorbed dose to water formalism as compared with the air kerma formalism. PACS numbers: 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Hv John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5721533/ /pubmed/18449162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676 Text en © 2008 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Castro, Pablo
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Mínguez, Cristina
Floriano, Alejandro
Sevillano, David
Pérez, Leopoldo
Torres, Juan J.
Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title_full Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title_fullStr Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title_full_unstemmed Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title_short Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
title_sort study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676
work_keys_str_mv AT castropablo studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT garciavicentefeliciano studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT minguezcristina studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT florianoalejandro studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT sevillanodavid studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT perezleopoldo studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration
AT torresjuanj studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration