Cargando…
Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676 |
_version_ | 1783284825700958208 |
---|---|
author | Castro, Pablo García‐Vicente, Feliciano Mínguez, Cristina Floriano, Alejandro Sevillano, David Pérez, Leopoldo Torres, Juan J. |
author_facet | Castro, Pablo García‐Vicente, Feliciano Mínguez, Cristina Floriano, Alejandro Sevillano, David Pérez, Leopoldo Torres, Juan J. |
author_sort | Castro, Pablo |
collection | PubMed |
description | To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possible. The work reported here focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams in the range of energies used in external‐beam radiotherapy. With this aim, we considered various uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor, and reference conditions) associated with beam calibration. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration of approximately 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams ([Formula: see text] in both cases) when the [Formula: see text] formalism is used and [Formula: see text] is calculated theoretically. These values may vary depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. For primary standards based on clinical linear accelerator beam energies, the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. We also discuss the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the adoption of the absorbed dose to water formalism as compared with the air kerma formalism. PACS numbers: 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Hv |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57215332018-04-02 Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration Castro, Pablo García‐Vicente, Feliciano Mínguez, Cristina Floriano, Alejandro Sevillano, David Pérez, Leopoldo Torres, Juan J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possible. The work reported here focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams in the range of energies used in external‐beam radiotherapy. With this aim, we considered various uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor, and reference conditions) associated with beam calibration. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration of approximately 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams ([Formula: see text] in both cases) when the [Formula: see text] formalism is used and [Formula: see text] is calculated theoretically. These values may vary depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. For primary standards based on clinical linear accelerator beam energies, the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. We also discuss the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the adoption of the absorbed dose to water formalism as compared with the air kerma formalism. PACS numbers: 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Hv John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5721533/ /pubmed/18449162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676 Text en © 2008 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Measurements Castro, Pablo García‐Vicente, Feliciano Mínguez, Cristina Floriano, Alejandro Sevillano, David Pérez, Leopoldo Torres, Juan J. Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title | Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title_full | Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title_fullStr | Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title_full_unstemmed | Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title_short | Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
title_sort | study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration |
topic | Radiation Measurements |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castropablo studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT garciavicentefeliciano studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT minguezcristina studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT florianoalejandro studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT sevillanodavid studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT perezleopoldo studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration AT torresjuanj studyoftheuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheabsorbeddosetowaterduringexternalbeamradiotherapycalibration |